Nobel Prize goes to scientists behind mRNA Covid Vaccines Nobel Prize goes to scientists behind mRNA Covid Vaccines - Talk of The Villages Florida

Nobel Prize goes to scientists behind mRNA Covid Vaccines

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-02-2023, 06:21 PM
coffeebean's Avatar
coffeebean coffeebean is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Village of Mallory Square
Posts: 7,959
Thanks: 463
Thanked 4,354 Times in 2,013 Posts
Default Nobel Prize goes to scientists behind mRNA Covid Vaccines

Congratulations to the pioneers.........

Nobel Prize goes to scientists behind mRNA Covid vaccines - BBC News
__________________
  #2  
Old 10-02-2023, 06:40 PM
frayedends frayedends is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 997
Thanks: 303
Thanked 1,120 Times in 424 Posts
Default

I coulda come up with a vaccine that doesn’t lower transmission or symptoms. Where’s my prize. LOL
  #3  
Old 10-02-2023, 07:00 PM
Happydaz Happydaz is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 700
Thanks: 1
Thanked 565 Times in 184 Posts
Default

Oh no, the vaccine deniers will come out again!
  #4  
Old 10-02-2023, 07:06 PM
Stu from NYC Stu from NYC is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 15,228
Thanks: 1,260
Thanked 16,230 Times in 6,354 Posts
Default

They deserve the award for the work they did and the lives they saved
  #5  
Old 10-02-2023, 11:22 PM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 15,120
Thanks: 7,601
Thanked 6,252 Times in 3,224 Posts
Default

I would comment but don’t want lengthy time out for posting my opinion. Run forest run
  #6  
Old 10-03-2023, 05:24 AM
frayedends frayedends is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 997
Thanks: 303
Thanked 1,120 Times in 424 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happydaz View Post
Oh no, the vaccine deniers will come out again!
Having an opinion that differs from yours doesn't make one a "denier". Based on my experience I don't believe the vaccine is effective and I question it's safety.

First: been in biotech for 27 years. When Trump said they'd have a vaccine in a year I said that was impossible. We couldn't even get through Phase I clinical trials in a year. Nevermind develop the vaccine plus get production launched, and trials started. Simply impossible.

Second: There are common cold viruses that are also coronaviruses. Yet we have never had a vaccine that was in the least bit effective. It's simply a difficult thing to vaccinate against. mRNA vaccines are a new tech that may (in the future) be able to do something for these viruses, but at the Covid 19 time we didn't have any working.

Third: personally I didn't get Covid until after I was vaccinated. I had no choice but to get vaccinated because work required it. I wasn't really concerned over the safety of the vaccine back then. I didn't have a full understanding of how mRNA vaccines worked. Now I'm quite simply afraid of them. Too many people with too many heart problems after the vaccine.

The vaccine wasn't tested appropriately for safety. The vaccine didn't reduce transmission rates, it didn't reduce the chances of getting sick from the virus. So what did it do?

The only argument to be made now is that perhaps it reduced the severity of the symptoms. But that can be debated. The lethality of the virus followed normal evolution of many viruses. From a survival standpoint, viruses become less virulent over time. Simply put, it doesn't make sense for a virus to kill it's host. That results in less chance of transmission. The common cold is an expert at continuing survival. Get people sick but don't kill them, so they can transmit to another person.

Anyhow, this stuff is debatable. We could talk about it, present different studies to support our opinion, etc. Instead they have us trashing each other with words like "deniers".

I can totally understand people not believing what I believe based on their experience and evidence. No need for us to be derogatory to each other. I have friends on the totally opposite side of the aisle on many different topics. We have a beer, we debate, we present evidence. We agree to disagree and then we hug and go home.

So I would suggest if this thread does turn into a debate (and doesn't get nuked from orbit) that everyone be respectful of each other. There are valid points on both sides of the issue.
  #7  
Old 10-03-2023, 06:41 AM
threeonemiles@outlook.com's Avatar
threeonemiles@outlook.com threeonemiles@outlook.com is offline
Member
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 95
Thanks: 0
Thanked 189 Times in 48 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coffeebean View Post
The Nobel Prize. What a sham.
__________________
Think while still legal. Become a critical thinker.

Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.

Joseph Stalin
  #8  
Old 10-03-2023, 06:56 AM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 7,237
Thanks: 2,245
Thanked 7,647 Times in 2,982 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frayedends View Post
Having an opinion that differs from yours doesn't make one a "denier".
Perhaps not, but ...

Quote:
Based on my experience I don't believe the vaccine is effective and I question it's safety.

...
Quote:
Originally Posted by frayedends View Post
I coulda come up with a vaccine that doesn’t lower transmission or symptoms. Where’s my prize. LOL
... denying that the vaccine is effective does.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
  #9  
Old 10-03-2023, 07:10 AM
frayedends frayedends is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 997
Thanks: 303
Thanked 1,120 Times in 424 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
Perhaps not, but ...





... denying that the vaccine is effective does.
The fact is that using the term denier is meant to be derogatory. It’s an attempt to stir an emotional response rather than a discussion. It’s a bully tactic basically.

My initial comment was meant to be a lighthearted jab at the Nobel prize. It is a well known fact, admitted by all of the scientific community that transmission was not lowered by the vaccine. As far as symptoms, yeah we could debate but there’s no scientific consensus at this point.

If the vaccine is effective and the virus is still so dangerous then why have the mandates been dropped almost everywhere (including the company I work).
  #10  
Old 10-03-2023, 07:51 AM
Moderator's Avatar
Moderator Moderator is online now
TOTV Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 25,421
Thanks: 17
Thanked 875 Times in 336 Posts
Default

Both sides have been presented.
Closed Thread

Tags
nobel, prize, scientists, mrna, covid

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 PM.