More about Clinton...confirming what we know
 

Linda Tripp reveals why 'Hillary Clinton must never be President' | Daily Mail Online

And even more:

Joe Biden

Now there's a good combination - Linda Tripp and Daily Mail Online. No thanks.

OK we got the usual diss the messenger....what do you have to offer about what was said (for a change)?

Dear Guest: I am not the OP. However, did you read the articles? How would you defend Clinton against her critics? What is it that Linda Tripp said that wasn't true? Isn't it true that Clinton is in violation of federal laws because she used a personal server and because she destroy e-mails that belonged to the State Department? didn't she break federal rules by not turning in these mails until she was forced to? Do you think it OK for any federal employee to ignore federal rules that were enacted to protect information that could harm citizens?

You dismiss Linda Tripp and the Daily Mail Online out of hand but contrary to evidence and common sense believe Clinton?????????????????


Personal Best Regards:

You Dumpublicans are so scared that Sec. Clinton will get the Democratic nomination and win the presidency that you are relying on hate articles by Linda Tripp that are in a fish wrapper?

Even the Regressives that usually post here are almost intelligence enough to see that is akin to having Al Sharpton as guest speaker at your Tea Party meeting discussing gun control.

The triple X kool aide was obviously not enough...now you are spiking it with blindness.

She is a criminal, no doubt about it. But, you have those easily led folks that find being a criminal a positive thing. You can't convince them. This election will be decided by the Independent voters, and they are not so easily led. Billary won't have the large black turnout that Obama had.

:agree:

I don't need and probably won't read the article. I didn't vote for her pervert husband, and I don't intend to vote for her. She is just about as much a socialist as Obama and I didn't vote for him either. Whether she gets elected or not, at least my conscience is clear that I didn't contribute to America's future demise. Her ideology doesn't mesh with mine, and that is all I need to know. She is a criminal. She unlawfully and knowingly mishandled classified information. Just one of her later ethical violations. But, the State Department is where a lot of political appointees that contributed to each president, gets their "reward." Call names as you wish. Any adult recognizes the juvenile that acts up at the dinner table. You may be excused. :wave:

They can't defend her. That's why they call names and blame Bush. Makes you wonder about the mental capacity of those that knowing support those that they can't defend. Like a very wiser person once said, those folks are just a few fries short of a Happy Meal! :mmmm:

Dear Guests,
Suppose, just suppose, that by some fluke that Sec. Clinton DOES win the Presidency against ______. Are all of you going to spend the next 8 years grousing over every piece of soundbite you can find?

Get out to your candidate of choice at this time and start working for him/her. Contribute money in large amounts to their campaigns. Let the candidate lead a good life with your money while they are still a candidate. Stir up the community with signs of support on your car and cart. Of course, be prepared for them to be taken off by opposing candidate supporters.

Stop just talking about how terrible the Democrats are but actually do something positive so when the Republican nominee is named, you might have had something to do with it. At that point, donate more money and time to the Republican PACs and start working volunteer time for that candidate. Get fired up!

Then, in November, get together with your fellow campaign workers, watch the returns on television, and hopefully see Karl Rove melt down like he did in 2012 when Ohio was called for Obama. That was PRICELESS.

Or you can just sit back, do nothing except gripe on TOV. The result will be the same, no matter what you do.

HILLARY CLINTON WINS THE PRESIDENCY IN 2016.

Personal Best Regards:

I don't want to get involved except I suggest you be nice person and plan to visit Hillary in prison after she gets convicted for mishandling 100s of classified emails because she is apparently an idiot as well as dishonest.

I am sure when she isn't convicted of anything everyone here will say they were wrong. Of course, that will be the case. Anyone that reads the posts on any one of threads here can see how opened minded the Republicans here are.

People never change their party affiliation. Right Donald Trump! When they do, they always have good things to say about their former friends. Donald Trump is heaping praise on Hillary right now. Anyone that can't see that just isn't looking.

Hillary was the real force in Bill's presidency. She ran things despite all evidence to the contrary. I think this woman has confused Nancy and Ron with Hillary and Bill. The cameras can make someone look good or bad. Ten years or so after Reagan left office, there was a news report to that effect.

A reporter asked Reagan a question, and he was on camera. Reagan head was bobbing up and down. He had no clue how to answer the reporter. Nancy was behind him, and also on camera. Nancy said, "That problem has come to our attention." Reagan repeated that word for word to the reporter. "That problem has come to our attention." Nancy, "we should have a solution to that problem soon." Ron "we should have a solution to that problem soon." Nancy, "when we do, we will contact you." Ron, "when we do, we will contact you."

If Tripp came forward in the late 90's, she might be believable. Now, only closed minded Republicans would believe her nonsense. If you go back in time, you can make any public person look good or bad.

I have said this before, Hillary has been running for president, since at least the nineties. How can any women endure the public humiliation she did, and still stay with her husband? That doesn't mean she was running the show in the 90's. Hardly!

My God could it be, a republican doesn't like Karl Rove! There is hope. By the way, I am not voting for Hillary. It will Sanders, or Kasich in the primary. It will depend on the one needs my vote more.

There is no federal law that stopped her from using a personal server.

Did she destroy emails that belonged to the state department? She might have, but how are you going to prove it?

Turn the mails to the fifth Benghazi investigation. You know the current one that the Chairman Trey Gowdy called a prosecution. That one. The one that is going to last until November, 2016. Given all the leaks out of these hearing, can you blame any candidate for not handing private emails over to the opposing party in the current world of politics.

Should she have handed the server to an independent party? No! She should sat there with an independent party, and gone over the emails one by one. However, the server should have never left her sight, or the independent party's sight.

Trust is a two way street. Only a fool would trust the Republicans with anything personal or not.

Dear Poster: There you go again posing as me. I suppose I should be flattered but your message no matter how you try and hide it comes out with an obvious bile against conservatives. I talk about issues not people. So if you are going to imitate me at least do a good version of it.

And by the way you may want to consider bona fides, character,charm, intelligence, etc as criteria then direct it toward the various candidates in the field to see who best meets that criteria.

Personal Best Regards:

The Democrat party is defunct. They went their way with the passing of our parents. It has morphed into the Euro-American Socialist party. Be smug if you wish, but it is tomorrow's generation that will have to live with the consequences of today's supposed progressives. :sad:

You are wrong. There IS federal law against what she did. I know because I worked for the Dept of State in IT. Make your ridiculously ignorant comments all you wish, but saying it doesn't make it so. Defend the criminal desperately. She has embarrassed your party and you have no one else to run, other than the admitted Socialist, Sanders. And he would NEVER get the Independent vote.

She has NO private emails once she admits that she was using the server for gov work. All her work becomes gov property, including anything private she puts on it. Sorry, but once again you have been proven wrong.

Should her email be turned over to a private party? NO. The IG should have first been involved and then if they deemed it possible of criminal mischief, they should have called in the FBI. Admittedly, the present FBI is controlled by the top criminal in the White House and it would immediately be buried. He doesn't want anyone to suspect his obvious incompetence. :spoken:

Wrong as usual. The Federal Records Act pertains. In addition, common sense applies ... except when criminal intent or just plain idiocy is involved. She's not an idiot so draw your own conclusions

Obviously confused when this was written. Perhaps someone should instruct this person on the primary process. And do you have any idea the difference between a socialist and a conservative? I suppose you are just joking around, because no one is legitimately that confused.

:agree:

Hillary needs not adhere to statutory law that the rest us must abide by. She is/was one of the Obama clan, so she receives special passes based on race, gender and sexual preference....which ever one or more pertains. They carry a handful of wild cards that they can use, declaring a free pass based on "bigotry" of anyone questioning their actions. Hillary does not care about becoming a leader of the greatest nation on earth. She wants to be the FIRST(1st) FEMALE in the position.

You worked in federal government in IT. I guess the IT department you worked in was illogical thought, or maybe insane turds.

There was no LAW forbidding her from using her personal computer from government business. Rule is not a law. That rule was made law recently, but not made retroactive. All of her emails sent to government email addresses were kept on the person receiving computer. If the emails she destroyed were classified information sent to non-government people, she broke the law, and will face criminal charges.

All personal emails become government property once she used the server for government business. This has to be the most ludicrous statement ever posted here, and there isn't a close second. OK, Mr. IT answer this. "Why did Trey Gowdy ask Hillary to send her server to an independent third party? If he had very right to view her private emails, why not send the server directly to him? I know, Trey Gowdy, the prosecutor, doesn't know the law. Trey Gowdy is a Obama plant in the Republican party and he loves her so much, and would do nothing to embarrass her.

I know the primary process is. I am an Independent. I can change my party affiliation, when entering the polling booth, and change it back, when I leave. So, can you. When you enter the polling booth change from Republican to Democrat. Vote for the Democrat that has the best chance to beat Hillary, but not the Republican nominee. Then, change back. If the nominees are Hillary, and any other Republican other than Kasich, I will place a write in vote for Donald Duck.

Since you are ignorant of the law, it is useless to argue with you. I find it humorous that every time a liberal is losing a debate, they lose their cool and resort to derogatory comments and name calling. So be it.
Hilary broke the law. There is no denying that. It's just a matter of how it will be handled. Most likely nothing will be done about it. Today's socialist party will not throw one of their own to the dogs unless they displease the emperor.
Florida and eighteen other states have Closed Primary Elections where only members of a political party may vote in their Party's primary. Either you are not old enough to vote yet and don't understand the procedure, or you are a resident voter from another state and trolling the Villages forum. Personally, I don't care. Perhaps you will learn something on here. If Florida has changed their Independent voting procedure, then I am sure that someone will correct me. The only time an Independent can vote is in the general election. And then anyone can vote for the candidate of their choice regardless of party. Personally, other than bragging rights (I guess) I see no purpose in registering as an Independent. Unless of course, you fear the stigma of being labeled a Democrat.

Heck, I have registered as a Republican so I can vote in their primary elections for the most ludicrous nimrod out there. :a20:

:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

You are so :censored: funny....only you think.

Me too. The only problem is deciding between all the ludicrous nimrods.

Congratulation:rolleyes:

Register to Vote or Update your Information - Division of Elections - Florida Department of State


All party changes must be completed by the registration deadline, which is 29 days before the primary election. No voter should go to the polls thinking they can change parties on election day at the polling place.

A true American who understands the principles upon which the country was founded, and would never think of mocking the system.

Walk proud.

Good luck with that. Mocking the system is how Obama got elected.

I knew I was right when I figured you to be ignorant or underage. Read back on your other post where you declared that you were an Independent. Do you mean registered Independent which means you are not a Republican, or Independent in like you are trying to move out of your parent's basement type independent?

He or she probably meant that his or her incoherent ramblings where independent of thought.

:D Good one.

Lose a debate. Hillary broke the law. How do you debate someone that throws out total false statements, and refuses to answer any question direct at them concerning the false statements? Then, they justify their stupidity by saying the President won't prosecute her, because she is one of her his own.

The only frustration that I have is thinking I am actually talking to adults. How come you didn't answer the question about Trey Gowdy? If Hillary's personal server was government property the second she used it for government business, why did he demand that Hillary send the server to an independent third party instead of himself? We know the answer to that question, her personal server ISN'T government property.

I am a resident of the friendliest home town in Florida. Just look at this site, and you can see how friendly everyone is especially the far right. Maybe the friendly behavior is only directed to people of their own ilk, and dare I say color. It is impossible to wipe the stupid smile off their face. That is why they can't answer any question directed at them. They don't want to lose the good mode they are always in. Any attempt to bring them back to the real world will result in naming calling of biblical proportion.

Unlike every far right closed minded individual here , I will admit, when I am wrong. Unlike the state, which I was a resident until 2012, Florida requires changing party affiliation 29 days before a primary. My former state didn't. So, I was wrong about the timing for changing parties. But the principle remains the same, I can vote for Sanders or Kasich. I just have to identify a party 29 days before the election. My man Kasich is in the Aug 6th debate, if the polls remain as is today. My man just to it in first gear. Bush and Walker pull over. You are about to be passed.

"The chairman of the House Committee on Benghazi is formally requesting Hillary Clinton turn over her private email server to a third party for a “neutral” investigation of its contents.


Rep. Trey Gowdy wrote to Clinton’s lawyer, David Kendall, Thursday asking the former secretary of state to make the server available to the State Department’s inspector general “or another neutral, detached, and independent arbiter.”



Read more: Trey Gowdy to Hillary Clinton lawyer: Turn over server to third party - Lauren French and Josh Gerstein - POLITICO

Knew you couldn't go away quietly. Had to make one more mindless attack on our community as a ploy to divert from the subject.
And Kasich is conservative so I doubt you would entertain a whim to vote for him, so that statement is hardly credible. If you are having a hard time trying to decide between a socialist and a conservative then you flip-flop more than the current resident in the White House. At any rate, it just lends more credence to what some on here thought of you, that you are a political troll. Of course, I could care less. Your posts are entertaining on a rainy and boring day.

You are so busy trying to attack anyone that doesn't agree with you that you turn around and make his case for him.

The original statement that was made by a former government IT person was, When Hillary used her personal server for government business, it became government property. Is there any doubt that that statement was made? Did I make up the above statement? Did I misinterpret the above statement? Is there any doubt what the statement says? No! Good! Let's proceed.

Look above at the statements highlighted in red. Now read what comes next very carefully, and very slowly. Logic 101. If Hillary's personal server was government property, why didn't Trey Gowdy request no demand that she send her former server, which is now government property, to HIM DIRECTLY? Why send it to a third party? All Hillary's personal emails on her former server were government property to do with as they saw fit. The only logical conclusion is Hillary's personal server is still her personal property, and not government property.

Concerning the person that highlighted items above in red, I am pretty sure you are a reasonable person. Do you think that Hillary's personal server became government property, when she used it for government business despite any evidence to the contrary?

Concerning the whatever that posted directly below him, what a matter didn't mommy give you enough attention, when you were a baby. This could be the sixth time that I said this. I will vote for a Republican governor that accepted the Medicaid provision under the ACA, because that governor puts the people in his state before his party. That is a man of character. I don't want Hillary to be the next president. That is why I would vote for Sanders. It has nothing to do with him, and everything to do with her. A vote for Sanders is a vote against Hillary. Please save your stupid statements for someone that actually gives a crap.

Ooo, don't have a temper tantrum. :cryin2:
You can't quite make up your mind, huh? Sanders-socialist or Kasich-conservative. What a conundrum, right?

I do not know what drives congress and their decisions regarding the Clinton felony. I do know this particular law, contrary to what you pretend to know. You seem to be hung up on diverting and possibly confusing someone off subject. If you didn't go off on a tangent, maybe you wouldn't be called out for your mistakes. Take a rest, you have earned your money for the night.

Poster keeps asking the same question......why was the server not asked to be sent direct.

Twice now, the poster got the answer....next time Mike it brighter red and even bigger.

Gowdy is a smart lawer, former D.A. and federal prosecutor. He will do all by the book.