In a new directive issued by the Sec. of Education John King to Universities and Colleges across America ---- what we once knew as " criminals " are actually " Justice Involved Individuals " and should be compassionately referred to as such .

No more criminals ! They no longer exist ! Now who said that this Administration was soft on crime ?

They have eliminated it ! It just no longer exists ! Problem solved!
Next ............. !

Originally Posted by Guest

In a new directive issued by the Sec. of Education John King to Universities and Colleges across America ---- what we once knew as " criminals " are actually " Justice Involved Individuals " and should be compassionately referred to as such .

No more criminals ! They no longer exist ! Now who said that this Administration was soft on crime ?

They have eliminated it ! It just no longer exists ! Problem solved!
Next ............. !

They have also re-defined the meaning of "illegal", and for sure don't ever say the word "terrorist".

It`s only fair to get rid of these old outdated labels which only serve to hurt people and hold them back from being main-streamed into society at large . They have already paid their debt . It`s not fair to label them for the rest of their days .

Originally Posted by Guest

It`s only fair to get rid of these old outdated labels which only serve to hurt people and hold them back from being main-streamed into society at large . They have already paid their debt . It`s not fair to label them for the rest of their days .

It`s a very Progressive concept that you will only experience when the correct people are in power .

The reason they (the democrats) want to relabel crinmals, felons, and illegals is for the votes. They are the poster boys for these groups due to they're last breath the remain in office. They could give rats a$$ about them. But , if the crimnals, felons, and illegals all vote republician you would see different view.

Bottom line they will appease anybody that will vote for them to keep them in office, why? They couldn't do real job! But, can make up and lie out the teeth. The zombies brain dead following keep them in office along with brain washing youth starting in kindergarden. Yes, I am talking about teachers and teachers unions. Any republician teacher knows to keep they're affiliation unknown due to the discrimination.

Originally Posted by Guest

The reason they (the democrats) want to relabel crinmals, felons, and illegals is for the votes. They are the poster boys for these groups due to they're last breath the remain in office. They could give rats a$$ about them. But , if the crimnals, felons, and illegals all vote republician you would see different view.

Bottom line they will appease anybody that will vote for them to keep them in office, why? They couldn't do real job! But, can make up and lie out the teeth. The zombies brain dead following keep them in office along with brain washing youth starting in kindergarden. Yes, I am talking about teachers and teachers unions. Any republician teacher knows to keep they're affiliation unknown due to the discrimination.

You got that right -- all of it !

They HAVE to relabel the terms so that they can justify voting for Hillary, the felonious criminal.

I've stocked up on ammo and I have plenty of wooded land to hide the bodies of those wishing to limit my freedom. It will be the anti-gun liberals that will be victim of the no-longer called criminal element, not me or mine. Between abortion and coddling criminals, liberals will eventually become extinct in America. Then, we will just have to clean up after them and place their bones in museums as lesson guides/tools for future generations. Of course, I am just joking....right?

Originally Posted by Guest

It`s only fair to get rid of these old outdated labels which only serve to hurt people and hold them back from being main-streamed into society at large . They have already paid their debt . It`s not fair to label them for the rest of their days .

What a load of crap. Changing the name is not going to change how people perceive another person...

Take for instance the change from Negro to Blacks to African Americans; no change in the reaction when they are looking at a house next door to yours in a non black area - fear that property values are going to slide.

Originally Posted by Guest

What a load of crap. Changing the name is not going to change how people perceive another person...

Take for instance the change from Negro to Blacks to African Americans; no change in the reaction when they are looking at a house next door to yours in a non black area - fear that property values are going to slide.

For PC purposes, in the future please refer to me as an European American. I am special and I insist on being treated with all the benefits of any other minority.

Originally Posted by Guest

What a load of crap. Changing the name is not going to change how people perceive another person...

Take for instance the change from Negro to Blacks to African Americans; no change in the reaction when they are looking at a house next door to yours in a non black area - fear that property values are going to slide.

And slide they do...always...why? Why does the neighborhood ALWAYS go to crap as more and more move in? They never start moving in and the neighborhood gets better...never. It's the actions not the color.

Originally Posted by Guest

In a new directive issued by the Sec. of Education John King to Universities and Colleges across America ---- what we once knew as " criminals " are actually " Justice Involved Individuals " and should be compassionately referred to as such .

No more criminals ! They no longer exist ! Now who said that this Administration was soft on crime ?

They have eliminated it ! It just no longer exists ! Problem solved!
Next ............. !

Obama doesn’t think rapists, armed robbers, drug dealers are criminals | New York Post

Seems kind of bone-headed.

Originally Posted by Guest

It`s only fair to get rid of these old outdated labels which only serve to hurt people and hold them back from being main-streamed into society at large . They have already paid their debt . It`s not fair to label them for the rest of their days .

And "hurting" them is supposed to bother me, how? Personally, I don't want them "mainstreamed" back into society. Tell you what, AFTER they serve their time, give them a job in the military, let them serve overseas, and when/if they complete their enlistment without any problem, THEN think about "mainstreaming" them back into society. Otherwise, who cares? Why should I be concerned with the feelings of a scumbag, whether or not he served his time?

You don't make a man into a woman or a scumbag into a model citizen just by giving them a different name. You liberals need to face reality, and accept it. You can put powdered sugar on dog manure and it will not make it a pastry. But, you are certainly invited to prove me wrong.

Black is black I want my baby back.

You TAG people and after a while that's all anyone remembers. Nothing new going on.

"By now, everyone knows assigning nicknames to opponents is Donald Trump’s trademark political strategy, and this week Hillary Clinton got hers. For as long as Trump is in this presidential race, and maybe beyond, Clinton will be, in the minds of some voters, “Crooked Hillary” in the same way that Marco Rubio became “Little Marco” and Ted Cruz has been “Lyin’ Ted.”

Trump doesn’t have to back up those designations with deeper content to make them stick. These insults require no additional information beyond knowing what the names are meant to imply. And the implications here aren’t subtle."
‘Little Marco,’ ‘Lyin’ Ted,’ ‘Crooked Hillary:’ How Donald Trump makes name calling stick - The Washington Post

In doling out these simple nicknames, Trump appeals to that human instinct to categorize and label as a way to have stability and certainty.