Certainly, the police were justified in the killing of the sniper who killed 5 or more police officers during the otherwise peaceful and legal protest.

However, while a robot device with a bomb detonating near the shooter was definitely the safest way of taking out the shooter - was it totally safe for the area? By that, I mean, did the Dallas police know for a CERTAINITY that there were not people being held hostage by another person in the sniper's immediate region? What would have been the repercussions if there had been 100 hostages in the immediate area and they were also killed by the remote control bomb?

Anyhow, condolences go to the families of the police officers killed in this senseless shooting.

The two killings of Black men by police officers does not justify revenge killings by anyone.

Originally Posted by Guest

Certainly, the police were justified in the killing of the sniper who killed 5 or more police officers during the otherwise peaceful and legal protest.

However, while a robot device with a bomb detonating near the shooter was definitely the safest way of taking out the shooter - was it totally safe for the area? By that, I mean, did the Dallas police know for a CERTAINITY that there were not people being held hostage by another person in the sniper's immediate region? What would have been the repercussions if there had been 100 hostages in the immediate area and they were also killed by the remote control bomb?

Anyhow, condolences go to the families of the police officers killed in this senseless shooting.

The two killings of Black men by police officers does not justify revenge killings by anyone.

I think you speculative questioning after the fact for something that did not happen undermines the excellent job Dallas Law Enforcement accomplished eliminating a domestic terrorist.

Originally Posted by Guest

Certainly, the police were justified in the killing of the sniper who killed 5 or more police officers during the otherwise peaceful and legal protest.

However, while a robot device with a bomb detonating near the shooter was definitely the safest way of taking out the shooter - was it totally safe for the area? By that, I mean, did the Dallas police know for a CERTAINITY that there were not people being held hostage by another person in the sniper's immediate region? What would have been the repercussions if there had been 100 hostages in the immediate area and they were also killed by the remote control bomb?

Anyhow, condolences go to the families of the police officers killed in this senseless shooting.

The two killings of Black men by police officers does not justify revenge killings by anyone.

The RIOTERS declared WAR. Snipers in position shooting at cops.

Your suggestion coulda, mighta. Realize that it is far easier to sit at your computer and second guess. Had the cops brought in armored vehicles the LIBS as the've done in the past would have been screaming bloody murder.

[QUOTE=Guest;1251393]The RIOTERS declared WAR. Snipers in position shooting at cops.
QUOTE]


There was NO rioting! There were protestors in a peaceful march.

Terrible that two snipers took extremely unlawful actions.

Protest marches also took place in other cities such as New York and Washington,DC. There was NO RIOTING. These people were entirely withing their Constitutional rights - until, of course, when 2 snipers killed the policemen.

Originally Posted by Guest

Certainly, the police were justified in the killing of the sniper who killed 5 or more police officers during the otherwise peaceful and legal protest.

However, while a robot device with a bomb detonating near the shooter was definitely the safest way of taking out the shooter - was it totally safe for the area? By that, I mean, did the Dallas police know for a CERTAINITY that there were not people being held hostage by another person in the sniper's immediate region? What would have been the repercussions if there had been 100 hostages in the immediate area and they were also killed by the remote control bomb?

Anyhow, condolences go to the families of the police officers killed in this senseless shooting.

The two killings of Black men by police officers does not justify revenge killings by anyone.

Don't want to read anymore in your post than you intended but need to ask if you believe white cops are bias and looking to kill blacks? Why are cops at a heighten sense of concern for their safety when deal with a young black man. If you believe it is prejudice than you and I disagree. I believe the root cause is violent crime committed by black men, life experience.

Originally Posted by Guest

Don't want to read anymore in your post than you intended but need to ask if you believe white cops are bias and looking to kill blacks? Why are cops at a heighten sense of concern for their safety when deal with a young black man. If you believe it is prejudice than you and I disagree. I believe the root cause is violent crime committed by black men, life experience.

No, I don't think there is a widespread bias on the part of white cops.

The two recent killings of black men by police were caught on camera. The one in Minnesota was killed by a policeman who obviously panicked when the black man said he had a carry permit and a gun in the car when he was pulled over for a broken tail light. The second one in Louisiana was handcuffed and on the ground when the officer shot him several times at point blank range.

Does Black Lives Matter have a right to peaceful marches? Yes!
Is any rioting or looting permissable? No, that is criminal and should be prosecuted.

From what I read, the shooter, Micha Johnson, would have been automatically eligible to get a CCW if he lived in Florida. He was an honorably discharged veteran and did not have a criminal record. He would not have needed any classes but just a fingerprint check, his DD214, and about $115.

Does that make anyone uneasy?

Originally Posted by Guest

From what I read, the shooter, Micha Johnson, would have been automatically eligible to get a CCW if he lived in Florida. He was an honorably discharged veteran and did not have a criminal record. He would not have needed any classes but just a fingerprint check, his DD214, and about $115.

Does that make anyone uneasy?

What difference does it really make? It only proves that someone doesn't need a concealed carry permit to murder someone.

Black lives matter was peaceful? Tell that to the police that had their head quarters spray painted. Tell that to the police that have to hear them chant "kill them, pigs in a blanket, kill them now." We are on the verge of a racial war thanks in part to Obama that eggs it on with his racial divisiveness.

More whites are killed by cops than blacks. Just because a black killing is sensationalized by the liberal media does not make these white cops racists. If it was a black cop that killed those two, it would not be in the news. The only reason the family even cares, half the time, is for the money they can extort from the state. Just a better form of welfare for them. I am not saying that these two cops were right. But, they do deserve a right to explain themselves without everyone assuming that they are racists. They could have just been wrong, without being racists.

I hear this thing about blacks being stopped for tail light out, like that is a racist thing. I have been stopped by the cops for a taillight out also. And they also do a computer check for warrants whenever they make a stop. You want to make a big deal out of blacks being stopped? Then, how about making a big deal out of whites being stopped also, so that you are deemed racist? YES, there is profiling by the police. That usually makes them better at deterring crime. If someone's feelings are hurt, they are probably taking it the wrong way.

The killer in Dallas said he hated white people. He also shot a black woman. He was a mental case. Nothing more. It does not have to be a political thing. He had a death wish and he decided to take some cops out with him. He had a perception that cops wanted to kill blacks, so in his warped mind, he decided to attack first. Maybe I am wrong, and maybe we don't know enough about the killings yet. This is just my opinion, but Oblunder should not have gone on TV and announced to the world that COPs generally persecute blacks more than whites, and that the cause of killings is guns.

Originally Posted by Guest

Don't want to read anymore in your post than you intended but need to ask if you believe white cops are bias and looking to kill blacks? Why are cops at a heighten sense of concern for their safety when deal with a young black man. If you believe it is prejudice than you and I disagree. I believe the root cause is violent crime committed by black men, life experience.

You're a racist if you think that way...they're innocent and if they do become violent, it's our fault.

Life experience also taught us how worthless they are.

Originally Posted by Guest

From what I read, the shooter, Micha Johnson, would have been automatically eligible to get a CCW if he lived in Florida. He was an honorably discharged veteran and did not have a criminal record. He would not have needed any classes but just a fingerprint check, his DD214, and about $115.

Does that make anyone uneasy?

Being black is a better predictor of violence than anything else. Ben THEM for having guns and you eliminate 80-90% of the gun violence. But nobody will admit that...

Originally Posted by Guest

Black lives matter was peaceful? Tell that to the police that had their head quarters spray painted. Tell that to the police that have to hear them chant "kill them, pigs in a blanket, kill them now." We are on the verge of a racial war thanks in part to Obama that eggs it on with his racial divisiveness.

More whites are killed by cops than blacks. Just because a black killing is sensationalized by the liberal media does not make these white cops racists. If it was a black cop that killed those two, it would not be in the news. The only reason the family even cares, half the time, is for the money they can extort from the state. Just a better form of welfare for them. I am not saying that these two cops were right. But, they do deserve a right to explain themselves without everyone assuming that they are racists. They could have just been wrong, without being racists.

I hear this thing about blacks being stopped for tail light out, like that is a racist thing. I have been stopped by the cops for a taillight out also. And they also do a computer check for warrants whenever they make a stop. You want to make a big deal out of blacks being stopped? Then, how about making a big deal out of whites being stopped also, so that you are deemed racist? YES, there is profiling by the police. That usually makes them better at deterring crime. If someone's feelings are hurt, they are probably taking it the wrong way.

The killer in Dallas said he hated white people. He also shot a black woman. He was a mental case. Nothing more. It does not have to be a political thing. He had a death wish and he decided to take some cops out with him. He had a perception that cops wanted to kill blacks, so in his warped mind, he decided to attack first. Maybe I am wrong, and maybe we don't know enough about the killings yet. This is just my opinion, but Oblunder should not have gone on TV and announced to the world that COPs generally persecute blacks more than whites, and that the cause of killings is guns.

Racism is a one way street...only WE can be racist. I'm almost looking forward to a civil breakdown so we can SOLVE this minority problem once and for all.

Originally Posted by Guest

You're a racist if you think that way...they're innocent and if they do become violent, it's our fault.

Life experience also taught us how worthless they are.



Being black is a better predictor of violence than anything else. Ben THEM for having guns and you eliminate 80-90% of the gun violence. But nobody will admit that...



Racism is a one way street...only WE can be racist. I'm almost looking forward to a civil breakdown so we can SOLVE this minority problem once and for all.

Then start at the top and work down until you get to the innocents. There is no reason that innocents need to be involved when it is all the political hacks at the top that are agitating, as well as the media. We were much better off before Obama. He has set racial tensions back to the 60's all by himself.

As Joe Friday would put it....just the facts !

The joker in the WH defaults to his agenda on guns and as usual wrong in doing so.

The guns are not the problem.

The single biggest change in gun ownership that wouls make a significant difference is simply not allowing blacks to obtain, own or be in the vicinity of a gun.

Gun crime percentages will drop like a rock.

And as is always the case will have no effect on the random wacko that goes into a gun free zone and murders a bunch of innocents. There are no laws that will prevent this.

But blacks with guns. Like it or not is the major problem.
Greatest percentage of prison in mates? Black.
Greatest number of killing each other? Blacks.

If we can't get the joker in the WH to state that islamic terrorism is a threat to America. How would he ever state that gun violence among blacks is also a threat to America.

If a red headed person were seen commiting a murder, the proflie would include stating the perp had red hair. And like it or not every person with red hair would be scrutinized.

So why is it a big deal when most murders, rapes, shootings, robberies, commited by blacks......to state the perp(s) were black (again) and look for a black person.

Instead of the so called protestors or pseudo rioters marching in the streets erroneously reported in the media as the representation of the race.........the peaceful law abiding blacks need to stand and be counted and rise up and take their own to task.

That silent majority is as likely to do something as the majority silent majority in America does.....NOTHING!!

America gets what it deserves. Criminal politicians, degrading freedoms and a also ran America!!!.

I predicted a Civil War II months ago, how far fetched was I?

Racial tensions are at an all time high, 52% of this country is receiving government assistance, we have 3 generation of families that have never worked a day in their lives living in HUD and they have developed a sense of entitlement, we will have a 20 trillion dollar debt when Obamma leaves office, the checks will stop and those people will take what they feel they are owed. STOCK UP ON AMMO!

The race baiter is talking to himself and answering himself AGAIN just to make it look like others are agreeing with his crazy ideas and his tin foil hat notions.

He wants to take Constitutional rights away from an entire race of people. Sounds a little Hitler-like, doesn't he?

Well, there are some wack jobs living in The Villages, just like you will find some wack jobs in New York, San Francisco, or Des Moines.

If this racist wack job on TOTV is so adamant about his ideas, why does he cower in back of a keyboard and not let everyone know who he really is?

Originally Posted by Guest

why does he cower in back of a keyboard and not let everyone know who he really is?

You should probably teach him a lesson by example, why don't you sign your name to your posts?