USGA goofed up again

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-10-2016, 09:24 PM
JGVillages JGVillages is offline
Gold member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: TV Calumet Grove
Posts: 1,204
Thanks: 75
Thanked 895 Times in 221 Posts
Default USGA goofed up again

Anna Norqvist was assessed a 2 stroke penalty in the Women's US Open 3 hole total stroke playoff today when on the 2nd playoff hole, #17, in a fairway sand trap she inavertaintly grounded her club. Ok justified. It is the way the penalty was seen and the notification process the USGA needs to revise. Thinking she and Brittnay Lang were even hitting their 3rd shots to 18 the USGA let Norqvist hit without notification. Immediately after that shot she was told. They then notified Lang prior to her 3rd shot, basically telling her she had a 2 stroke lead. She now was aware that she did not need to be aggresive and try to make birdie to win. If Norqvist had the same information prior to her 3rd shot she would have to be aggressive, knowing she was 2 strokes behind. All the USGA needed to do was notify both after their 3rd shots so Lang did not have an advantage on her 3rd shot. Considering the screw-up at the men's US Open and now this, not only to the rules of golf need revisiting but also their penalty notification process. How many players not "on camera" may deserve unseen (by player and camera) penalties that are not assessed and later go on to cash big checks or win. Penalties should not be assessed by callers seeing it on TV or a camera tech in a trailer noticing it. The entire field needs to be protected so let the players, their opponents, and the on-course officials see the issue and make the decision real time. PROTECT THE FIELD.
  #2  
Old 07-10-2016, 09:48 PM
Jima64 Jima64 is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,545
Thanks: 161
Thanked 219 Times in 83 Posts
Default

Doesn't each player have a official following them on the course. If so, how would players be able to,"cheat" and go on to cash big checks? Players seem to have a entourage with them the final round.
  #3  
Old 07-11-2016, 04:04 AM
rubicon rubicon is offline
Email Reported As Spam
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 13,694
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Default

The first person to know their club was mistakenly grounded is the player so where is the surprise. Golf use to be about honor about self reporting infractions. It is what makes this sport very special. Ethics is about doing the right thing even if no one is watching.
  #4  
Old 07-11-2016, 05:50 AM
VApeople VApeople is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,258
Thanks: 202
Thanked 1,830 Times in 687 Posts
Default

On the replay, it showed that her club moved only one or two grains of sand, so she probably was not even aware she had grounded her club.
  #5  
Old 07-11-2016, 12:25 PM
JGVillages JGVillages is offline
Gold member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: TV Calumet Grove
Posts: 1,204
Thanks: 75
Thanked 895 Times in 221 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jima64 View Post
Doesn't each player have a official following them on the course. If so, how would players be able to,"cheat" and go on to cash big checks? Players seem to have a entourage with them the final round.
During the regular 4 rounds of a tournament each player does not have an official in their group. An official is called in by the walking scorers when needed. I did not say anyone was cheating. Nordqvist did not see her infraction as the small grain of sand that moved was unseen by her but picked up by a zooming TV camera. If a similar infraction happened to a different player, on a different hole, that the camera operator did not record, the infraction would have gone unreported and the player would not have been penalized. Infractions happen that players do not intend or realize it happened. You should not penalize one player because it was caught on camera, while another escapes a penalty because their infraction, unnoticed by the player, was not on camera. Are we to let fans call infractions into an NFL Game, that the officials missed, thus reviewing something that may have happened in the first quarter, then penalizing or take points off in the 4th Qr.?
  #6  
Old 07-11-2016, 01:46 PM
er9027 er9027 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 113
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Actually, the replay shows the track in the sand that the club left on the way back also. Penalty was correct. Should have informed both players at same time...Either before 3rd shot, after 3rd shot, or b-4 they putted.
I'm not sure there is anything in rules about " Inform Players Asap or Inform all players together " . Might be in future after problems this year. High Def TV has sure made a big difference. I trust 99.9 % of the players to
call penalties on themselves. Golf is a game of honor and lets keep it that way. IMHO
  #7  
Old 07-11-2016, 01:50 PM
Jima64 Jima64 is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,545
Thanks: 161
Thanked 219 Times in 83 Posts
Default rules for all

Non golfer here but love watching on television. Rules should also include when and how you tell someone of a penalty. Don't they have tour officials follow each golfer during play. if so, why the missed call until notified by video replay?
  #8  
Old 07-11-2016, 02:06 PM
justjim justjim is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Illinois, Tennesee, Florida, Village of Caroline, Sanibel, LaBelle
Posts: 6,093
Thanks: 60
Thanked 1,738 Times in 732 Posts
Default Officials are not that close to see a rules violation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jima64 View Post
Non golfer here but love watching on television. Rules should also include when and how you tell someone of a penalty. Don't they have tour officials follow each golfer during play. if so, why the missed call until notified by video replay?
Officials are not so close that they can see an infraction of the rules of golf such as occurred in this case. Apparently, the player didn't even notice she had brushed the sand with her club. It was a zoom lens on the TV camera that caught the infraction. However, both players should be informed at the same time but there is nothing in the "rules of golf" that says they should and this can be changed by the USGA.
__________________
Most people are as happy as they make up their mind to be. Abraham Lincoln
  #9  
Old 07-11-2016, 02:11 PM
ajbrown's Avatar
ajbrown ajbrown is offline
Sage
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mallory Square (9 months/year), TBD the rest
Posts: 2,641
Thanks: 12
Thanked 21 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VApeople View Post
On the replay, it showed that her club moved only one or two grains of sand, so she probably was not even aware she had grounded her club.
I agree. Watching the video, I doubt she felt it. Only she knows if she saw it. I will believe (hope) she did not or she would have said something.

I was surprised how close she allowed the club to get at all; even if she did not touch that tiny clump. Possibly she missed the fact that the ball created a little 'valley' as it rolled to rest?

For those that have not seen it check out the continuous loop video on this page.

SB*Nation article
__________________
.
Photobucket has changed their site from free for years to now blocking your photos, shame on them and will have to find new way to post albums I have.

Last edited by ajbrown; 07-11-2016 at 02:24 PM.
  #10  
Old 07-12-2016, 06:11 AM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 14,935
Thanks: 7,494
Thanked 6,162 Times in 3,166 Posts
Default

I'm on the fence on this one. If officials called it, it means they have officials watching cameras. I'f so, IMO play should of been stopped, reviewed, and both player notified. You know like replay officials in other sports. I also think she did not feel the club hitting couple grains of sand. It the sand was fluffy enough the air moving from the club could left the trail.
  #11  
Old 07-12-2016, 06:56 AM
Mikeod's Avatar
Mikeod Mikeod is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Caroline
Posts: 5,021
Thanks: 0
Thanked 49 Times in 27 Posts
Default

The trail was from the ball rolling when it entered the bunker, not from the club on the backswing.
__________________
"the difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
  #12  
Old 07-12-2016, 01:41 PM
goldseekur goldseekur is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 249
Thanks: 1,690
Thanked 40 Times in 18 Posts
Default

I personally do not think that a camera person covering the game should not have been able to call this. Only the players and officials of the game should be allowed to call the penalty. If no one who is a "part of the game" sees it, then it doesn't matter.

I do not think she noticed the few grains of sand move, nor did anyone else associated with the game. That camera person had that stroke zoomed in so close that all you saw was the club face and the ball. I would imagine if most shots was zoomed in that close something wrong could be picked up. So if they are going to say it is OK to penalize her because of what a camera person picked up, then they need to have EVERY sand shot done the same way so it is equal.

I agree also that the officials did not handle the delivery of the information to the players properly. The way they did it gave Brittney a BIG advantage on her next shot. She changed clubs after receiving the news because she knew then she did not have to play aggressively because she knew she already had a 2 stoke lead.
  #13  
Old 07-12-2016, 04:01 PM
Dr Winston O Boogie jr's Avatar
Dr Winston O Boogie jr Dr Winston O Boogie jr is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7,940
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2,157 Times in 772 Posts
Default

Quote:
I was surprised how close she allowed the club to get at all; even if she did not touch that tiny clump.
I was thinking the same thing. I always hover my club well above the sand in a bunker to ensure I don't have an "accident". In fact I do it sometimes when chipping and pitching. It's a drill that Paul Runyan taught me many years ago.

I'm on the fence about calling penalties based on video evidence. As has been brought up, how do we know that Brittany Lang didn't accidentally commit some small infraction at some point during the first three rounds. It makes me wonder how many infraction occur that the player isn't aware of over the course of a tournament or over the course of a season.

I knew a rules official once who claimed that he could take any professional golfer and call a rules infraction on him within three holes. There are probably a lot of minor infractions that players are not aware of. It's just a matter of bad luck when you happen to be in the lead or in a playoff and your every move is being recorded and looked at by television technicians.

I agree that they should have told both players either before Nordqvist hit her shot or after Lang hit hers. I doubt that it would have made any difference in the outcome, but it was the right thing to do.
__________________
The Beatlemaniacs of The Villages meet every Friday 10:00am at the O'Dell Recreation Center.

"I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend." - Thomas Jefferson to William Hamilton, April 22, 1800.

Last edited by Dr Winston O Boogie jr; 07-12-2016 at 04:09 PM.
Closed Thread

Tags
3rd, usga, shot, camera, norqvist


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 PM.