Harvard professor calls for Electoral College to vote for Clinton - The Boston Globe

"The votes may have all been cast in the presidential election, but the electoral college isn’t set to vote until mid-December. And a Harvard professor is arguing that rather than vote for Donald Trump, the clear electoral vote winner, electors should instead buck tradition and tap Hillary Clinton as our nation’s next president."

It COULD happen...if Trump is REALLY a rogue, he won't be elected. The "system" WILL go on.

Originally Posted by Guest

Harvard professor calls for Electoral College to vote for Clinton - The Boston Globe

"The votes may have all been cast in the presidential election, but the electoral college isn’t set to vote until mid-December. And a Harvard professor is arguing that rather than vote for Donald Trump, the clear electoral vote winner, electors should instead buck tradition and tap Hillary Clinton as our nation’s next president."

It COULD happen...if Trump is REALLY a rogue, he won't be elected. The "system" WILL go on.

ANYWAY to win is making a lot of Democrats appear to be CHEATING, now that they have established they are sore losers. Have y'all no grace at all?

No. That would set a bad precedent for the future elections. I am no fan of Donald Trump and his hateful rhetoric but he should be given a chance to see what he can do with the Office he won from the tallied votes for Electors.

He might also be a much better prospect for my massive 224 613 Project as it does have a lot of anti-Establishment aspects. It is arming citizens with the best resources for information through libraries. Hillary Clinton is a player in that Establishment and probably would have used all kinds of tricks to make sure that the Project really did not flourish. I will have to see if Donald Trump is all talk or if he really believes about draining the swamp.

BS thread not worthy of response and wasting keystrokes.

Originally Posted by taltarzac725

...hillary clinton is a player in that establishment and probably would have used all kinds of tricks to make sure that the project really did not flourish...

Bwaaaaaaaaahahahahaha!!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

No. That would set a bad precedent for the future elections. I am no fan of Donald Trump and his hateful rhetoric but he should be given a chance to see what he can do with the Office he won from the tallied votes for Electors.

He might also be a much better prospect for my massive 224 613 Project as it does have a lot of anti-Establishment aspects. It is arming citizens with the best resources for information through libraries. Hillary Clinton is a player in that Establishment and probably would have used all kinds of tricks to make sure that the Project really did not flourish. I will have to see if Donald Trump is all talk or if he really believes about draining the swamp.

Trump is part of the system, he won't be "elected" by the EC if he isn't. They're not going to just give up their power. It was reality TV, the whole "rogue" thing. The R party played us. Trump will borrow and spend a LOT more than Obama. Hopefully they'll do infrastructure, we can use it. Hopefully he'll do a lot of things, but I'm not holding me breath.

Originally Posted by Guest

No. That would set a bad precedent for the future elections. I am no fan of Donald Trump and his hateful rhetoric but he should be given a chance to see what he can do with the Office he won from the tallied votes for Electors.

He might also be a much better prospect for my massive 224 613 Project as it does have a lot of anti-Establishment aspects. It is arming citizens with the best resources for information through libraries. Hillary Clinton is a player in that Establishment and probably would have used all kinds of tricks to make sure that the Project really did not flourish. I will have to see if Donald Trump is all talk or if he really believes about draining the swamp.

I don't get it. If this is your life's work and it means so much to you, why did you support Hillary? Just wondering.......

Originally Posted by Guest

I don't get it. If this is your life's work and it means so much to you, why did you support Hillary? Just wondering.......

My 224 613 Project involves hundreds of thousands of people. I do not speak for them but have tried to get them involved with advocating certain ideas. Mainly about creating a dialog among many different professionals -- not just law librarians and lawyers-- about the practical needs of information for survivors/victims of crimes connected to libraries and the Internet. I vote for whomever I feel would follow my personal beliefs about politics. I am a life long Democrat. If a life long Republican wants to get involved with the 224 613 Project-- and many are-- that's fine with me. Many Republicans have helped me over the almost 26 years I have been doing this work. I have no idea what Donald Trump is going to do about much of anything. We will see what he does in January 2017. He seems to also dialog with a lot of people before making serious decisions which is a good thing. But my vote is MY vote and not the vote of others in the 224 613 Project. I am for a woman's right to chose, against actions that will hurt the environment and many other tenets of the Democrats.

Part of this Project also is fighting against some very dirty tricks played on me by the two-party Establishment. I am very interested in just what Donald Trump has to say about "draining the swamp" and what he actually does in that regard.

Also my Project involves whom I have worked for and when and where and the kind of inter-actions I had with these people while fighting for the practical needs of information for survivors/victims of crimes. It is a very complicated story but quite well documented as I was trained to do while a student and then Student Director for Legal Assistance to Minnesota Prisoners at the University of Minnesota Law School. Some of the law professors there liked what I was doing; the majority did not. Arming people with access to very practical information does threaten lawyers' control of the dialog as you would have more people asking intelligent and well-informed questions in the legal process and not being so easily manipulated.

There seems to be more and more people though interested in mitigating the ability of lawyers to control the conversation. Better informed jury members for instance BEFORE they even go into the court room is one aspect of this. I am not arguing for chaos in the courtroom that would harm the pursuit of justice in the jurors trying to get at the truth in a certain case or at least as that is humanly possibly given the limitations of any particular situation.

Originally Posted by Guest

My 224 613 Project involves hundreds of thousands of people. I do not speak for them but have tried to get them involved with advocating certain ideas. Mainly about creating a dialog among many different professionals -- not just law librarians and lawyers-- about the practical needs of information for survivors/victims of crimes connected to libraries and the Internet. I vote for whomever I feel would follow my personal beliefs about politics. I am a life long Democrat. If a life long Republican wants to get involved with the 224 613 Project-- and many are-- that's fine with me. Many Republicans have helped me over the almost 26 years I have been doing this work. I have no idea what Donald Trump is going to do about much of anything. We will see what he does in January 2017. He seems to also dialog with a lot of people before making serious decisions which is a good thing. But my vote is MY vote and not the vote of others in the 224 613 Project. I am for a woman's right to chose, against actions that will hurt the environment and many other tenets of the Democrats.

Part of this Project also is fighting against some very dirty tricks played on me by the two-party Establishment. I am very interested in just what Donald Trump has to say about "draining the swamp" and what he actually does in that regard.

Also my Project involves whom I have worked for and when and where and the kind of inter-actions I had with these people while fighting for the practical needs of information for survivors/victims of crimes. It is a very complicated story but quite well documented as I was trained to do while a student and then Student Director for Legal Assistance to Minnesota Prisoners at the University of Minnesota Law School. Some of the law professors there liked what I was doing; the majority did not. Arming people with access to very practical information does threaten lawyers' control of the dialog as you would have more people asking intelligent and well-informed questions in the legal process and no being so easily manipulated.

Still confused, but that's ok, no need to pursue this. I'm thinking that our ideas regarding being passionate about something might be different, but probably not an appropriate conversation to have on this forum. Have a good day!

Originally Posted by Guest

Trump is part of the system, he won't be "elected" by the EC if he isn't. They're not going to just give up their power. It was reality TV, the whole "rogue" thing. The R party played us. Trump will borrow and spend a LOT more than Obama. Hopefully they'll do infrastructure, we can use it. Hopefully he'll do a lot of things, but I'm not holding me breath.

He does not seem to be part of the system. It seems mostly about this man's ego and his desire to be loved by many people.

Clinton would be more of the same government with tweeks here-and-there.

Whether or not Trump can change Washington though is the $1,000,000,000 question. Many have gone in saying they would and instead they change to accommodate the reality of the beltway which has little to do with the actual reality outside of it.

Originally Posted by Guest

Still confused, but that's ok, no need to pursue this. I'm thinking that our ideas regarding being passionate about something might be different, but probably not an appropriate conversation to have on this forum. Have a good day!

It is very easy to find some of the documents I have put up on the Internet. And I have had some help over the years with whom to get involved in this. I have been doing this work in MN, IL, CA, and FL but with many contacts in TX, NY, DC, KY, HI, AK and various other states especially NV and CO.

I started out with this Project by writing 4000 or so victim/witness assistance centers all over the United States about what they would like to see in law libraries for victims/survivors of crimes. I do not just accept what law librarians or lawyers tell me are these needs. You ask the people you are trying to help directly and not count on what some academic says are their needs. This took me a few years though. I then used their responses to try to change the hearts and minds of these academics and law librarians and also tried to get Hollywood and the media involved. They can be very creative with how they solve problems like this. Mainly through telling human interest stories.

Oh well, IF the electorals decided to go the other way, they country would be in an uproar and we would have a civil war. Fine with me. Time to drain the swamp. Might was well literally drain it of liberals that do not support the Constitution. WE have plenty of immigrants to take their places. By the way, ammo appears to be on sale.

Originally Posted by Guest

It is very easy to find some of the documents I have put up on the Internet. And I have had some help over the years with whom to get involved in this. I have been doing this work in MN, IL, CA, and FL but with many contacts in TX, NY, DC, KY, HI, AK and various other states especially NV and CO.

I started out with this Project by writing 4000 or so victim/witness assistance centers all over the United States about what they would like to see in law libraries for victims/survivors of crimes. I do not just accept what law librarians or lawyers tell me are these needs. You ask the people you are trying to help directly and not count on what some academic says are their needs. This took me a few years though. I then used their responses to try to change the hearts and minds of these academics and law librarians and also tried to get Hollywood and the media involved. They can be very creative with how they solve problems like this. Mainly through telling human interest stories.

Best way to help those victims is to issue them weapons and give them instruction on how to use them proficiently. How many CCW victims do you know?

Should the electoral college go rogue? The immediate response to the question depends on whose ox is being gored.

A deeper response would consider the primary reason as to why the founders established the electoral college.

Clearly for better than 200 hundreds the electoral college has served us well and that the relinquishing of power from one party to the next has been peaceful and orderly. This civil relinquishment is one of our greatest gifts from the founders and the envy of the world

So given the invaluable value of the electoral college to preserve this Republic one might ask why and who are making a demand for the dissolution of the electoral college?

Jill Stein's demand for a recount in my view serves her threefold. first she gathers campaign money for future campaigns. Secondly she gains more face recognition. Third I have a gut feeling that she is working in the background with Clinton people, environmentalist, feminist and globalist to damage Trump's reputation.

The alphabet/liberal news outlets CNN< NBC< ABC and their affiliatates are spreading misinformation here and abroad in an attempt to discredit Trump.

We are all witnessing just how unhinged many progressives really are . Jill Stein is a radical nazi feminist unshaven armpits and all.

Its one thing to protest but these are radical that are committing crimes and bent on tearing down this nation

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Best way to help those victims is to issue them weapons and give them instruction on how to use them proficiently. How many CCW victims do you know?

Quite a number actually. In domestic violence situations the abused could fight back and still end up in prison. A weapon should be the last resort not the first. There are cases in which police shoot the wrong person when acting hastily or just plain abuse their position and kill someone for their own agenda. There are corrupt cops, politicians, and many many others in every walk of life.

The 2nd Amendment is important but it should not be the main focus of dialog. Education about how to get along with people and civics should be a lot more important and maybe more instruction about the Golden Rule. I do not necessarily mean Christianity as many religions share the idea of doing onto others as you would have done undo you.