CDD 5 supervisors vote to end anonymous complaint system CDD 5 supervisors vote to end anonymous complaint system - Page 4 - Talk of The Villages Florida

CDD 5 supervisors vote to end anonymous complaint system

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #46  
Old 08-23-2020, 06:18 AM
Stu from NYC Stu from NYC is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 15,276
Thanks: 1,261
Thanked 16,253 Times in 6,368 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdFNJ View Post
And whether the alleged veteran was 80 or 90 had he not broken the rules "many years ago" (when he was 60, 70 or 80) he wouldn't have had any problems now. He should be thanked for his service but still have to follow all the rules we do. There is such a large number of vets here would that mean they should all be excluded from any violations?
The idea of people traveling our area looking for violations so they can turn in their neighbors makes my skin crawl.
  #47  
Old 08-23-2020, 06:28 AM
retiredguy123 retiredguy123 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 17,503
Thanks: 3,064
Thanked 16,665 Times in 6,594 Posts
Default

I would suggest that everyone print out a copy of their deed restrictions and read them.

Then, walk around the house and remove any items that violate the restrictions.
  #48  
Old 08-23-2020, 06:29 AM
Skunky1 Skunky1 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 354
Thanks: 41
Thanked 330 Times in 157 Posts
Default

A sign of your faith can go in the backyard I don’t need to see it. But then on the other hand if you really want to trash up the place let’s all put on our favorite little trinkets and treasures and statues in the front yard for all to see. How about Snow White and the seven dwarfs, goofy now there’s a good one how about a 6 foot statue of goofy. How about we all put statues and shrines to our faith in our front yard. We have Buddhism, Shintoism, atheism, and on and on and on. How about a swastika? That is a symbol of some peoples faith in this world! Your symbol is no more important than their symbol. Be careful what you wish for. The United States is a melting pot of all religions and Faith‘s .
  #49  
Old 08-23-2020, 06:31 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,783 Times in 2,004 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu from NYC View Post
The idea of people traveling our area looking for violations so they can turn in their neighbors makes my skin crawl.
I hope that all people realize that keeping our property to Community Standards makes The Villages nicely kept and beautiful. And reporting someone anonymously is a somewhat easier thing to do than telling them to their face, unless you have been raised to be outspoken.

If everyone were allowed to embellish and add and be creative and have their "individuality" shine, this place could be a mess in no time.

We came back to our new home in Hadley when we first lived here part time to find literally dozens of little "gookies and gee gaws and ceramic thingys " in the yard of a very near neighbor. I quickly phoned community standards and told them.

One of the reasons many of us chose the Villages is because of deed restrictions. I find that the anonymous reporting may be chicken to some but far easier for others. I don't see anything WRONG about someone seeing something in another neighborhood obviously not allowed and reporting it. That doesn't make my skin crawl at all.

Grace from Ohio.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.

Last edited by graciegirl; 08-23-2020 at 07:30 AM.
  #50  
Old 08-23-2020, 06:34 AM
arbajeda arbajeda is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Fenney
Posts: 165
Thanks: 49
Thanked 131 Times in 67 Posts
Default

The problem isn't with the complaints, it's with enforcement. As you may have noticed recently with all the riots going on, minor infractions aren't being prosecuted while major legal infractions are. Currently there is no means to evaluate the complaint to determine its effect on the neighborhood as a whole. Each district could establish a board of five or seven members (an odd number is important to avoid voting ties) to investigate the infraction. Those determined to be minor would be given a pass while more egregious infractions enforced. The name of the complainant would not have to be divulged.

Now if the complainant decided to press the issue beyond the district board to the ARC, their name would still be attached to the complaint and would become public knowledge.
  #51  
Old 08-23-2020, 06:34 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,783 Times in 2,004 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retiredguy123 View Post
I would suggest that everyone print out a copy of their deed restrictions and read them.

Then, walk around the house and remove any items that violate the restrictions.
Well said.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #52  
Old 08-23-2020, 06:42 AM
Mohawksin Mohawksin is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 125
Thanks: 415
Thanked 81 Times in 38 Posts
Default

The troll is the reporter. The accuser is the Standards Committee.
  #53  
Old 08-23-2020, 06:43 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,783 Times in 2,004 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arbajeda View Post
The problem isn't with the complaints, it's with enforcement. As you may have noticed recently with all the riots going on, minor infractions aren't being prosecuted while major legal infractions are. Currently there is no means to evaluate the complaint to determine its effect on the neighborhood as a whole. Each district could establish a board of five or seven members (an odd number is important to avoid voting ties) to investigate the infraction. Those determined to be minor would be given a pass while more egregious infractions enforced. The name of the complainant would not have to be divulged.

Now if the complainant decided to press the issue beyond the district board to the ARC, their name would still be attached to the complaint and would become public knowledge.
We already have a workable and fair way of enforcing. Plus some things are allowed with ARC approval. You need to ask. The Villages do not consider every complaint an infringement. Only those that are not approved by ARC.

If Deed Compliance determine that the complaint is valid, and all complaints are not valid, then there will be a notice given the homeowner and time for them to comply and then if that is ignored than a fine is given until the non compliance changes. If the fine is ignored there will be a lien placed on the property.

It works just fine that way.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #54  
Old 08-23-2020, 06:49 AM
ldovermiller ldovermiller is offline
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 76 Times in 28 Posts
Default

Here is a novel idea. We pay the Community Standards people to make sure the rules are enforced, why aren't they doing their
job to make sure the rules are followed. They drive around in their $50k white, 4x4 tucks all day ....what am I missing. DO YOUR JOB
or just get a person to answer the phone, run out and look for the violation. The complaint should only come from local residence!
  #55  
Old 08-23-2020, 06:53 AM
jbrown132 jbrown132 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 419
Thanks: 6
Thanked 688 Times in 262 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marathon Man View Post
Yes, yes. It's always someone HEARD about two women. There are about 10,000 people out there wanting to take a picture of them, but it has never happened. Can't take a picture of a myth.
I thing it may have been Bigfoot and the sister.
  #56  
Old 08-23-2020, 07:19 AM
OrangeBlossomBaby OrangeBlossomBaby is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 10,380
Thanks: 8,316
Thanked 11,533 Times in 3,883 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graciegirl View Post
I hope that all people realize that keeping our property to Community Standards makes The Villages nicely kept and beautiful. And reporting someone anonymously is a somewhat easier thing to do than telling them to their face, unless you have been raised to be outspoken.

If everyone were allowed to embellish and add and be creative and have their "individuality" shine, this place could be a mess in no time.

We came back to our new home in Hadley when we first lived here part time to find all literally dozens of little "gookies and gee gaws and ceramic thingys " in the yard of a very near neighbor. I quickly phoned community standards and told them.

One of the reasons many of us chose the Villages is because of deed restrictions. I find that the anonymous reporting may be chicken to some but far easier for others. I don't see anything about someone seeing something in another neighborhood obviously not allowed and reporting it. That doesn't make my skin crawl at all.

Grace from Ohio.
Their neighbor couldn't have been all that dear, if you weren't able to resolve it between yourself and them and had to resort to outside help.

I smell a fable. Or a not-so-dear neighbor. Maybe one of those "bless your heart" kinds of neighbors.
  #57  
Old 08-23-2020, 07:19 AM
Joe C. Joe C. is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The Villages, Fl.
Posts: 714
Thanks: 16
Thanked 808 Times in 380 Posts
Default

Mr. Ferlisi says that we all have a right to face our accuser. This is true. It's in the Constitution of the U.S. . However, legally, this is true ONLY in criminal cases...not civil cases.

That said, it is true that a deed violation is A DEED VIOLATION. If you want to talk about "entitlement", then you will be surprised at how many homeowners are entitled to decorate their lawns and "enhance" their property as they see fit.

So all I have to say is:

There goes the neighborhood.......
  #58  
Old 08-23-2020, 07:26 AM
ctmurray ctmurray is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 185
Thanks: 3
Thanked 132 Times in 63 Posts
Default Evidence of the "trolls"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu from NYC View Post
Seems like a needed change.

Friends from an older part of TV said they have heard of two women who ride around the better part of the day looking for houses they can report.
Yet no one has photo evidence. Might be a rumor?
  #59  
Old 08-23-2020, 07:29 AM
ctmurray ctmurray is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 185
Thanks: 3
Thanked 132 Times in 63 Posts
Default Not their job

Quote:
Originally Posted by ldovermiller View Post
Here is a novel idea. We pay the Community Standards people to make sure the rules are enforced, why aren't they doing their
job to make sure the rules are followed. They drive around in their $50k white, 4x4 tucks all day ....what am I missing. DO YOUR JOB
or just get a person to answer the phone, run out and look for the violation. The complaint should only come from local residence!
Actually, this is not their job. We would have to pay for much more as they would have to stop at many houses, write down the details, possibly put a note on their doors, submit the paperwork back at the office. The current method works, the complaints are legitimate.
  #60  
Old 08-23-2020, 07:35 AM
ctmurray ctmurray is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 185
Thanks: 3
Thanked 132 Times in 63 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arbajeda View Post
The problem isn't with the complaints, it's with enforcement. As you may have noticed recently with all the riots going on, minor infractions aren't being prosecuted while major legal infractions are. Currently there is no means to evaluate the complaint to determine its effect on the neighborhood as a whole. Each district could establish a board of five or seven members (an odd number is important to avoid voting ties) to investigate the infraction. Those determined to be minor would be given a pass while more egregious infractions enforced. The name of the complainant would not have to be divulged.

Now if the complainant decided to press the issue beyond the district board to the ARC, their name would still be attached to the complaint and would become public knowledge.
Florida Law makes every communication public. So no keeping a name secret for the first round of review you mentioned. This is why the anonymous system need to be around. Otherwise, forever, you could be targeted for rightly pointing out a violation.
Closed Thread

Tags
change, anonymous, don’t, system, board


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 AM.