[retiredguy123]

Originally Posted by alwann

Kids under 19 are not allowed to live here full-time. They can visit as often as you'd/they'd like but can't stay for more than 30 consecutive days. Whether this rule is actually enforced is a whole other can of worms.

To clarify, in my neighborhood, the deed restrictions state:

"... persons below the age of nineteen (19) may be permitted to visit and temporarily reside for periods not exceeding thirty (30) days in total in any calendar year."

Note that it doesn't say anything about consecutive days, but 30 days "in total".

[Shelbyh]

Originally Posted by tate1443

What is the restriction for children living in the Villages?

We bought a new home in TV 3 months ago. Our deed says no one under 19 can live in the home permanently.
This is not the problem here. If you watch ship smith news in TV who shares the police arrest info, adult children living with mom and dad are the trouble makers. I would agree with him.
Secondly, anyone of any age can be a renter here. Now this I don’t understand.

[retiredguy123]

Originally Posted by Shelbyh

We bought a new home in TV 3 months ago. Our deed says no one under 19 can live in the home permanently.
This is not the problem here. If you watch ship smith news in TV who shares the police arrest info, adult children living with mom and dad are the trouble makers. I would agree with him.
Secondly, anyone of any age can be a renter here. Now this I don’t understand.

Do you have a source for your last 2 sentences? As I understand it, the deed restrictions apply to the property owner, who must ensure compliance by any residents.

[ithos]

Has there ever been a case where a young adult was forced to move out of a home in The Villages?

[asianthree]

Originally Posted by ithos

Has there ever been a case where a young adult was forced to move out of a home in The Villages?

Around 2010 in our first neighborhood a retired couple had a horrific life changing event. Their daughter and spouse in a deadly crash, pronounced at the scene. Their 2yo child was not in the car.
Temporary custody was given to grandparents, here in TV. They immediately started looking for a home in the area, outside of TV. Someone filed a complaint, and notice was given to remove child, or vacant home. They took temporary residence outside of TV until home sold, and new residence established outside of TV.

Many neighbors were upset within days of funeral that someone in the neighborhood didn’t even give them a week before filing complaint. Neighborhood raised money to help with their sudden temporary move. We were out of state at the time, but our website gave everyone updates.

[ithos]

Originally Posted by asianthree

Around 2010 in our first neighborhood a retired couple had a horrific life changing event. Their daughter and spouse in a deadly crash, pronounced at the scene. Their 2yo child was not in the car.
Temporary custody was given to grandparents, here in TV. They immediately started looking for a home in the area, outside of TV. Someone filed a complaint, and notice was given to remove child, or vacant home. They took temporary residence outside of TV until home sold, and new residence established outside of TV.

Many neighbors were upset within days of funeral that someone in the neighborhood didn’t even give them a week before filing complaint. Neighborhood raised money to help with their sudden temporary move. We were out of state at the time, but our website gave everyone updates.

I knew that they enforced the rule for children. I was wondering if someone in their 20's or older was required to move out of a home for being too young?

[tophcfa]

Originally Posted by retiredguy123

The rule is pretty clear. HOPEFULLY, The Villages will enforce their own rule if they have a specific, verifiable complaint. I moved here to get away from living around children. Why can't people just follow the rules that they agreed to follow?

There in lies the key word, “HOPEFULLY”! Don’t hold your breath waiting for hopefully to happen. The precedent has already been set with not enforcing other internal deed restriction violations.

[CybrSage]

Originally Posted by retiredguy123

To clarify, in my neighborhood, the deed restrictions state:

"... persons below the age of nineteen (19) may be permitted to visit and temporarily reside for periods not exceeding thirty (30) days in total in any calendar year."

Note that it doesn't say anything about consecutive days, but 30 days "in total".

Mine says the same

[CybrSage]

Originally Posted by ithos

I knew that they enforced the rule for children. I was wondering if someone in their 20's or older was required to move out of a home for being too young?

My deed has no restrictions for people 19 and over. I could sell to a group of 19 year olds and it would be fully legal

[ithos]

Originally Posted by CybrSage

My deed has no restrictions for people 19 and over. I could sell to a group of 19 year olds and it would be fully legal

That is what I thought. So due to the twenty eighty rule, there probably never will be a case where an adult is thrown out.

[RRGuyNJ]

Originally Posted by retiredguy123

If they stay on my street for more than 30 days, I can guarantee that the rule will be enforced.

Yep, one of those.

[nn0wheremann]

Originally Posted by alwann

Kids under 19 are not allowed to live here full-time. They can visit as often as you'd/they'd like but can't stay for more than 30 consecutive days. Whether this rule is actually enforced is a whole other can of worms.

if no kids under 19 years old may live here why do we have to pay county school taxes?

[Bill14564]

Originally Posted by nn0wheremann

if no kids under 19 years old may live here why do we have to pay county school taxes?

Because "here" is part of the county.

[nn0wheremann]

Originally Posted by John Mayes

Wow.

Grumpy old guys goys rights too! Just ask Archie Bunker!

[retiredguy123]

Originally Posted by RRGuyNJ

Yep, one of those.

Maybe. I won't complain about lawn ornaments and most other things. But, I will complain about children moving in.