Good/Bad Idea- cut gov spending by % Good/Bad Idea- cut gov spending by % - Talk of The Villages Florida

Good/Bad Idea- cut gov spending by %

 
Thread Tools
 
Old 06-01-2025, 10:04 AM
jbartle1 jbartle1 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 272
Thanks: 30
Thanked 272 Times in 111 Posts
Default Good/Bad Idea- cut gov spending by %

Why reduce spending with different percentage by dept, need to reduce deficits by x dollars, cut SAME % for ALL DEPT to arrive at acceptable reduction. Surely I’m not the first to think of this, this alone would reduce need for budget dept, ha!
 
Old 06-01-2025, 10:15 AM
retiredguy123 retiredguy123 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 17,631
Thanks: 3,090
Thanked 16,777 Times in 6,646 Posts
Default

Some people think that, if you require a department to cut spending by 10 percent, they will cut the inefficient people and spending items. However, in most departments, they will do the exact opposite. They will eliminate the most efficient parts of the department, and then, when they are criticized for not performing, they will blame it on the mandated cuts and ask for more money. In Government, there is no profit or efficiency motive. The name of the game is to spend as much taxpayer money as you can get.
 
Old 06-01-2025, 10:16 AM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 7,513
Thanks: 2,347
Thanked 7,853 Times in 3,099 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbartle1 View Post
Why reduce spending with different percentage by dept, need to reduce deficits by x dollars, cut SAME % for ALL DEPT to arrive at acceptable reduction. Surely I’m not the first to think of this, this alone would reduce need for budget dept, ha!
Would you do this with your personal budget? If you needed to save money would you cut your grocery, water, and electricity spending by the same percentage as you might cut your cruise, airline, hotel, or restaurant spending? Or, would you determine what is essential (food, water, A/C) and what is not-so-essential (cruise, hotel, restaurant) and cut the non-essential items more?
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
 
Old 06-01-2025, 10:56 AM
vintageogauge vintageogauge is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: village of Fenney, Ford City, Pa., and Hudson, Ohio
Posts: 4,677
Thanks: 6
Thanked 4,905 Times in 1,684 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspinmo View Post
There no desire for elected officials to cut spending when all they do add their pet projects to bills. It should be mandatory for federal government to balance budget and pay down debt or they don’t get paid. IMO need go back to gold standard and stop federal reserve from just printing money like it Sunday news paper. And quit bailing out banks and GM.
Exactly how much gold do we have? Whatever it is it's worth a lot more than it was a couple years ago.
 
Old 06-01-2025, 11:05 AM
Caymus Caymus is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,292
Thanks: 22
Thanked 1,155 Times in 572 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintageogauge View Post
Exactly how much gold do we have? Whatever it is it's worth a lot more than it was a couple years ago.
China may have a lot more.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/news/...d=BingNewsSerp
 
Old 06-01-2025, 11:36 AM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 15,367
Thanks: 7,717
Thanked 6,337 Times in 3,284 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintageogauge View Post
Exactly how much gold do we have? Whatever it is it's worth a lot more than it was a couple years ago.
Nobody really knows
 
Old 06-01-2025, 12:43 PM
jimhoward jimhoward is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2024
Posts: 400
Thanks: 27
Thanked 372 Times in 183 Posts
Default

Here is a fun fact.....

If you fired all government employees, not just wasteful or redundant ones but all of them (not counting active military) eliminating every department you would save about 4.6% the federal budget.

If you then also fired all the active military, so there was no one at all left directly in government and no one protecting our country you would save an additional 3% for a total of 7.6%.

We would still be deficit spending. Its hard to cut spending when so much of it is things like interest on the debt.

The source for this is just internet google searches on the federal budget.
 
Old 06-01-2025, 01:05 PM
Pugchief's Avatar
Pugchief Pugchief is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 83
Thanked 1,426 Times in 561 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
Would you do this with your personal budget? If you needed to save money would you cut your grocery, water, and electricity spending by the same percentage as you might cut your cruise, airline, hotel, or restaurant spending? Or, would you determine what is essential (food, water, A/C) and what is not-so-essential (cruise, hotel, restaurant) and cut the non-essential items more?
This seems so logical, until you acknowledge that the public sector does not need to operate like either a business or person financially. If they did, they would have declared bankruptcy long ago. They can simply bail themselves out by printing money (federal) or increasing taxes (state, county, municipal). Until they can't. And that's when you have a HUGE problem.
 
Old 06-01-2025, 01:17 PM
tophcfa's Avatar
tophcfa tophcfa is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
Posts: 7,812
Thanks: 3,662
Thanked 11,339 Times in 3,620 Posts
Default

Works for me under three conditions. Don’t cut Medicare, don’t cut social security, and use 100% savings to reduce deficit/national debt.
 
Old 06-01-2025, 01:19 PM
Rainger99 Rainger99 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 2,856
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2,140 Times in 1,007 Posts
Default

Last year, the federal budget was $6.9 trillion

1. Mandatory Spending was $4.2 trillion or 61% of the total budget.
Of this, Social Security was $1.46 trillion or 21.2%
Medicare was $0.97 trillion or 14.1%
Medicaid was $0.60 trillion or 8.7%
Veterans’ Benefits was $0.32 trillion or 4.6%)
Other Mandatory spending was $0.85 trillion 12.3%

2. Discretionary Spending was $1.8 trillion or 26% of total budget
This was broken down by Defense which was $0.87 trillion 12.6% of total budget and 48% of discretionary
Non-Defense (e.g., education, transportation, housing) was $0.93 trillion or 13.5% of the budget and 52% of the discretionary

3. Net Interest on Debt was $0.88 trillion or 12.8% of total budget. I believe that this is the first time that interest has exceeded the defense budget.

In 2019, the federal budget was $4.45 trillion. That means that from 2019 to 2024, the federal government spending has increased by $2.45 trillion. That is about a 55% increase in just 5 years. If we just went back to 2019 spending, we could save a lot of money.
 
Old 06-01-2025, 01:24 PM
retiredguy123 retiredguy123 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 17,631
Thanks: 3,090
Thanked 16,777 Times in 6,646 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainger99 View Post
Last year, the federal budget was $6.9 trillion

1. Mandatory Spending was $4.2 trillion or 61% of the total budget.
Of this, Social Security was $1.46 trillion or 21.2%
Medicare was $0.97 trillion or 14.1%
Medicaid was $0.60 trillion or 8.7%
Veterans’ Benefits was $0.32 trillion or 4.6%)
Other Mandatory spending was $0.85 trillion 12.3%

2. Discretionary Spending was $1.8 trillion or 26% of total budget
This was broken down by Defense which was $0.87 trillion 12.6% of total budget and 48% of discretionary
Non-Defense (e.g., education, transportation, housing) was $0.93 trillion or 13.5% of the budget and 52% of the discretionary

3. Net Interest on Debt was $0.88 trillion or 12.8% of total budget. I believe that this is the first time that interest has exceeded the defense budget.

In 2019, the federal budget was $4.45 trillion. That means that from 2019 to 2024, the federal government spending has increased by $2.45 trillion. That is about a 55% increase in just 5 years. If we just went back to 2019 spending, we could save a lot of money.
Why is Medicaid considered mandatory spending?

I would also mention that fraudulant and wasteful spending in Social Security, Medicare, and Veterans benefits is also not mandatory.

Last edited by retiredguy123; 06-01-2025 at 01:35 PM.
 
Old 06-01-2025, 01:38 PM
Rainger99 Rainger99 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 2,856
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2,140 Times in 1,007 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retiredguy123 View Post
Why is Medicaid considered mandatory spending?
Federal law mandates that the government provide benefits to anyone meeting Medicaid eligibility criteria, creating a binding commitment.
 
Old 06-01-2025, 01:48 PM
retiredguy123 retiredguy123 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 17,631
Thanks: 3,090
Thanked 16,777 Times in 6,646 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainger99 View Post
Federal law mandates that the government provide benefits to anyone meeting Medicaid eligibility criteria, creating a binding commitment.
All Federal spending is prescribed by Federal law. Congress spends money all the time by passing Federal laws.
 
Old 06-01-2025, 01:52 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 7,513
Thanks: 2,347
Thanked 7,853 Times in 3,099 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retiredguy123 View Post
All Federal spending is prescribed by Federal law. Congress spends money all the time by passing Federal laws.
Some Federal laws *authorize* spending while other *mandate* spending.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
 
Old 06-02-2025, 04:46 AM
Cuervo Cuervo is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 340
Thanks: 0
Thanked 285 Times in 153 Posts
Default

Maybe we need to spend money to save money.
All I keep on hearing lately is AI, AI, AI, let's take it out for a spin and see if it can point out where we can cut unnecessary spending.
Attack this like we did with the Manhattan project to develop the atomic bomb.
Form a team of adults to supervise the task who have experienced life, not a gang of 20-year-olds, who school project is to cut spending without thinking about the consequences.
 

Tags
reduce, dept, cut, spending, good/bad
Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:37 PM.