I.R.S. Rules Against The Villages I.R.S. Rules Against The Villages - Page 26 - Talk of The Villages Florida

I.R.S. Rules Against The Villages

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #376  
Old 09-01-2013, 03:22 PM
Advogado Advogado is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 62
Thanked 685 Times in 229 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickey100 View Post
I would expect that IF there was a negative effect to the Villagers, for example, if the VCCDD had to pay penalties which affected its ability to provide our amenities, there would be a class action lawsuit against the developer. And of course, we don't know what the outcome of that would be.
You got that right, although I would be pretty sure the residents would ultimately prevail. But what happens in the meantime to the amenity system?
  #377  
Old 09-01-2013, 03:25 PM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,783 Times in 2,004 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Advogado View Post
Gracie is right when she indicates that nobody can tell you, with any certainty, what the outcome will be. You are also right-- some of the potential outcomes would not be "very good".

It is possible (although it seems unlikely) that the IRS will (a) change its position and say that developer-controlled CDDs can issue tax exempt bonds, or (b) only apply the proscription against such issuance prospectively (a real possibility). In either case, there would appear to be no impact on Villagers.

However, if the IRS successfully maintains its current position, there would presumably be huge costs incurred by the VCCDD, which owns a big chunk of the amenity facilities. If that happens, the concern to Villagers is how the amenity system would have the financial resources to continue to operate. But you should understand that, even if the VCCDD loses, the IRS cannot come after the Villagers for any taxes, penalties, etc.

Exactly how all this plays out, time will tell. For a more complete analysis, go to the POA website. You should also discount just about everything that the VHA and Daily Sun have said about the matter.


I strongly disagree.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #378  
Old 09-01-2013, 03:33 PM
rubicon rubicon is offline
Email Reported As Spam
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 13,694
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
Default

As residents follow this issue they need with support from the POA to discuss what options are available to them depending on the outcome.

It must begin with what the decision means for The Villages future

it must include who has liability/responsibility why the IRS ruled against The Villages, if they do

it must include research on related legal cases
  #379  
Old 09-01-2013, 04:00 PM
Advogado Advogado is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 62
Thanked 685 Times in 229 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graciegirl View Post
[/B][/COLOR]
I strongly disagree.
Then you have not been following this matter very closely.
  #380  
Old 09-01-2013, 04:03 PM
Easyrider Easyrider is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 228
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickey100 View Post
I would expect that IF there was a negative effect to the Villagers, for example, if the VCCDD had to pay penalties which affected its ability to provide our amenities, there would be a class action lawsuit against the developer. And of course, we don't know what the outcome of that would be.
I do know none of this IRS Bond Issue problem was disclosed to us as potential purchasers before we closed as required by Florida Real Estate Disclosure Laws and that in itself is a class action lawsuit if the outcome has a negative effect on the home buyers.
__________________
You have to stand for something, or you will fall for anything.
  #381  
Old 09-01-2013, 04:23 PM
Bogie Shooter Bogie Shooter is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 19,750
Thanks: 13
Thanked 6,119 Times in 2,718 Posts
Default

Hundreds and hundreds of opinions. Nobody really knows.

IRS investigation
Developer IRS issues.
IRS/Bond Issue
Can I get a straight answer on IRS?
IRS Investigation - tax-free bonds
Daily Sun article: District updates position on IRS
Latest Development in the IRS Tax-Exempt-Bond Investigation
IRS resets bond challenge.
__________________
The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell.
“Only truth and transparency can guarantee freedom”, John McCain
  #382  
Old 09-01-2013, 04:50 PM
dillywho dillywho is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Summerhill
Posts: 1,765
Thanks: 133
Thanked 78 Times in 27 Posts
Default My Thoughts

Has it occurred to anyone here that IF the IRS prevails that it may just all fall on the developer alone? Then what will the nay-sayers have to say about the developer?

Who took the risk to develop this place? Certainly none of us. How could the developers possibly have known for sure that if they built all this that it would be a sure-shot? As I see it, we really don't have anything to lose.

I remember when they had their troubles in Montana how people here were so worried about what ramifications we would all suffer if they lost in court. They lost and that was the end of that; no impact here other than criticisms of how they got into trouble in the first place and what scoundrels they are.

I don't know them, but I do appreciate their ability to do business. They have done many things here that they didn't have to do. The land for the VA Clinic comes to mind, for one. I'm sure it generates business for them in various ways but not having to constantly travel to Leesburg or Gainesville is a big plus for lots of folks here.

Let's worry about the issues facing each of us everyday and not so much about something over which we have no control. It still beats the heck out of any place else we've lived since retirement or considered. Comparison shopping is always an option.
__________________
Lubbock, TX
Bamberg, Germany
Lawton, OK
Amarillo, TX
The Villages, FL

To quote my dad:
"I never did see a board that didn't have two sides."
  #383  
Old 09-01-2013, 05:18 PM
mickey100 mickey100 is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,022
Thanks: 331
Thanked 333 Times in 107 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dillywho View Post
...
Let's worry about the issues facing each of us everyday and not so much about something over which we have no control. It still beats the heck out of any place else we've lived since retirement or considered. Comparison shopping is always an option.
At present it beats the heck out of any other retirement option we considered. However, if something happens to negatively affect the amenity fund flow, we'll all be singing a different tune. As Advogado said, hopefully the residents would prevail in a class action lawsuit, but that could take years, and in the meantime our property values would most likely take a hit. I'm certainly hoping things go our way, but realistically, I don't see any guarantees.
  #384  
Old 09-01-2013, 05:50 PM
Mikeod's Avatar
Mikeod Mikeod is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Caroline
Posts: 5,021
Thanks: 0
Thanked 50 Times in 28 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dillywho View Post
Has it occurred to anyone here that IF the IRS prevails that it may just all fall on the developer alone? Then what will the nay-sayers have to say about the developer?
.
The dispute is between the central districts and the IRS. The developer is involved only because he is the principal landowner in the central districts and thus controls the makeup of the boards. But our amenity fees go to the central districts and the quality of our amenities may be at risk if the IRS prevails.

Now, there are those who believe the developer will not let our amenities suffer and will step in to cover penalties and interest if they are imposed. But he has no legal obligation to do that. With the profits earned from the sale of the amenities, which was maximized because of the tax-free bonds, there may be a moral obligation to keep us whole since we did not benefit in any significant way from the bond issue.

But, as stated many times before, nobody knows what the outcome will be.
  #385  
Old 09-01-2013, 06:19 PM
Bogie Shooter Bogie Shooter is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 19,750
Thanks: 13
Thanked 6,119 Times in 2,718 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickey100 View Post
At present it beats the heck out of any other retirement option we considered. However, if something happens to negatively affect the amenity fund flow, we'll all be singing a different tune. As Advogado said, hopefully the residents would prevail in a class action lawsuit, but that could take years, and in the meantime our property values would most likely take a hit. I'm certainly hoping things go our way, but realistically, I don't see any guarantees.
So much certainty...........................
__________________
The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell.
“Only truth and transparency can guarantee freedom”, John McCain
  #386  
Old 09-01-2013, 07:45 PM
Easyrider Easyrider is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 228
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Summerhill
Posts: 899
Default My Thoughts
Has it occurred to anyone here that IF the IRS prevails that it may just all fall on the developer alone? Then what will the nay-sayers have to say about the developer?

Who took the risk to develop this place? Certainly none of us. How could the developers possibly have known for sure that if they built all this that it would be a sure-shot? As I see it, we really don't have anything to lose.





Of course you realize it started very small and was added to as the original venture paid off and then more was added as more and more money was made . It's not like the whole thing was built at once hoping for a winner and millions were put at risk on less than a sure thing up front.
__________________
You have to stand for something, or you will fall for anything.
  #387  
Old 09-01-2013, 07:47 PM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,783 Times in 2,004 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dillywho View Post
Has it occurred to anyone here that IF the IRS prevails that it may just all fall on the developer alone? Then what will the nay-sayers have to say about the developer?

Who took the risk to develop this place? Certainly none of us. How could the developers possibly have known for sure that if they built all this that it would be a sure-shot? As I see it, we really don't have anything to lose.

I remember when they had their troubles in Montana how people here were so worried about what ramifications we would all suffer if they lost in court. They lost and that was the end of that; no impact here other than criticisms of how they got into trouble in the first place and what scoundrels they are.

I don't know them, but I do appreciate their ability to do business. They have done many things here that they didn't have to do. The land for the VA Clinic comes to mind, for one. I'm sure it generates business for them in various ways but not having to constantly travel to Leesburg or Gainesville is a big plus for lots of folks here.

Let's worry about the issues facing each of us everyday and not so much about something over which we have no control. It still beats the heck out of any place else we've lived since retirement or considered. Comparison shopping is always an option.
Well said. And although it wasn't the size it is now, the money put to risk was most everything they had.

Thank you Morse family for all of us who appreciate it and for those who don't.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #388  
Old 09-02-2013, 06:50 AM
JP's Avatar
JP JP is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The Village of St. James and Marquette, Michigan
Posts: 923
Thanks: 7
Thanked 282 Times in 125 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graciegirl View Post
Well said. And although it wasn't the size it is now, the money put to risk was most everything they had.

Thank you Morse family for all of us who appreciate it and for those who don't.
I agree and it just goes to show you what can be done when there is money available that isn't taxed like crazy.

There could be more places like TV all across America if the government would just get out of our pockets and more people would accept individual responsibility.
__________________
"I am a great believer in luck, and I find that the harder I work, the more I have of it." -Thomas Jefferson
  #389  
Old 09-02-2013, 06:58 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,783 Times in 2,004 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP View Post
I agree and it just goes to show you what can be done when there is money available that isn't taxed like crazy.

There could be more places like TV all across America if the government would just get out of our pockets and more people would accept individual responsibility.

I want to hug you.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #390  
Old 09-02-2013, 09:09 AM
marlinguy marlinguy is offline
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Now I understand ( a little!)

Thanks for the direction to the POA website. Never even knew there was one. Now I understand why "no one knows"?? Geez, thinking about a hefty bond on a golf course home, enjoying life and all "the stuff" and potentially have a major "glitch",,,and never having been able to enjoy "the stuff". Boy, something to think about
Closed Thread


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM.