Increases coming to CDD?

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #61  
Old 03-19-2024, 06:43 PM
rustyp rustyp is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,204
Thanks: 5,238
Thanked 2,571 Times in 920 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
Let's see:
- What rule was not enforced?
- The Developer has no responsibility to enforce any rule (check your deed restrictions)
- There *may* be additional legal fees
- Additional fees will NOT come out of amenity funds
-The CDD is *asking* for this additional authority
- What negligence?
- People under 18 living in TV/ Running business from home
- Developer has no responsibility = selective enforcement - why not ignore my landscape violation 10 feet from the curb ?
- There will be legal fees
- The CDD and new residents are overreacting to the fear of short term rentals
- Negligence ? Look squirrel !
  #62  
Old 03-19-2024, 06:57 PM
BrianL99 BrianL99 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 3,293
Thanks: 296
Thanked 3,281 Times in 1,267 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rustyp View Post
- People under 18 living in TV/ Running business from home
- Developer has no responsibility = selective enforcement - why not ignore my landscape violation 10 feet from the curb ?
- There will be legal fees
- The CDD and new residents are overreacting to the fear of short term rentals
- Negligence ? Look squirrel !
According the Newspaper (the name of which is not to be mentioned) article quoted in the original post, the CDD's did not "ask for this authority".

Apparently the Developer, on his own motion, met with legal counsel for CDD #4. The Supervisors were unaware of the meeting, until informed about it last week.

According to the Supervisors, such an undertaking would result in higher fees to residents, to pay for the legal costs incurred.
  #63  
Old 03-19-2024, 07:00 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is online now
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 7,025
Thanks: 2,172
Thanked 7,483 Times in 2,896 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rustyp View Post
- People under 18 living in TV/ Running business from home
- Developer has no responsibility = selective enforcement - why not ignore my landscape violation 10 feet from the curb ?
- There will be legal fees
- The CDD and new residents are overreacting to the fear of short term rentals
- Negligence ? Look squirrel !
1. If that is happening then it should be fixed but, os it actually happening or is it just a rumor?
2. There has been no selective enforcement described here. All complaints to the CDD are followed up. Complaints to the Developer would likely not be made public so there is no way to know if they were dealt with.
3. If your crystal ball is that good, would you share the winning lottery numbers with us?
4. The CDD may be overreacting to something but STRs do not violate deed restrictions and in any case, the CDD is asking for authority, they are not being forces to take it.
5. Again, what negligence are you referring to?
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
  #64  
Old 03-19-2024, 07:21 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is online now
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 7,025
Thanks: 2,172
Thanked 7,483 Times in 2,896 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
According the Newspaper (the name of which is not to be mentioned) article quoted in the original post, the CDD's did not "ask for this authority".

Apparently the Developer, on his own motion, met with legal counsel for CDD #4. The Supervisors were unaware of the meeting, until informed about it last week.

According to the Supervisors, such an undertaking would result in higher fees to residents, to pay for the legal costs incurred.
Looks like I need to do some digging. The article was not the first time I heard about this and I thought it involved a different CDD. When I find those details and source information I will post it.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
  #65  
Old 03-19-2024, 09:39 PM
tophcfa's Avatar
tophcfa tophcfa is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
Posts: 7,506
Thanks: 3,523
Thanked 10,941 Times in 3,480 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimjamuser View Post
Personally, I have trouble seeing WHY anyone would want to relocate to Florida, especially for full-time living. The summers are disgustingly HOT, moldy and unhealthy, in general. And G.W. is making every succeeding summer incrementally WORSE. The warmer air is holding more RAIN. Hurricanes are predicted to intensify. The property costs are sky-HIGH. The interest rates are HIGH. The insurance costs are 3 TIMES the national average. Sixty vehicles are backed up on 441 at every red light. The local hospitals are considered MARGINAL.
.......On top of all that, you have underage and overage children walking the residential streets that look as if they would be kicked out of any street gang because none would have them. One "child" walks the streets playing a guitar while staring THREATENINGLY at the passing cars. I am sure that they need psychological help. I am just NOT sure that the streets of The Villages are the best place for them to get help. If there is this "change of responsibility" that would enforce a one month rule for visiting grandchildren, then I would be all for it. There are NEWER problem areas for The Villages developing in the last 2 years involving children (unwanted children).
Yet you are presumably here and the Villages continues to sell homes as fast as they can build them. Go figure?
  #66  
Old 03-20-2024, 06:03 AM
rustyp rustyp is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,204
Thanks: 5,238
Thanked 2,571 Times in 920 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
Looks like I need to do some digging. The article was not the first time I heard about this and I thought it involved a different CDD. When I find those details and source information I will post it.
-
  #67  
Old 03-20-2024, 06:40 AM
coleprice coleprice is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 208
Thanks: 624
Thanked 159 Times in 79 Posts
Default Where Will the Additional Money Come From?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skippy05 View Post
Developer ready to hand off enforcement of rules against children and businesses. CDDs will need more money for legal fees to accomplish.....per The Village News.
Basic Rule of Business: The CDD's should NOT accept the responsibility to enforce rules against children and businesses if there is additional cost to them UNLESS the developer also provides the funds estimated to execute the associated effort. To do otherwise would be irresponsible, as it would be like a Contractor accepting a Change (New Work) without an associated increase in Cost.
  #68  
Old 03-20-2024, 06:41 AM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is online now
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 7,025
Thanks: 2,172
Thanked 7,483 Times in 2,896 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
According the Newspaper (the name of which is not to be mentioned) article quoted in the original post, the CDD's did not "ask for this authority".

Apparently the Developer, on his own motion, met with legal counsel for CDD #4. The Supervisors were unaware of the meeting, until informed about it last week.

According to the Supervisors, such an undertaking would result in higher fees to residents, to pay for the legal costs incurred.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
Looks like I need to do some digging. The article was not the first time I heard about this and I thought it involved a different CDD. When I find those details and source information I will post it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rustyp View Post
-
In the March 8 minutes of the CDD4 board meeting at the 1:10:12 mark, there is a discussion of CDD4 assisting in the enforcement of internal deed restrictions. This was a follow-up on a request CDD4 made to the Developer. CD4 does not want to take over enforcement but wants to assist, particularly with complaints about children and businesses. There is a possibility that Florida Statute 190 may need to be amended to allow this. A meeting was set up for the following week (possibly 3/17?) with the Developer's attorney for further discussions.

CDD4 initiated the request. The meeting that was reported on was the follow-up meeting. CDD4 was not surprised and the Developer did not initiate.

I still believe I heard the same topic mentioned with another CDD but I doubt I will search the minutes to find it.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
  #69  
Old 03-20-2024, 07:15 AM
Marathon Man Marathon Man is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,820
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3,098 Times in 1,105 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimjamuser View Post
Personally, I have trouble seeing WHY anyone would want to relocate to Florida, especially for full-time living. The summers are disgustingly HOT, moldy and unhealthy, in general. And G.W. is making every succeeding summer incrementally WORSE. The warmer air is holding more RAIN. Hurricanes are predicted to intensify. The property costs are sky-HIGH. The interest rates are HIGH. The insurance costs are 3 TIMES the national average. Sixty vehicles are backed up on 441 at every red light. The local hospitals are considered MARGINAL.
.......On top of all that, you have underage and overage children walking the residential streets that look as if they would be kicked out of any street gang because none would have them. One "child" walks the streets playing a guitar while staring THREATENINGLY at the passing cars. I am sure that they need psychological help. I am just NOT sure that the streets of The Villages are the best place for them to get help. If there is this "change of responsibility" that would enforce a one month rule for visiting grandchildren, then I would be all for it. There are NEWER problem areas for The Villages developing in the last 2 years involving children (unwanted children).
Wow. Just, wow.
  #70  
Old 03-20-2024, 08:46 AM
nn0wheremann nn0wheremann is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 859
Thanks: 88
Thanked 333 Times in 238 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skippy05 View Post
Developer ready to hand off enforcement of rules against children and businesses. CDDs will need more money for legal fees to accomplish.....per The Village News.
They could hire Guido Two Fingers and the Joyzy Guyz who would do the enforcement cheap, or place a lien on the offending property and collect when the offenders sell.
  #71  
Old 03-20-2024, 12:29 PM
Justputt Justputt is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 248
Thanks: 103
Thanked 149 Times in 96 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marathon Man View Post
Wow. Just, wow.
Indeed! I want to type LOL, but they may be serious....
  #72  
Old 03-20-2024, 01:25 PM
4$ALE 4$ALE is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 195
Thanks: 2
Thanked 189 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justputt View Post
Indeed! I want to type LOL, but they may be serious....
May?????
  #73  
Old 03-20-2024, 04:31 PM
Veiragirl Veiragirl is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 206
Thanks: 1
Thanked 150 Times in 75 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tophcfa View Post
I’m for whatever it takes if the CDD’s are willing to enforce two specific deed restrictions, properties shall be used as single family residential units and businesses cannot be run out of residential homes. That would take care of the problem of people renting out rooms to non family members while concurrently living in the home.
I totally agree. My biggest problem is teenagers/moocher kids who play video games and dont work. They also are a problem with crime here in TV. I hope someone in TV will report this behavior (seeing these people living where they shouldn't be)

They're parents should stop enabling them. They need a swift kick in ass .
  #74  
Old 03-20-2024, 04:59 PM
kcrazorbackfan's Avatar
kcrazorbackfan kcrazorbackfan is offline
Sage
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: The Villages, FL
Posts: 3,632
Thanks: 250
Thanked 1,687 Times in 573 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skippy05 View Post
Developer ready to hand off enforcement of rules against children and businesses. CDDs will need more money for legal fees to accomplish.....per The Village News.
Every thing comes at a price; do the complainers want children and businesses in their neighborhoods or not; if they don’t, get ready to scratch a check out for more money to the CDD’s.
__________________
If you see something that’s not right, say something.
  #75  
Old 03-20-2024, 05:51 PM
jimjamuser jimjamuser is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 9,806
Thanks: 6,789
Thanked 2,227 Times in 1,796 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
Has that message been vetted by the Florida Department of Travel and Tourism?
Have you heard - they want to make ME their spokesperson.
Closed Thread

Tags
increases, cdds, village, accomplish, fees


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 PM.