Indoor Pool coming

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #136  
Old 09-06-2016, 12:33 PM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 14,698
Thanks: 7,392
Thanked 5,995 Times in 3,087 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graciegirl View Post
Can you substantiate this at all?
Yes, by reading between the lines and who's bread in butter!
  #137  
Old 09-06-2016, 12:56 PM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,195
Thanks: 5,029
Thanked 5,793 Times in 2,006 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspinmo View Post
She and Rotan probably pushing it on the developers land over by Rio Grande pool so the developers can get some of they're law suit money back. They keep pushing this parcel over the 40 acres in the north (not the NE) that lacks amenities which the law suit was over IMO. Course I sure all that live south el Camino Reno have different opinions?
It's Rohan. Not sure just what you are trying to say. I can tell you this..

I am NOT a fan of the POA.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #138  
Old 09-06-2016, 01:29 PM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 14,698
Thanks: 7,392
Thanked 5,995 Times in 3,087 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graciegirl View Post
It's Rohan. Not sure just what you are trying to say. I can tell you this..

I am NOT a fan of the POA.
Some of use don't have choice above the mason Dixon line.

I guess you don't get the POA news and read the minutes of the meetings. It don't effect you all south of the mason Dixon line yet due to the developer still in charge and owns amenities what I understand? Correct me it I'm wrong?

Basically Ms. Tutt pushing developers property and I think she enlisted MR. ROHAN ( the developer's main man?) which it seems most POA members aren't that interested in that area in district 3 and 4) for the final push. Even though the 8 acres mol around 100k vs 3 mil for 40 acres. Which would be good for district 1 and 2, but does nothing for 3 and 4 IMO.

Rio grande NE of 466. IMO that area has ample ammenties or less lacking than far north. North 466 above Glenview (el Camino Reno). with the expansion of District 4 are and was lacking Amenities IMO and others the live in the far north.
  #139  
Old 09-07-2016, 06:59 AM
mickey100 mickey100 is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,025
Thanks: 331
Thanked 333 Times in 107 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outlaw View Post
The priority memberships still require a substantial user fee each time the facility is used; as much as $8 per person for tennis, $30-$40 for golf?; pools are free, but are open to families. I wonder how many people would be willing to pay $5-$8 each time plus a monthly fee to use an indoor swimming pool. I'm guessing very few.
The going rate is more like $5 - $10 with no monthly fee. At least that is what we pay as a daily rate at health clubs and ymca's when we are on the road. And that gives access to a lot more than just a swimming pool.

i don't think we have to worry about The Villages undercharging.
  #140  
Old 09-07-2016, 07:42 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,195
Thanks: 5,029
Thanked 5,793 Times in 2,006 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickey100 View Post
The going rate is more like $5 - $10 with no monthly fee. At least that is what we pay as a daily rate at health clubs and ymca's when we are on the road. And that gives access to a lot more than just a swimming pool.

i don't think we have to worry about The Villages undercharging.


And I think the prices are way fair.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #141  
Old 09-07-2016, 07:49 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,195
Thanks: 5,029
Thanked 5,793 Times in 2,006 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspinmo View Post
Some of use don't have choice above the mason Dixon line.

I guess you don't get the POA news and read the minutes of the meetings. It don't effect you all south of the mason Dixon line yet due to the developer still in charge and owns amenities what I understand? Correct me it I'm wrong?

Basically Ms. Tutt pushing developers property and I think she enlisted MR. ROHAN ( the developer's main man?) which it seems most POA members aren't that interested in that area in district 3 and 4) for the final push. Even though the 8 acres mol around 100k vs 3 mil for 40 acres. Which would be good for district 1 and 2, but does nothing for 3 and 4 IMO.

Rio grande NE of 466. IMO that area has ample ammenties or less lacking than far north. North 466 above Glenview (el Camino Reno). with the expansion of District 4 are and was lacking Amenities IMO and others the live in the far north.

John Rohan has been the Director of Recreation for many years and has a great new Rec center built in his honor.


More about him;
John B. Rohan, Director of Recreation
352-674-1800
John.Rohan@Districtgov.org

John B. Rohan has worked for The Villages Community Development District since 1993. John’s leadership extends to several areas within the recreation department that include Executive Golf, Fitness Clubs, Special Events and Room Reservations. These facilities are managed with a budget of $20 million per year and over 500 full and part time employees.

He has witnessed and experienced firsthand the positive impact recreation has had on the residents of our community. Through his experience in recreation management, recreational programming, and special event management, John encourages resident’s involvement in creating a healthy and active lifestyle in the community.

John received his Bachelor’s degree in Recreation from the University of Florida in 1993 and his Master’s Degree in Public Administration from Troy State University in 2002. He is an active supporter and member of the Florida Recreation & Park Association and the National Recreation & Park Association.

John serves on the Children’s Advocacy Center Board, Operation Homebound, St. Timothy’s Pastoral council, Knights of Columbus and highly involved in The Villages Charter School. He and his wife, Krissy Rohan, Director of the Little Buffalo Learning Center enjoy the outdoors and spending time with their children, John Michael and Chelsea who are both attending college in Gainesville, FL.


Click here to view the Recreation Department’s Purpose, Vision, Mission and Core Values
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.

Last edited by graciegirl; 09-07-2016 at 08:05 AM.
  #142  
Old 09-07-2016, 08:03 AM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 14,698
Thanks: 7,392
Thanked 5,995 Times in 3,087 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graciegirl View Post
John Rohan has been the Director of Recreation for many years and has this great new Rec center built in his honor.

I rest my case?
  #143  
Old 09-07-2016, 07:29 PM
Carl in Tampa's Avatar
Carl in Tampa Carl in Tampa is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Split time between Tampa and The Villages
Posts: 1,891
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Smile Opinions, opinions......

Let's see..... In a community of over 100,000 people, a new proposal is announced and there are a multitude of opinions on both sides of the issue.

And there are even some opinions that (gasp) the Developer is proposing something solely so that the Developer can make a profit.

---------------------------------------

I have visited several retirement communities in Florida and California, and have never seen one that approaches the value (for cost to the resident) of The Villages. I'm sure the Developer faced similar resistance to other proposals that were put forward in the past.

To me, one of their big missteps was to build the Brownwood Town Square so far south. It should have been more centrally located between 466A and 44, and centrally between Buena Vista and Morse. But, there are probably 50,000 contrary opinions about this.
__________________
  #144  
Old 09-07-2016, 08:58 PM
goodtimesintv goodtimesintv is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 535
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I think the developers know more about how to fund and build a facility like this than everyone here combined.

If some here know so much, why haven't they done it already....starting with mortgaging everything you own, including retirement funds.

  #145  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:42 AM
2BNTV's Avatar
2BNTV 2BNTV is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,711
Thanks: 1
Thanked 134 Times in 61 Posts
Default

I believe the "indoor pool" request has been on the annual survey for several years. Now the developer has decided an indoor pool would be beneficial for some residents. Some people have requested a shaded/indoor pool as they have skin cancer or swimming, is their major form of exercise. There has been a variety of opinions, pro and con. I would tend to think, more than one indoor pool may have to be built as the demand may be overwhelming. As usual, something gets panned, before it even opens it's doors. You can't make everyone happy, seems to apply.

I shutter at the thought if the Morse family ever relinquishes control of the paradise they built. Having it run by the residents who only want to pay a pro rated fee for the amenities they only use, is folly. For what is available, it's truly amazing and inexpensive. IMHO

I don't use all of the amenities but I don't begrudge anyone who does. I am not a pool person so I don't have a dog in this fight. I take comfort in the Morse family saying their grandchildren will take over the running of TV, so my concern level is zero.

I lived in a condo in CT before moving to TV and the condo board did a lousy job. TV system seems to run like clockwork. IMHO If the inmates ever start running the asylum, I may have to rethink my viewpoint!
__________________
"It doesn't cost "nuttin", to be nice". MOM

I just want to do the right thing! Uncle Joe, (my hero).
  #146  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:44 AM
Allegiance Allegiance is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 7,098
Thanks: 0
Thanked 162 Times in 161 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2BNTV View Post
I believe the "indoor pool" request has been on the annual survey for several years. Now the developer has decided an indoor pool would be beneficial for some residents. Some people have requested a shaded/indoor pool as they have skin cancer or swimming, is their major form of exercise. There has been a variety of opinions, pro and con. I would tend to think, more than one indoor pool may have to be built as the demand may be overwhelming. As usual, something gets panned, before it even opens it's doors. You can't make everyone happy, seems to apply.

I shutter at the thought if the Morse family ever relinquishes control of the paradise they built. Having it run by the residents who only want to pay a pro rated fee for the amenities they only use, is folly. For what is available, it's truly amazing and inexpensive. IMHO

I don't use all of the amenities but I don't begrudge anyone who does. I am not a pool person so I don't have a dog in this fight. I take comfort in the Morse family saying their grandchildren will take over the running of TV, so my concern level is zero.

I lived in a condo in CT before moving to TV and the condo board did a lousy job. TV system seems to run like clockwork. IMHO If the inmates ever start running the asylum, I may have to rethink my viewpoint!
[emoji106] [emoji106] [emoji106]
  #147  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:50 AM
Bonny's Avatar
Bonny Bonny is offline
Eternal Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Village of BonnyBrook
Posts: 4,322
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2BNTV View Post
I believe the "indoor pool" request has been on the annual survey for several years. Now the developer has decided an indoor pool would be beneficial for some residents. Some people have requested a shaded/indoor pool as they have skin cancer or swimming, is their major form of exercise. There has been a variety of opinions, pro and con. I would tend to think, more than one indoor pool may have to be built as the demand may be overwhelming. As usual, something gets panned, before it even opens it's doors. You can't make everyone happy, seems to apply.

I shutter at the thought if the Morse family ever relinquishes control of the paradise they built. Having it run by the residents who only want to pay a pro rated fee for the amenities they only use, is folly. For what is available, it's truly amazing and inexpensive. IMHO

I don't use all of the amenities but I don't begrudge anyone who does. I am not a pool person so I don't have a dog in this fight. I take comfort in the Morse family saying their grandchildren will take over the running of TV, so my concern level is zero.

I lived in a condo in CT before moving to TV and the condo board did a lousy job. TV system seems to run like clockwork. IMHO If the inmates ever start running the asylum, I may have to rethink my viewpoint!
Well said !! I agree!!
__________________
Troy, Rochester, Hazel Park, Harbor Beach, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  #148  
Old 09-08-2016, 11:10 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,195
Thanks: 5,029
Thanked 5,793 Times in 2,006 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2BNTV View Post
I believe the "indoor pool" request has been on the annual survey for several years. Now the developer has decided an indoor pool would be beneficial for some residents. Some people have requested a shaded/indoor pool as they have skin cancer or swimming, is their major form of exercise. There has been a variety of opinions, pro and con. I would tend to think, more than one indoor pool may have to be built as the demand may be overwhelming. As usual, something gets panned, before it even opens it's doors. You can't make everyone happy, seems to apply.

I shutter at the thought if the Morse family ever relinquishes control of the paradise they built. Having it run by the residents who only want to pay a pro rated fee for the amenities they only use, is folly. For what is available, it's truly amazing and inexpensive. IMHO

I don't use all of the amenities but I don't begrudge anyone who does. I am not a pool person so I don't have a dog in this fight. I take comfort in the Morse family saying their grandchildren will take over the running of TV, so my concern level is zero.

I lived in a condo in CT before moving to TV and the condo board did a lousy job. TV system seems to run like clockwork. IMHO If the inmates ever start running the asylum, I may have to rethink my viewpoint!
Excellent post!
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #149  
Old 09-08-2016, 12:23 PM
Bonny's Avatar
Bonny Bonny is offline
Eternal Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Village of BonnyBrook
Posts: 4,322
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Just kind of chuckling to myself, looking at 15 pages talking about something we don't even have, don't know when we will have it or where it will be or how using it will work or how it will work out payment wise.
Enjoying reading it.
__________________
Troy, Rochester, Hazel Park, Harbor Beach, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  #150  
Old 09-08-2016, 12:27 PM
Villageswimmer Villageswimmer is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,920
Thanks: 2
Thanked 749 Times in 259 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2BNTV View Post
I believe the "indoor pool" request has been on the annual survey for several years. Now the developer has decided an indoor pool would be beneficial for some residents. Some people have requested a shaded/indoor pool as they have skin cancer or swimming, is their major form of exercise. There has been a variety of opinions, pro and con. I would tend to think, more than one indoor pool may have to be built as the demand may be overwhelming. As usual, something gets panned, before it even opens it's doors. You can't make everyone happy, seems to apply.

I shutter at the thought if the Morse family ever relinquishes control of the paradise they built. Having it run by the residents who only want to pay a pro rated fee for the amenities they only use, is folly. For what is available, it's truly amazing and inexpensive. IMHO

I don't use all of the amenities but I don't begrudge anyone who does. I am not a pool person so I don't have a dog in this fight. I take comfort in the Morse family saying their grandchildren will take over the running of TV, so my concern level is zero.

I lived in a condo in CT before moving to TV and the condo board did a lousy job. TV system seems to run like clockwork. IMHO If the inmates ever start running the asylum, I may have to rethink my viewpoint!

Amen! especially your second paragraph.
Closed Thread

Tags
pool, indoor, tutt, additional, details


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 PM.