[coffeebean]

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby

The above is a quote tree.

It's posting a quote, that someone responded to, and quoting that response "in line." It's also known as nested quotes.

I'd show you the actual syntax, but the administration of this forum has disabled the [code] option.

I've not seen this before on this or any other forum I visit. Thanks.

[coffeebean]

Originally Posted by Aces4

Really, vaccinated are not contagious as long as the unvaccinated? When was that determination established seeing that anyone anytime can be reintroduced to covid 19 and carry it unwittingly in their noses and mouths to other people.

That is correct........

COVID transmission among vaccinated, unvaccinated. What experts say.

COVID-19 breakthrough cases: How contagious are you? | wusa9.com

[coffeebean]

Originally Posted by Aces4

Actually, read post 149 where Golfing Eagles questioned your usage of a quote.

I went back several pages to see where the QUOTE function got messed up (including post #149 by GE) and the messed up quoting snowballed for several postings.

It was jswirs in post #120 who messed up the whole process of the quote function on this thread. After that "mess up", the subsequent quoting by several posters continued to be totally messed up.

If you go back and check, post #159 got us back on track and there was no further "messed up" quotes. What I did was delete the second user name when I replied. I guess that is considered "nesting" but I'm not sure. I just remember having to remove one person's' user name who had not made that comment that I quoted.

Is that as clear as mud???? Anyway.....we are back on track with the quote function. Carry on.

[Aces4]

Originally Posted by coffeebean

That is correct........

COVID transmission among vaccinated, unvaccinated. What experts say.

COVID-19 breakthrough cases: How contagious are you? | wusa9.com

I’m beginning to see why so many people don’t trust anything being put out by the experts anymore. I personally know of too many transmissions of this virus between vaccinated to know those statistics appear to be wonky. Is anyone tracking this information at all if the ill aren’t hospitalized?

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by Aces4

I’m beginning to see why so many people don’t trust anything being put out by the experts anymore. I personally know of too many transmissions of this virus between vaccinated to know those statistics appear to be wonky. Is anyone tracking this information at all if the ill aren’t hospitalized?

Let's examine that statement scientifically. You personally know........just how many----3,5,7 even 12? And you also KNOW it was vaccinated to vaccinated transmission? Even if that is true, there are hundreds of millions of persons vaccinated, so guess what statistically your personal sampling of a few means--------ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

[coffeebean]

Originally Posted by Aces4

I’m beginning to see why so many people don’t trust anything being put out by the experts anymore. I personally know of too many transmissions of this virus between vaccinated to know those statistics appear to be wonky. Is anyone tracking this information at all if the ill aren’t hospitalized?

Do you mean, ".......if the VACCINATED aren't hospitalized"? I think that is what you meant. Am I correct?

What is being tracked is the vaccinated who are hospitalized. Hospitalizations of the UN-vaccinated far far outnumber the vaccinated like 90% UN-vaccinated vs 10% vaccinated. UN-vaccinated people should seriously look at those stats and realize they need to do something to protect themselves. Either wear an N95 mask when out and about in public or get the vaccine. Seems easy enough.

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by Michael G.

Can you remember back in grade school getting shots for measles, mumps, chicken pox, pneumonia and polo etc?
Can you also recall there was no choice to get vaccinated like the covid19 shot today, everybody get the shot?

What changed??

You always had a choice...