[charlieo1126@gmail.com]

Originally Posted by Two Bills

There is a report on the "other" site this morning of a CYV being reported for wrong shingles on roof.
They were there when buyer purchased home.
Multiple/many/several/ quite a few, other roofs of same material/color are also out of compliance in same location, but have not been reported.
Going to be a costly lesson.
May have even been a "Free" roof.

wrong she hired the roofer in 2020 to put new roof on ,the fault is on her not anyone else , it’s tough but buyer beware, almost all the roofers doing business in the villages know these rules and have to get building permits , it should have been caught before it was completed

[Quietman]

Don't they dig up the flowers at intersection R-O-W whenever they need to (without any extrea effort) ????

[BlueStarAirlines]

Originally Posted by Cobullymom

Wow, exactly why I left, Karen..

So......you don't even live here?? I never understood the need to read\comment on a place I formally lived. A lot of people Facebook stalk old girlfriends and wives, so maybe its the same compulsion.....

[Bogie Shooter]

Originally Posted by Nucky

Well,well,well. Are you certain that there were no other posts on this subject since 2005 that you should have looked into before starting this thread? This is definitely Karma in action. What a waste of flowers. I feel bad for you Bogie. Take it easy on the next newbie who you want to roast for their post because it’s been discussed before. Each post is important to each poster.

New troll.

[Bogie Shooter]

Originally Posted by Vermilion Villager

How do you know if it was the same individual if they are all anonymous? I know the community standards people who contact you do not have any information about the person filing the complaint.

The complaints were emailed in with the same email address, shared by the Community Standards rep.

[roob1]

Hopefully next time they will use an anonymous email service.

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter

The complaints were emailed in with the same email address, shared by the Community Standards rep.

[Two Bills]

Originally Posted by charlieo1126@gmail.com

wrong she hired the roofer in 2020 to put new roof on ,the fault is on her not anyone else , it’s tough but buyer beware, almost all the roofers doing business in the villages know these rules and have to get building permits , it should have been caught before it was completed

Yep. Misread it.
Early in morning before coffee is my only excuse.

[nn0wheremann]

Originally Posted by rustyp

Another battle I would like to see is if a home inspection is made and a covenant violation was not identified then the inspection company should be financially liable for correction. None of this BS of returning the cost of the inspection.

Or, if the sale was made through The Villages real estate sales office, if they are liable for not disclosing the violation or remediation of the violation prior to the sale?

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by jimjamuser

You have made a good point about "FLOWERS". But, don't forget that "flowers" usually have a stalk that supports the "flowers" up to some certain height. Suppose that the stalk height is 3 ft or 4 ft. Now we have a bush with flowers and that could present a visual safety hazard for oncoming vehicles;
......Now that 13 ft back from the street seems WAY excessive, maybe 5 or 6 ft would be reasonable.
.......At the exit of the Southside pool there is a large bush that forces cars to go out into the middle of the street in order to see if other cars are coming. That is a safety hazard created by plants and it is 2 ft from the road and it is on Village property, not a resident's.
.......The excessive plants on ALL the roundabouts create a traffic safety hazard.
........Just saying that it is possible for plants to create a LEGITIMATE hazard and therefore a need to be written up.
........I can't make a judgment in this particular case because there are other factors like is the street straight or does it curve. And other factors.

The "13 feet" is to allow utility or emergency equipment access as needed. Think interns of an alleyway behind or between homes.

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by Two Bills

Yep. Misread it.
Early in morning before coffee is my only excuse.

Excellent excuse! You have been exonerated. Release the prisoner.

[John Mayes]

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby

Because these weren't neighbors. They were people living in one area of the villages, reporting people living in a different part of the villages. They don't really care that these peoples' yards violate code, because they have no need or reason to ever be in those neighborhoods. They have an axe to grind. Either they think Community Standards doesn't work hard enough, or they had violations on their own property and they want everyone else to suffer, or maybe they aren't even residents of the Villages at all, and just want to annoy Villagers because it's a trendy thing to do.

This!!!

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by TerryCamlin

Wow from reading these negative mean comments you folks need a lesson in compassion. Do you wake up everyday thinking how can I make some commenter today feel miserable? Yes rules were in place but give me a break we are talking beautiful flowers how on earth could this be a violation?? Trolling is absolutely wrong. You have an issue with somebody give your name otherwise you are just a coward,

FYI! Trolls have no heart, therefore, no compassion. They hate every flower except stink weed. And they eat babies, furry or shaved.

[Whitley]

Originally Posted by dewilson58

It's none of "perhaps" which you post.

It's a troll, 25 complains and on a street the complainer probably does not live.

Yes, a real coward's way.

Speaks volumes about the person.

I agree with you 100%. It is as sad as someone who needs to identify as a specific type of person in order to give their life meaning. "Today I am going to go and measure how far the pansy is from the road" or "I am going to show how clever I am by inserting my objection to the second amendment to a post about pansies and petunias".

[Kathyo]

Originally Posted by dewilson58

It's none of "perhaps" which you post.

It's a troll, 25 complains and on a street the complainer probably does not live.

Yes, a real coward's way.

Speaks volumes about the person.

As someone suggested perhaps only accepting complaints from people that live in their own village would help. But the bottom line still is - Why do you want to know who made the complaint. What would you do with that information? I would love to hear the honest answer to that question.

[Bill14564]

Can someone point me to the deed restriction that mentions no flowers in a 13' easement?

I can find mention of a 10' easement but no mention of flowers. Even if "no flowers" is understood as a standard restriction on an easement, I still don't see 13' mentioned.