Response time for EMS Response time for EMS - Page 2 - Talk of The Villages Florida

Response time for EMS

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 10-21-2013, 12:02 PM
Erijo Erijo is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Sanibel
Posts: 259
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Can someone explain to me, if an ambulance is called and used to go to TV hospital, is there a charge for this? Or is this service covered in our amenity fee?
  #17  
Old 10-21-2013, 01:24 PM
HMLRHT1's Avatar
HMLRHT1 HMLRHT1 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Village of Duval
Posts: 355
Thanks: 22
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

U will be charged for the ambulance bill
  #18  
Old 10-21-2013, 04:12 PM
Erijo Erijo is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Sanibel
Posts: 259
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

All new to me...how much is an ambulance bill?
  #19  
Old 10-22-2013, 10:35 AM
Johnrtff Johnrtff is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D&Lsunfun View Post
Last Saturday (330pm) at Sweet Bay in Pinellas Park,
a shopper (male) was shopping and passed out and hit his head on the floor.
My husband rushed to his aid, as I went to the front of the store to ask someone to call 911. After about 10 minutes, a police officer arrived from Wildwood then another 10 minutes The Villages fire truck, after that the firemen called for EMS. Total time 30 minutes. If anyone knows this gentlemen, please post if he recovered and his condition. Should it take that long for a emergency team to arrive?
Are the times you quoted accurate?
The fire department first responders should have been on the scene in around five minutes.
They than determine whether the ems should respond fast or slow by the extent of the injuries of the patient. Than again the first police officer on the scene could have made the call for a fast or slow response. This is done because there have been too many deaths and injuries due to all out quick response by our public safety personnel on our roads.
I am a retired firefighter/paramedic.
  #20  
Old 10-22-2013, 10:36 AM
HMLRHT1's Avatar
HMLRHT1 HMLRHT1 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Village of Duval
Posts: 355
Thanks: 22
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Info I have gotten from my daughter who is a medic south of Orlando is a basic ambulance with two EMT's will probably cost between $1000-$1200. If you get a medic unit and they do any treatmeant it will go up from there. Most often this is covered in part or in whole by ur health ins. Or if an auto accident then by ur car ins.
  #21  
Old 10-22-2013, 10:47 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,783 Times in 2,004 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HMLRHT1 View Post
Info I have gotten from my daughter who is a medic south of Orlando is a basic ambulance with two EMT's will probably cost between $1000-$1200. If you get a medic unit and they do any treatmeant it will go up from there. Most often this is covered in part or in whole by ur health ins. Or if an auto accident then by ur car ins.
Is there a charge here in TheVillages?

Where I am from in West Chester, Ohio, there is no charge for an ambulance.

Perhaps this is something we all think will be like from whence we came.

Is there a fee for EMS?
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #22  
Old 10-22-2013, 11:29 AM
HMLRHT1's Avatar
HMLRHT1 HMLRHT1 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Village of Duval
Posts: 355
Thanks: 22
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Yes there is a fee. It will be from Rural Metro who has the contract to provide EMS for Sumter County. They are the ones in the blue Sumter County ambulances. The Villages does not charge for the paramedics to show up but when the ambulance shows up and transports you to the hospital there will be charges to you.
  #23  
Old 10-22-2013, 11:39 AM
HMLRHT1's Avatar
HMLRHT1 HMLRHT1 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Village of Duval
Posts: 355
Thanks: 22
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnrtff View Post
Are the times you quoted accurate?
The fire department first responders should have been on the scene in around five minutes.
They than determine whether the ems should respond fast or slow by the extent of the injuries of the patient. Than again the first police officer on the scene could have made the call for a fast or slow response. This is done because there have been too many deaths and injuries due to all out quick response by our public safety personnel on our roads.
I am a retired firefighter/paramedic.
Most of the time The Villages EMS is on scene in 4-5 mins from receipt of call. The ambulance/medics are dispatched simultaneously and may arrive before or after the firefighter/medics. But if everyone is busy and units have to stage to cover other areas or they are all busy and have to rely on mutual aid then obviously it will take longer.
  #24  
Old 10-22-2013, 11:51 AM
rubicon rubicon is offline
Email Reported As Spam
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 13,694
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
Default

I had an opportunity to listen to the head of this Department. It took me by surprise to hear him say that given the costs of fire trucks he was not about to let them sit idle. According to him 90% of calls were medial and 10% fire oriented. It would seem that given the critical response time for a medical emergency time would be a major factor. Perhaps I am wrong but it would seem that a fire truck would never be able to beat the response time of medical emergency vehicles??????
  #25  
Old 10-22-2013, 12:04 PM
Parker's Avatar
Parker Parker is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 847
Thanks: 1
Thanked 47 Times in 15 Posts
Default

I am always surprised when a full-fledged fire truck arrives in addition to the paramedic trucks. Why send a hugely expensive fire truck to a medical emergency? There must be a very good reason?
  #26  
Old 10-22-2013, 01:08 PM
HMLRHT1's Avatar
HMLRHT1 HMLRHT1 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Village of Duval
Posts: 355
Thanks: 22
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

There is a very good reason. Engines respond with at most 3 and usually 2 personnel on it. They come from a fixed location and are usually tied up for at most an hour on scene. The ambulance/medics are coming from a staging point but they may or may not be closer to the call. This way there are maybe 4-5 personnel on scene to help with the patient. If all are not needed then the engine goes back in service and can respond to another call. If u use an engine it can be very versatile to respond to either fire or EMS. If u have just EMS responders on an ambulance there r only 2 on a crew. Sometimes that's not enough help. Accidents, cardiac arrests, obese patients are just some of the reasons 2 man crews r insufficient.
  #27  
Old 10-22-2013, 01:17 PM
HMLRHT1's Avatar
HMLRHT1 HMLRHT1 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Village of Duval
Posts: 355
Thanks: 22
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon View Post
I had an opportunity to listen to the head of this Department. It took me by surprise to hear him say that given the costs of fire trucks he was not about to let them sit idle. According to him 90% of calls were medial and 10% fire oriented. It would seem that given the critical response time for a medical emergency time would be a major factor. Perhaps I am wrong but it would seem that a fire truck would never be able to beat the response time of medical emergency vehicles??????
Spent a long time in EMS, almost always the engine was first on scene. An engine is always easier to see and most give way to a fire truck quicker than an ambulance. It is rare that an ambulance will beat an engine but it is a race to save a life, not for a trophy. Plus in most jurisdictions u r supposed to go the speed limit or maybe 10 over.
  #28  
Old 10-22-2013, 01:28 PM
Parker's Avatar
Parker Parker is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 847
Thanks: 1
Thanked 47 Times in 15 Posts
Default

HMLRHT1, that was the first coherent answer I've ever gotten to my firetruck question.
  #29  
Old 10-23-2013, 10:29 AM
spk7951's Avatar
spk7951 spk7951 is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,285
Thanks: 7
Thanked 38 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
I am always surprised when a full-fledged fire truck arrives in addition to the paramedic trucks. Why send a hugely expensive fire truck to a medical emergency? There must be a very good reason?

One of the biggest reasons is cost savings as over the years fire dept personnel have become much more multi-function personnel. In The Villages I believe there is a 2 mile radius for fire station coverage but the ambulances cover a much larger area thus creating a slightly longer response time.
The process is supposed to work as the fire dept being the 1st responder to the medical call and will start medical treatment. The ambulance arrives and continues that treatment to the hospital.
In my years in the fire service the fire engine would almost always be 1st on scene. Another advantage to this is the turn time for the responders. A fire engine may be committed to a medical call for a short period of time while an ambulance on a medical call could be committed to that call for an hour of more.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 PM.