[Number 6]

Originally Posted by Dr Winston O Boogie jr

I have no problems with tribute bands. In fact I've played in some. You just don't normally pay a lot of money to see them. A friend of mine plays in one of the top Beatles Tribute bands in the world. These guys travel all over the world and have even won an Emmy. Tickets to see them top out at about $35.00.

I just don't like it when the billing is for a famous band and you get to see one of the members of that band and a lot of professional musicians. It happened to me a few years back when I shelled out $100 per ticket to see the Beach Boys only to find that it was Mike Love and a cast of unknowns. Sorry, but it wasn't the Beach Boys.

It's like what English JW said about Kendricks and Ruffin being The Temptations. Even though Dennis Edwards did sing on several of their later records, he alone is not the Temptations. Otis Williams was pretty much a back up singer in the group and he along with four other guys is not the Temptations. I have no problem that people go to see them and enjoy them. I just think that they should be advertised and priced according to what they are.

On the other hand, if people are willing to pay big bucks to see these acts, God Bless them for being able to get it.

Just my opinion but Jay and the Americans without Jay Black is a tribute band. That goes for the Animals without Eric Burdon, the Lovin' Spoonful without John Sebastian, Herman's Hermits without Peter Noone, the Classics 4 without Dennis Yost, well you take my point.
Hey, there is nothing wrong with this, as long as you know what you are buying I went to the Classics 4 show and it was great. I have seen a couple of dozen Beatle tribute bands and will continue to do so. I will not, however, waste my money watching Joe Butler play the autoharp and sing, "Do You Believe in Magic".

[brovelli]

Have been inside for the HS kids. It is a beautifully done theatre. I have tickets for the "State of the Villages message" and "Million Dollar Quartet" in May.

The lobby area, the old Church on the Square is still in tack, alter and all.. I would guess it wouldn't take much to actually have a "wedding there",, just rent some chairs,but don't know.

I have "heard" something awful that I think the developer should address.. (I don't have a single fact, so if someone know something, would love to hear..)
I heard that the Villages Orchestra will not be at the Sharon.. What a waste. The sound system was amazing and sitting in the seats would have made listening to wonderful music a joy. Maybe that is not true.. I can hope.
b

[Bizdoc]

Originally Posted by brovelli

I have "heard" something awful that I think the developer should address.. (I don't have a single fact, so if someone know something, would love to hear..)
I heard that the Villages Orchestra will not be at the Sharon.. What a waste. The sound system was amazing and sitting in the seats would have made listening to wonderful music a joy. Maybe that is not true.. I can hope.
b

It is true that the Philharmonic Orchestra will not be performing there for the 2015-16 season. The official reason was that they could not agree on dates which need to set far in advance for the visiting soloists.

The real reason is probably poor attendance. Other than Messiah, they had 25-50% of the seats empty this year. A sad fact of life for all orchestras is that their audiences are literally dying - the bulk of their season ticket holders (and patrons) are up in years. I doubt that they will be around very many more years.

And no, it isn't the seats or acoustics at Savannah Center. Plenty of other groups sell out including the various Villages Bands, Villages Symphony, and the Wisconsin Singers.

The success or failure of the Philharmonic is the responsibility of its board. Why does everyone want *The Developer* to shoulder responsibility for everything?

[rdhdleo]

Originally Posted by NJblue

While I liked the visual symmetry of the old configuration, the new building is a long way from ugly. I think SS is a good location for it. We have to remember that this building must be economically viable to survive. My guess is that part of its appeal to the devloper was the fact that, by putting it in a town center, it makes the restaurants and shops in town more profitable by virtue of more people coming into the area. More profits for the businesses mean more profits for the developer that can be used to prove in the economic viability of the performing arts center. I tip my hat to them on this and wish them luck.

BEST post yet!!! I for one feel the building blends in well, is beautiful inside and out and will be an asset to businesses in the area and those that wish to enjoy what it has to offer. The Villages has something for everyone. Variety is the spice of life. I for one am grateful we have so many versatile venues to enjoy!

[2BNTV]

Random thoughts:
1. I think SS is a beautiful square.
2. Should have Sharon Morse PAC be built in an area where ample parking with a bigger seating capacity along 466 by Bealls, would have been my choice.
3. I would have preferred KB's to be remodeled/updated and not changed.
4. Change will always happen and "who's to say", it's not for the best.

Last time I looked, the developer didn't ask my opinion on what is to be built and where, and they have done a great job in building the most beautiful retirement community ever!!!

Time to "let it be" and be happy!!!

[brovelli]

I was thinking it was a financial decision.. not a no. of people issue.. Just for the music,
(Financial would be developer.)
Have been here for almost 8 years. Yes, the villages are growing and growning.. but it has to meet the needs of the new residents..
(Hence Pinellas and Trevare Plazas.)

Things will be fine... don't worry.. Have a great day.

[Taltarzac725]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlJ9rW41C6M


The Sharon actually looks better now. I have not been to Spanish Springs Square in a year or so. Or, if I had been was not paying much attention to the Sharon's progress. I did see it last April or so when family members were visiting.

[Challenger]

Can we get an eye witness assessment on the parking- from someone who was there last night? No second hand or rumors please.

[perrjojo]

Originally Posted by Challenger

Can we get an eye witness assessment on the parking- from someone who was there last night? No second hand or rumors please.

The doors opened at 6:30 and we arrived about 6:45. We parked behind the Movie theater and there was ample parking. Valet parking was available and there were at least 10 young men available to park cars, however they did not appear to be very busy.

[Challenger]

Originally Posted by perrjojo

The doors opened at 6:30 and we arrived about 6:45. We parked behind the Movie theater and there was ample parking. Valet parking was available and there were at least 10 young men available to park cars, however they did not appear to be very busy.

Another dire speculation, conspiracy theory blown to bits. What's a naysayer to do.

[Bogie Shooter]

Originally Posted by Challenger

Another dire speculation, conspiracy theory blown to bits. What's a naysayer to do.

Wait a couple weeks and start a new thread...........with the same dire warning!

[graciegirl]

Originally Posted by Allegiance

I have read the other threads on The Sharon and some people think it was a bad idea, parking etc. People have personally told me that previous surveys have suggested against it being built but the Developer built regardless. I walk by The Sharon most mornings and I have to say I think its ugly. It kinda looks like a prison with a cross on top. Is it just me?

If they wanted more commercial space could they have not incorporated it into the perimeter of that prison warehouse looking Sharon, instead of dooming Katie Belles? They could have had their theater and a bustling beautiful building. The idea of The Sharon makes no sense in a Square, fully one forth of the square will now be dead ugly unused space the vast majority of the time. Will it be used daily by the residents?

Yes yes yes... the developer has a right to do whatever they want with their hard earned money, and yes they are most likely smarter than the rest of us. The question is ... is it ugly? Does it belong in a square? I would do this post as a survey if I knew how and had the rights.

PS...Why do some people never ever criticize the developer?



They are not God.

:b igbow:

The Sharon - The Temptations