The Villages CDD 1-11 Recycling RIP The Villages CDD 1-11 Recycling RIP - Page 3 - Talk of The Villages Florida

The Villages CDD 1-11 Recycling RIP

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 05-08-2020, 08:58 AM
New Englander New Englander is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Massachusetts, Pinellas, Now Sanibel
Posts: 2,205
Thanks: 760
Thanked 1,458 Times in 508 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ficoguy View Post
China now wants to send us their paper and plastic
Instead, they sent the world a PANDEMIC.
  #32  
Old 05-08-2020, 09:06 AM
Koapaka Koapaka is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 464
Thanks: 1,860
Thanked 650 Times in 226 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteToast View Post
It’s just plain irresponsible to throw glass, plastic, aluminum into landfills. <shaking my head>.
You have missed the point....it is only IMPORTANT to TPTB when it is PROFITABLE....they sell the idea to make money, and then shun it when it no longer benefits them. Kinda like paying for "carbon credits".
  #33  
Old 05-08-2020, 09:16 AM
UpNorth UpNorth is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sometimes here, sometimes there
Posts: 1,006
Thanks: 141
Thanked 874 Times in 313 Posts
Default

In many states there is a deposit on beverage containers. I would think this is a significant percentage of the recyclables down here.
Even if it is a PITA to return them back to the stores and it may not be economical in the long run, it does eliminate this one form of trash from the roads. I would think that aluminum cans and plastic bottles could be recycled more efficiently than if simply thrown in a bag with other recyclables.
  #34  
Old 05-08-2020, 09:33 AM
sloanst sloanst is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 188
Thanks: 79
Thanked 155 Times in 76 Posts
Default

Sorry, but we should do zero business with China, ever
  #35  
Old 05-08-2020, 09:41 AM
billethkid's Avatar
billethkid billethkid is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4,871 Times in 1,420 Posts
Default

Priority? Politics and $$$$$!
  #36  
Old 05-08-2020, 09:48 AM
DeafDeaf's Avatar
DeafDeaf DeafDeaf is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 122
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
Default Disappointed on two points

1. The packing styrofoam materials are not recyclable and are buried in the dump forever!

2. The shredded paper in the bag is disposed to the dump instead of being recyclable because the recycling companies do not want any shredded stuff directly from people - they prefer doing shredding themselves.

  #37  
Old 05-08-2020, 10:12 AM
mulligan mulligan is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,989
Thanks: 17
Thanked 349 Times in 156 Posts
Default

They did specify that 100% of waste will go to a trash burner. Nothing to a landfill but ash.
__________________
........American by birth....Union by choice
  #38  
Old 05-08-2020, 10:31 AM
SnowflakeinDeLaVista SnowflakeinDeLaVista is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 22
Thanks: 1
Thanked 24 Times in 10 Posts
Default

It is my understanding that many recycling programs across the country are ending. Recycling is a complex process. In many cases, recycling requires chemicals and processes that are dangerous to breathe and drink if allowed to escape into the air and water. Communities across the United States want recycling to be done—only elsewhere. Large numbers of recycling agencies began shipping recyclables to other countries long ago. China was apparently a primary destination for US recyclables and they were essentially going into landfills there rather than actually being recycled. During the trade war with China, the Chinese government adopted a policy of no longer accepting what amounts to monthly tons of US garbage. Municipalities all over the US have been struggling to figure out what to do with our recycling, with much of it actually going to landfills for some time now. This new policy most likely reflects what’s been already happening for months.
  #39  
Old 05-08-2020, 10:34 AM
NoMoSno NoMoSno is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,340
Thanks: 189
Thanked 367 Times in 230 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowflakeinDeLaVista View Post
It is my understanding that many recycling programs across the country are ending. Recycling is a complex process. In many cases, recycling requires chemicals and processes that are dangerous to breathe and drink if allowed to escape into the air and water. Communities across the United States want recycling to be done—only elsewhere. Large numbers of recycling agencies began shipping recyclables to other countries long ago. China was apparently a primary destination for US recyclables and they were essentially going into landfills there rather than actually being recycled. During the trade war with China, the Chinese government adopted a policy of no longer accepting what amounts to monthly tons of US garbage. Municipalities all over the US have been struggling to figure out what to do with our recycling, with much of it actually going to landfills for some time now. This new policy most likely reflects what’s been already happening for months.
Had nothing to do with a trade war.
China's “National Sword” policy, enacted in January 2018, banned the import of most plastics and other materials headed for that nation's recycling processors, which had handled nearly half of the world's recyclable waste for the past quarter century.
Why the world’s recycling system stopped working | Financial Times

Last edited by NoMoSno; 05-08-2020 at 10:42 AM.
  #40  
Old 05-08-2020, 10:36 AM
kcrazorbackfan's Avatar
kcrazorbackfan kcrazorbackfan is offline
Sage
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: The Villages, FL
Posts: 3,650
Thanks: 251
Thanked 1,697 Times in 577 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby View Post
In the meantime, we can try to re-use, when practical. If you have a cat, don't buy bags for the litter box. Re-use the grocery bags you get when you go grocery shopping.

If you prefer spring water, and like carrying water around with you, then buy the bigger 1-gallon or even 2.5-gallon jugs, and refill a re-useable drink cup instead of buying a case of 24 1/2-liter bottles every month.

Paper bags can be used when you're weeding the garden, all those take-home bags you get from Taco Bell, Burger King, Culver's etc are great for that.

Buy the biggest bottle of cleaner, laundry detergent, paper towels, TP, sponges, as you possibly can. Why? Less packaging waste. You can buy big half-gallon bottles of liquid hand soap, and refill a pretty soap pump for your bathrooms instead of buying a new pump container every time you run low.
Protest the companies that create extra waste, by buying whatever soaps use the least amount of packaging. I know some have a bar wrapped in paper or plastic, and THAT put into a cardboard box. For why? Because it looks good, and they pretend it justifies the higher cost for the consumer. In fact - you could buy from a local soapmaker - you pay more per ounce, but you get hardly any packaging at all, your choice of scents, and a much more interesting-looking bar for your bathroom, while supporting a local cottage industry all at the same time.

These are all little things that won't make all that much of a dent in saving the planet. But if everyone did it, it'd be a pretty nice sized dent.
Good ideas! Thanks
__________________
If you see something that’s not right, say something.
  #41  
Old 05-08-2020, 10:40 AM
JoMar JoMar is offline
Sage
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,984
Thanks: 10
Thanked 2,487 Times in 945 Posts
Default

So many opinions, so little knowledge......so much, it's some one elses problem to fix and if they don't fix it my way they are irresponsible. Do we really believe that if recycling provided an acceptable return on investment there wouldn't be investors lining up?
__________________
No one believes the truth when the lie is more interesting

Berks County Pennsylvania
  #42  
Old 05-08-2020, 10:43 AM
nevjudbaker nevjudbaker is offline
Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 92
Thanks: 94
Thanked 61 Times in 36 Posts
Default

I remember back in my childhood black smoke coming from the manufacturing places & semi trucks. Now you see white smoke. If it can be done the single stream is better & far more economical. I do like taking my own bags to the grocery store. They pack & stack better. They are much easier to lift from the cart to my trunk. The insulated bags go on the counter closest to the refrigerator & non-insulated bags go on counters closer to other supplies. I do agree we all can make an effort to reuse containers. I now make my own insect repellent so I reuse the bottles. Egg cartoons in my childhood were made of a different material than the ones todayy. If we burn the garbage can the melted plastic still be used with concrete for roads and home building products?
  #43  
Old 05-08-2020, 10:46 AM
MzzJodi MzzJodi is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiserbud47 View Post
The North Sumter County Utility Dependent District meet May 6 and has decided to move ahead with the "single stream" of trash, recyclables and yard waste. A contract is being worked out and it will be voted on at their June 8 meeting.
I am very disappointed, but not surprised. There is no money in recycling and the idea that it may help our earth is not part of the decision.
Most of us grow up throwing everything into the "garbage". The garbage was then brought to an incinerator and burned. Years later, burning was considered bad for our environment and they brought it to the dump. Next, the dumps were filling up and it was decided to try to "recycle" certain items. Now they are telling us to "single stream", which means throw everything into the garbage so they can take it to the incinerator and burn it (make energy).
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
I feel sad to loss recycling. I was finally getting the hang of it.
This has already been instituted in Ocala.
  #44  
Old 05-08-2020, 10:53 AM
17362's Avatar
17362 17362 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Chatham Village
Posts: 114
Thanks: 584
Thanked 76 Times in 42 Posts
Default

We have been recycling for over 20 years. We are from Oregon and for us this was taking a huge step back in time. I remember how hard it was to switch the mind set. I just can’t help but wonder places like where we came from made this work in a huge scale- why can’t Florida follow their model and then the counties, cities will follow suit- just like what happened there.
I makes me sad when someone comes up with a great working model and no one sees it to repeat it.
There was time when Oregon was number one at recycling. Now that about the only thing I am going to tout for them.
But I do know this... it took the state to get involved for it to work on a mass level and economic feasibility.
That being said, I am not a proponent for state involvement but apparently at this, it was a good working model for all and earth.
  #45  
Old 05-08-2020, 11:02 AM
17362's Avatar
17362 17362 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Chatham Village
Posts: 114
Thanks: 584
Thanked 76 Times in 42 Posts
Default

Over in the left and up north, there is a deposit and return $, there are large recycle centers where you take your items, allowed 2 bags a day, and they hire and staff these buildings where you take your bottle deposit items and they credit your account which then can be used at the grocery stores or you go there and cash out your account when you want. The stores are all for this, that way they don’t have to deal with it at all. The facilities employ people. The mass bottles and cans (daily consumption kind) don’t become landfill) win -win

Last edited by 17362; 05-08-2020 at 11:05 AM. Reason: Adding to it
Closed Thread

Tags
garbage, recycling, stream, single, decided


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 AM.