Golf course jobs

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-10-2023, 06:48 AM
nhbear nhbear is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 7
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Default Golf course jobs

1000 GOLF COURSE JOBS to be taken over by DISTRICT RESIDENTS good or bad ?
https://www.**************.com/2023/...-golf-courses/he
Developer wants to shed the responsibility for the 1,000 employees at golf courses in The Villages.

Members of the Amenity Authority Committee, with some suspicion, wrestled on Wednesday with the notice from the Developer that he would like to cease providing staffing for executive and championship golf courses.

“It’s the natural progression and how we do things in The Villages,” said Deputy District Manager Carrie Duckett.

The 1,000 ambassadors, starter shack employees and Golf Operations Administrator David Williams would all begin receiving their paychecks from The Villages District government, rather than the Developer.
“It’s going to be the same starters and people. But rather than working for the Developer, they will be paid by the District. Residents won’t see a change,” Duckett said.

At least in the beginning, the AAC would not be paying more for the staffing of the executive golf courses. The AAC already pays a service fee to the Developer who is currently providing the executive golf course staff.

The AAC already has budgeted $1.7 million to pay the Developer for staffing executive golf courses north of County Road 466. The amount includes a 5 percent surcharge paid to the Developer, amounting to about $90,000. The AAC would be saving the $90,000 surcharge.

The Developer will pay the District for providing staff at championship courses, just as the Developer pays for Recreation Department staffers to work at recreation centers still owned by the Developer.

AAC member Don Deakin wondered whether golf course workers would still receive the discount they currently receive when playing at championship courses.

“Many of them have told me that they aren’t working for minimum wage, they are working so they get that discount,” Deakin said. “Would we lose 1,000 employees if the Developer suddenly wasn’t offering that discount?”

He also said that too many times the AAC has been rushed to make a decision on an important issue and later came to regret the decision. He pointed specifically to the push by the Developer in 2019 for the AAC to purchase the Hacienda Country Club. In the end, the Developer demolished the country club, which upset many residents.

“I am not in favor of rushing through deals like this,” Deakin said.

He said he wanted more information and time to evaluate the contract to terminate the existing agreement.

Community Development District 4 Chairman Cliff Wiener, who also heads the Property Owners Association, said there is likely more to the story about the motives of the Developer.

“If the Developer was making a profit, he wouldn’t want to get out of it,” Wiener said.

AAC member James Vaccaro questioned picking up the tab for a potentially hefty salary for the golf operations administrator.

“Don’t we already have enough managers?” he asked.

It was also indicated that the starters and ambassadors would likely be offered dental and vision benefits when they become District employees. Residents pointed out there would be a cost associated with the benefits.

In the end, the AAC voted 4-1 in favor of the Developer’s request to terminate the existing agreement and move forward with a new agreement.

The change will take place Oct. 1.

The Project Wide Advisory Committee, which oversees amenities south of County Road 466, will discuss this same issue when its members meet at 8:30 a.m. Monday, Aug. 14 at SeaBreeze Recreation Center.

Last edited by nhbear; 08-10-2023 at 06:56 AM.
  #2  
Old 08-10-2023, 06:50 AM
ThirdOfFive ThirdOfFive is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,448
Thanks: 759
Thanked 5,479 Times in 1,854 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nhbear View Post
1000 GOLF COURSE JOBS to be taken over by DISTRICT RESIDENTS good or bad ?
https://www.**************.com/2023/...-golf-courses/
Hmmmm.

The link doesn't seem to be working.
  #3  
Old 08-10-2023, 06:59 AM
drcar drcar is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 479
Thanks: 90
Thanked 332 Times in 131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nhbear View Post
1000 GOLF COURSE JOBS to be taken over by DISTRICT RESIDENTS good or bad ?
https://www.**************.com/2023/...-golf-courses/he
Developer wants to shed the responsibility for the 1,000 employees at golf courses in The Villages.

Members of the Amenity Authority Committee, with some suspicion, wrestled on Wednesday with the notice from the Developer that he would like to cease providing staffing for executive and championship golf courses.

“It’s the natural progression and how we do things in The Villages,” said Deputy District Manager Carrie Duckett.

The 1,000 ambassadors, starter shack employees and Golf Operations Administrator David Williams would all begin receiving their paychecks from The Villages District government, rather than the Developer.
“It’s going to be the same starters and people. But rather than working for the Developer, they will be paid by the District. Residents won’t see a change,” Duckett said.

At least in the beginning, the AAC would not be paying more for the staffing of the executive golf courses. The AAC already pays a service fee to the Developer who is currently providing the executive golf course staff.

The AAC already has budgeted $1.7 million to pay the Developer for staffing executive golf courses north of County Road 466. The amount includes a 5 percent surcharge paid to the Developer, amounting to about $90,000. The AAC would be saving the $90,000 surcharge.

The Developer will pay the District for providing staff at championship courses, just as the Developer pays for Recreation Department staffers to work at recreation centers still owned by the Developer.

AAC member Don Deakin wondered whether golf course workers would still receive the discount they currently receive when playing at championship courses.

“Many of them have told me that they aren’t working for minimum wage, they are working so they get that discount,” Deakin said. “Would we lose 1,000 employees if the Developer suddenly wasn’t offering that discount?”

He also said that too many times the AAC has been rushed to make a decision on an important issue and later came to regret the decision. He pointed specifically to the push by the Developer in 2019 for the AAC to purchase the Hacienda Country Club. In the end, the Developer demolished the country club, which upset many residents.

“I am not in favor of rushing through deals like this,” Deakin said.

He said he wanted more information and time to evaluate the contract to terminate the existing agreement.

Community Development District 4 Chairman Cliff Wiener, who also heads the Property Owners Association, said there is likely more to the story about the motives of the Developer.

“If the Developer was making a profit, he wouldn’t want to get out of it,” Wiener said.

AAC member James Vaccaro questioned picking up the tab for a potentially hefty salary for the golf operations administrator.

“Don’t we already have enough managers?” he asked.

It was also indicated that the starters and ambassadors would likely be offered dental and vision benefits when they become District employees. Residents pointed out there would be a cost associated with the benefits.

In the end, the AAC voted 4-1 in favor of the Developer’s request to terminate the existing agreement and move forward with a new agreement.

The change will take place Oct. 1.

The Project Wide Advisory Committee, which oversees amenities south of County Road 466, will discuss this same issue when its members meet at 8:30 a.m. Monday, Aug. 14 at SeaBreeze Recreation Center.
Thanks for reproducing the story, but what is your point?
  #4  
Old 08-10-2023, 07:00 AM
BrianL99 BrianL99 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 3,228
Thanks: 295
Thanked 3,247 Times in 1,250 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nhbear View Post
1000 GOLF COURSE JOBS to be taken over by DISTRICT RESIDENTS good or bad ?
https://www.**************.com/2023/...-golf-courses/he
Developer wants to shed the responsibility for the 1,000 employees at golf courses in The Villages.

Members of the Amenity Authority Committee, with some suspicion, wrestled on Wednesday with the notice from the Developer that he would like to cease providing staffing for executive and championship golf courses.

“It’s the natural progression and how we do things in The Villages,” said Deputy District Manager Carrie Duckett.

The 1,000 ambassadors, starter shack employees and Golf Operations Administrator David Williams would all begin receiving their paychecks from The Villages District government, rather than the Developer.
“It’s going to be the same starters and people. But rather than working for the Developer, they will be paid by the District. Residents won’t see a change,” Duckett said.

At least in the beginning, the AAC would not be paying more for the staffing of the executive golf courses. The AAC already pays a service fee to the Developer who is currently providing the executive golf course staff.

The AAC already has budgeted $1.7 million to pay the Developer for staffing executive golf courses north of County Road 466. The amount includes a 5 percent surcharge paid to the Developer, amounting to about $90,000. The AAC would be saving the $90,000 surcharge.

The Developer will pay the District for providing staff at championship courses, just as the Developer pays for Recreation Department staffers to work at recreation centers still owned by the Developer.

AAC member Don Deakin wondered whether golf course workers would still receive the discount they currently receive when playing at championship courses.

“Many of them have told me that they aren’t working for minimum wage, they are working so they get that discount,” Deakin said. “Would we lose 1,000 employees if the Developer suddenly wasn’t offering that discount?”

He also said that too many times the AAC has been rushed to make a decision on an important issue and later came to regret the decision. He pointed specifically to the push by the Developer in 2019 for the AAC to purchase the Hacienda Country Club. In the end, the Developer demolished the country club, which upset many residents.

“I am not in favor of rushing through deals like this,” Deakin said.

He said he wanted more information and time to evaluate the contract to terminate the existing agreement.

Community Development District 4 Chairman Cliff Wiener, who also heads the Property Owners Association, said there is likely more to the story about the motives of the Developer.

“If the Developer was making a profit, he wouldn’t want to get out of it,” Wiener said.

AAC member James Vaccaro questioned picking up the tab for a potentially hefty salary for the golf operations administrator.

“Don’t we already have enough managers?” he asked.

It was also indicated that the starters and ambassadors would likely be offered dental and vision benefits when they become District employees. Residents pointed out there would be a cost associated with the benefits.

In the end, the AAC voted 4-1 in favor of the Developer’s request to terminate the existing agreement and move forward with a new agreement.

The change will take place Oct. 1.

The Project Wide Advisory Committee, which oversees amenities south of County Road 466, will discuss this same issue when its members meet at 8:30 a.m. Monday, Aug. 14 at SeaBreeze Recreation Center.

A disaster in the making.
  #5  
Old 08-10-2023, 07:04 AM
drcar drcar is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 479
Thanks: 90
Thanked 332 Times in 131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
A disaster in the making.
Interesting quote, why do you say "A disaster in the making."
  #6  
Old 08-10-2023, 07:48 AM
billethkid's Avatar
billethkid billethkid is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,536
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4,878 Times in 1,419 Posts
Default

Never let the inmates run the institution

__________________________________________________ _______

  #7  
Old 08-10-2023, 08:17 AM
Arlington2 Arlington2 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 193
Thanks: 1
Thanked 137 Times in 68 Posts
Default

It will be a complicated and confusing process. Employees of VCCD are government employees. Benefits will change. For instance, employees will not pay SS, but will be able to put money into a tax deferred 401. The VCCD does not match employee contributions to the 401. It is not obvious how a government employee can legally service a private enterprise such as the championship golf courses. It is one thing for a government to contract out work to private companies, but something entirely different for a private company to hire government employees. It is also not obvious how a government employee can legally accept preferential discounts at the country club. I am sure the developer has thought through the process, but I hope the ACC is looking at it with eyes wide open.
  #8  
Old 08-10-2023, 08:36 AM
Two Bills Two Bills is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,342
Thanks: 1,812
Thanked 8,103 Times in 2,840 Posts
Default

“It’s the natural progression and how we do things in The Villages,” said Deputy District Manager Carrie Duckett.
Does that mean, " We unload anything not making us a profit, and is a chain round our neck"




"Beware of Greeks bearing gifts!"

Last edited by Two Bills; 08-10-2023 at 08:43 AM.
  #9  
Old 08-10-2023, 12:16 PM
drcar drcar is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 479
Thanks: 90
Thanked 332 Times in 131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Two Bills View Post
“It’s the natural progression and how we do things in The Villages,” said Deputy District Manager Carrie Duckett.
Does that mean, " We unload anything not making us a profit, and is a chain round our neck"




"Beware of Greeks bearing gifts!"
Interesting how residents jump to their own conclusions. The Villages will still own the courses, AND will STILL make the profit. They are just turning over the staffing duties to the Districts.
  #10  
Old 08-10-2023, 12:30 PM
alwann's Avatar
alwann alwann is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Village of Gilchrist
Posts: 912
Thanks: 3
Thanked 786 Times in 243 Posts
Default Fees

Quote:
Originally Posted by drcar View Post
Interesting how residents jump to their own conclusions. The Villages will still own the courses, AND will STILL make the profit. They are just turning over the staffing duties to the Districts.
The Developer will own the championship courses, the District will handle the operations, so who will set the green fees and enhancements rates? Who does that now?
  #11  
Old 08-10-2023, 02:11 PM
LuvtheVillages LuvtheVillages is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Tamarind Grove
Posts: 536
Thanks: 240
Thanked 763 Times in 243 Posts
Default

I talked recently with a friend who is employed on a golf course. The employees have known about this for a while, have had to fill out paperwork, and been told the change is as of Oct 1.

Interesting that the AAC and Projectwide committees are just now being asked to sign off on this. Almost like the Developer sets the agenda and the AAC and Projectwide are expected to rubberstamp whatever he wants.

Will the golf employees have to be offered the same benefits package as other employees, or can they be a separate class? Will their championship discount continue? What is the effect of Florida's new minimum wage law, stepping up to $15/hour in annual steps? (Which also increases the FICA tax due.) Will we be paid a fee for managing the staffing at the championship courses? How much? Percentage or flat dollar rate?

That's just off the top of my head. There must be a lot of questions to address before committing to a big change like this. The decision should not be hurried.

If I were the suspicious type, I would think the developer is dumping a cost burden caused by the increasing minimum wage. He already cut back staffing to offset the increases so far. Perhaps there are no more cuts to be made and now the costs will rise quickly.
  #12  
Old 08-10-2023, 02:20 PM
bcsnave's Avatar
bcsnave bcsnave is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: TV
Posts: 198
Thanks: 250
Thanked 103 Times in 57 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThirdOfFive View Post
Hmmmm.

The link doesn't seem to be working.
Not for me either
  #13  
Old 08-10-2023, 06:35 PM
wisbad1 wisbad1 is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 636
Thanks: 3,219
Thanked 564 Times in 209 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arlington2 View Post
It will be a complicated and confusing process. Employees of VCCD are government employees. Benefits will change. For instance, employees will not pay SS, but will be able to put money into a tax deferred 401. The VCCD does not match employee contributions to the 401. It is not obvious how a government employee can legally service a private enterprise such as the championship golf courses. It is one thing for a government to contract out work to private companies, but something entirely different for a private company to hire government employees. It is also not obvious how a government employee can legally accept preferential discounts at the country club. I am sure the developer has thought through the process, but I hope the ACC is looking at it with eyes wide open.
Exactly!
  #14  
Old 08-10-2023, 08:19 PM
tophcfa's Avatar
tophcfa tophcfa is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
Posts: 7,411
Thanks: 3,483
Thanked 10,815 Times in 3,433 Posts
Default

This doesn’t pass the sniff test. There is a history of residents getting the short end of the straw. Examples include the sale of utilities at inflated asset values hurting ratepayers, the infamous windmill and water tower in Brownwood, or the sale of the El Santiago Recreation Center. And when the other party says no to a seemingly forced transaction, the response is to tear everything down like at Hacienda Hills. I sincerely hope I’m wrong on this, but I don’t think it will turn out favorably for the residents? Stay tuned.
  #15  
Old 08-10-2023, 10:31 PM
pokeefe45@aol.com pokeefe45@aol.com is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 100
Thanks: 1
Thanked 105 Times in 49 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LuvtheVillages View Post
I talked recently with a friend who is employed on a golf course. The employees have known about this for a while, have had to fill out paperwork, and been told the change is as of Oct 1.

Interesting that the AAC and Projectwide committees are just now being asked to sign off on this. Almost like the Developer sets the agenda and the AAC and Projectwide are expected to rubberstamp whatever he wants.

Will the golf employees have to be offered the same benefits package as other employees, or can they be a separate class? Will their championship discount continue? What is the effect of Florida's new minimum wage law, stepping up to $15/hour in annual steps? (Which also increases the FICA tax due.) Will we be paid a fee for managing the staffing at the championship courses? How much? Percentage or flat dollar rate?

That's just off the top of my head. There must be a lot of questions to address before committing to a big change like this. The decision should not be hurried.

If I were the suspicious type, I would think the developer is dumping a cost burden caused by the increasing minimum wage. He already cut back staffing to offset the increases so far. Perhaps there are no more cuts to be made and now the costs will rise quickly.
Noone (or more exactly-none of us-to the best of my knowledge) working for the Championship courses knew about this prior to 2 days before it was published in the paper, including most or all of the Golf Pro's who manage the courses. 'Paperwork' will begin to be filled out at VCCD held orientations beginning next week. I don't believe the change is up for discussion, as it's already a done deal. As the article stated the AAC already gave it a 4-1 yes vote ,which I believe would have been the last hurdle, or one of the last anyhow. The minimum wage increase will continue to happen every September, and parity between what recreation facility workers, already employed by the VCCD make and the golf course staff will happen when the change becomes official on October 1. It's been explained (to us) and it feels like that this is just a matter of putting the administration of human resources where it can be done more easily and more successfully. The developer will be more successful when they focus on developing, rather than operating, and the VCCD already has an infrastructure in place to do it better and more efficiently. IMHO-if the change mandates that the 'Championship Golf Discount' goes away for current employees, it's likely that violence on the first tee will become commonplace, as there will be no golf employees left!
Closed Thread

Tags
golf, jobs, district, residents, good


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 PM.