Why does the villages need Wildwood? Why does the villages need Wildwood? - Page 2 - Talk of The Villages Florida

Why does the villages need Wildwood?

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 12-06-2022, 10:55 PM
Calisport Calisport is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 403
Thanks: 106
Thanked 215 Times in 125 Posts
Default

I don't see anything nice in Wildwood. Everything looks run down. Who is getting the money and when are the plans starting for redevelopment?
  #17  
Old 12-07-2022, 05:24 AM
sdeikenberry sdeikenberry is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 425
Thanks: 37
Thanked 675 Times in 260 Posts
Default

Folks could always move north a ways and not be in Wildwood...no city tax...no bonds for the most part and def no bonds north of 466...closer to shopping, town squares, medical, and many more choices of those...just sayin'
  #18  
Old 12-07-2022, 06:28 AM
merrymini merrymini is online now
Veteran member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 976
Thanks: 456
Thanked 1,275 Times in 508 Posts
Default

No thanks to moving north. I am in unincorporated Wildwood and I see no difference in services so don't understand the difference and what you are paying for. Seems to be a pretty run down town and the development plan, which I have only read about in the paper, will take MONEY.
  #19  
Old 12-07-2022, 06:34 AM
Annie66 Annie66 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 417
Thanks: 81
Thanked 542 Times in 202 Posts
Default

Haven't seen this gripe before. It might become the latest ad nauseum thread like dogs pooping on neighbors' lawns, crowded squares, greedy Morris kids, etc.
  #20  
Old 12-07-2022, 07:01 AM
JerryP JerryP is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 258
Thanks: 12
Thanked 126 Times in 39 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merrymini View Post
No thanks to moving north. I am in unincorporated Wildwood and I see no difference in services so don't understand the difference and what you are paying for. Seems to be a pretty run down town and the development plan, which I have only read about in the paper, will take MONEY.
Wildwood has been incorporated since 1889.
  #21  
Old 12-07-2022, 07:11 AM
eeroger eeroger is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 207
Thanks: 3
Thanked 161 Times in 99 Posts
Default Mixed up Roads??

Quote:
Originally Posted by pauld315 View Post
When The Villages started building south of 466, one of the benefits the developers showed to be approved was that the land was or would be part of Wildwood and Wildwood would benefit from the taxes it could collect. If you remember back then, Wildwood was a very poor community with closed and boarded up stores along 301 and elsewhere. The Villages knew that they had to improve the conditions there so people would not feel threatened going to Brownwood and/or buying south of 466. Wildwood had a very bad reputation for crime back then as well. So, essentially the developer determined that the people building in that area needed to subsidize Wildwood so that it would become a nicer gateway into The Villages.
I believe you MISSPOKE. You must mean 466 'A'. The Village of Mallory is south of 466 and we are not part of Wildwood!!!
  #22  
Old 12-07-2022, 07:59 AM
coconutmama coconutmama is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 721
Thanks: 47
Thanked 410 Times in 232 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calisport View Post
I don't see anything nice in Wildwood. Everything looks run down. Who is getting the money and when are the plans starting for redevelopment?
Wildwood is a typical Florida town. And actually better than many. I am sure the folks who live there are proud of it. It has some good restaurants & small shops.
  #23  
Old 12-07-2022, 08:16 AM
Worldseries27 Worldseries27 is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,657
Thanks: 362
Thanked 927 Times in 538 Posts
Default United we stand

All of our community leaders whose members live under the wildwood jurisdiction should get together as a political voting block and tell us residents what issues we should vote up or down as a group. This way we would ensure that wildwood treats us fairly.
  #24  
Old 12-07-2022, 08:17 AM
Olsenfiber Olsenfiber is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 13
Thanks: 5
Thanked 10 Times in 5 Posts
Default

They were smart enough to annex the land that the Villages was going to eventually expand into. If you go to the web: Wildwood-Fl.Gov, and look at the Wildwood Comprehensive Plan 2050, Policy 1.5.5, you will see that all of land where the Age Restricted Development (ARD) referred to as The Villages of Southern Oaks, is inside the Wildwood city limits.
This is most of the developable land : South of SR44, East of 301, on both side of the Florida Turnpike, East to the Lake County line.
Will eventually include 60,449 dwelling units.
  #25  
Old 12-07-2022, 08:51 AM
Darcue Darcue is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 9
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 2 Posts
Default Why does The Villages need Wildwood?

You challenge the “wisdom” of the management of The Villages? My goodness - you must be a new resident.
__________________
Darcie - not Darcue! - I'm learning how to type....
  #26  
Old 12-07-2022, 09:28 AM
sallyg sallyg is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 432
Thanks: 1,187
Thanked 235 Times in 158 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calisport View Post
I don't see anything nice in Wildwood. Everything looks run down. Who is getting the money and when are the plans starting for redevelopment?
Good question. I have a feeling we won't recognize downtown Wildwood in a few years.
  #27  
Old 12-07-2022, 10:03 AM
Chi-Town's Avatar
Chi-Town Chi-Town is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,506
Thanks: 192
Thanked 1,484 Times in 717 Posts
Default

Wildwood was an important railroad town, and when that ended there was the usual deterioration with no plan. Until now. The Villages is a godsend, and hopefully the revitalization will soon occur. It is a blighted eyesore.
  #28  
Old 12-07-2022, 10:59 AM
kansasr kansasr is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 836
Thanks: 264
Thanked 997 Times in 292 Posts
Default

One correction...Wildwood did not decided to annex these areas. The developer petitioned Wildwood to have these lands annexed by the city.
  #29  
Old 12-07-2022, 11:45 AM
genobambino genobambino is offline
Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Pine Hills
Posts: 88
Thanks: 2,773
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Same crap Pineridge and Pinehills we get nothing I can see from Fruitland Park, just keep paying the city taxes and tax on our electric bill.
  #30  
Old 12-07-2022, 12:53 PM
VApeople VApeople is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,279
Thanks: 202
Thanked 1,841 Times in 695 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by genobambino View Post
Same crap Pineridge and Pinehills we get nothing I can see from Fruitland Park, just keep paying the city taxes and tax on our electric bill.
You can feel satisfied that your tax dollars are helping to fund the new sports fields and new government buildings in Fruitland Park.
Closed Thread

Tags
wildwood, fat, provide, annexed, sections

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 PM.