High altitude object shot down over US (Alaskan) territorial waters (ice) High altitude object shot down over US (Alaskan) territorial waters (ice) - Page 2 - Talk of The Villages Florida

High altitude object shot down over US (Alaskan) territorial waters (ice)

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 02-11-2023, 08:06 AM
tvbound tvbound is offline
Gold member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 1,070
Thanks: 1,934
Thanked 1,708 Times in 557 Posts
Default

Wow, the "I hate America" crowd is out in full force over the actions against these very different objects. It wouldn't have mattered if the reverse actions for these two objects had been taken, the same 'Hammer' (when you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail') crowd - would be attacking/complaining about our country's actions.

Waiting to shoot down the first balloon until we could gather as much info as possible, while blocking its ability to transmit, has turned out to be very smart. Especially since it did not have the capability of gathering anything, that isn't already being provided in much more detail with Chinese satellites. It's already resulted in 6 Chinese entities contributing to its construction in being blacklisted, which couldn't have happened had it not been allowed to continue to fly and then shot down in a recoverable location.

Taking action so soon on the second object, which was a totally different situation than the first, has also turned out to be a smart move and it too will be retrieved from a frozen Arctic Ocean.

Which simply infuriates the 'ready-shoot-aim' crowd even further.

All I can say is...USA, USA, USA. LOL
  #17  
Old 02-11-2023, 08:10 AM
ThirdOfFive ThirdOfFive is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,513
Thanks: 759
Thanked 5,545 Times in 1,884 Posts
Default

Word is that it was aimed at Miami, but it took a wrong turn at Albuquerque.
  #18  
Old 02-11-2023, 08:13 AM
Arctic Fox's Avatar
Arctic Fox Arctic Fox is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,469
Thanks: 27
Thanked 1,368 Times in 546 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Get real View Post
The Chinese gave permission to shoot it down.
Let's hope it wasn't Russian, then
  #19  
Old 02-11-2023, 09:02 AM
Blueblaze Blueblaze is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 716
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1,304 Times in 380 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoastDawg View Post
I think we can safely assume that the Chinese have technology every bit as good as anything the West can muster.
Well, we don't have George Jetson's flying car. What makes you think the Chinese do?
  #20  
Old 02-11-2023, 09:04 AM
Tvflguy's Avatar
Tvflguy Tvflguy is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 727
Thanks: 430
Thanked 1,549 Times in 426 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvbound View Post
Wow, the "I hate America" crowd is out in full force over the actions against these very different objects. It wouldn't have mattered if the reverse actions for these two objects had been taken, the same 'Hammer' (when you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail') crowd - would be attacking/complaining about our country's actions.

Waiting to shoot down the first balloon until we could gather as much info as possible, while blocking its ability to transmit, has turned out to be very smart. Especially since it did not have the capability of gathering anything, that isn't already being provided in much more detail with Chinese satellites. It's already resulted in 6 Chinese entities contributing to its construction in being blacklisted, which couldn't have happened had it not been allowed to continue to fly and then shot down in a recoverable location.

Taking action so soon on the second object, which was a totally different situation than the first, has also turned out to be a smart move and it too will be retrieved from a frozen Arctic Ocean.

Which simply infuriates the 'ready-shoot-aim' crowd even further.

All I can say is...USA, USA, USA. LOL
Wow. There was two replies to this post just earlier. IMO not controversial at all. But now they are gone. Hmmmm. One stated Keep America Great if I recall. If that was why it’s gone now, we’re in trouble.
  #21  
Old 02-11-2023, 09:07 AM
Blueblaze Blueblaze is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 716
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1,304 Times in 380 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MorTech View Post
They murdered Santa Claus, I tellz ya.
That's the most likely scenario I've heard yet. It would take magic reindeer to fly a VW to 40,000 ft.
  #22  
Old 02-11-2023, 09:15 AM
Regorp Regorp is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 512
Thanks: 816
Thanked 275 Times in 182 Posts
Default Shot down

Quote:
Originally Posted by manaboutown View Post
Could it be aliens looking for polar bears?
  #23  
Old 02-11-2023, 09:16 AM
Two Bills Two Bills is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,342
Thanks: 1,811
Thanked 8,105 Times in 2,842 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvflguy View Post
Wow. There was two replies to this post just earlier. IMO not controversial at all. But now they are gone. Hmmmm. One stated Keep America Great if I recall. If that was why it’s gone now, we’re in trouble.
One thing I learnt about when sailing, was the closer you sail to the wind, the more chance of capsizing!
  #24  
Old 02-11-2023, 09:19 AM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 7,342
Thanks: 2,278
Thanked 7,713 Times in 3,026 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvflguy View Post
Wow. There was two replies to this post just earlier. IMO not controversial at all. But now they are gone. Hmmmm. One stated Keep America Great if I recall. If that was why it’s gone now, we’re in trouble.
It's a conspiracy.

The board is run by a bunch of ..... who can't stand ......

It's a violation of our free speech! We should sue in the Supreme Court to get our money back.

OR..... The same post was made in two threads and you forgot that the those replies are in that other thread.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
  #25  
Old 02-11-2023, 09:34 AM
Get real Get real is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 250
Thanks: 73
Thanked 463 Times in 137 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
It's a conspiracy.

The board is run by a bunch of ..... who can't stand ......

It's a violation of our free speech! We should sue in the Supreme Court to get our money back.

OR..... The same post was made in two threads and you forgot that the those replies are in that other thread.
Option 1
  #26  
Old 02-11-2023, 09:54 AM
tvbound tvbound is offline
Gold member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 1,070
Thanks: 1,934
Thanked 1,708 Times in 557 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
It's a conspiracy.

The board is run by a bunch of ..... who can't stand ......

It's a violation of our free speech! We should sue in the Supreme Court to get our money back.

OR..... The same post was made in two threads and you forgot that the those replies are in that other thread.
Shhh, you're ruining a cathartic rant. lol
  #27  
Old 02-11-2023, 10:28 AM
PugMom's Avatar
PugMom PugMom is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Village of McClure
Posts: 2,833
Thanks: 15,121
Thanked 2,180 Times in 1,097 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvbound View Post
Wow, the "I hate America" crowd is out in full force over the actions against these very different objects. It wouldn't have mattered if the reverse actions for these two objects had been taken, the same 'Hammer' (when you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail') crowd - would be attacking/complaining about our country's actions.

Waiting to shoot down the first balloon until we could gather as much info as possible, while blocking its ability to transmit, has turned out to be very smart. Especially since it did not have the capability of gathering anything, that isn't already being provided in much more detail with Chinese satellites. It's already resulted in 6 Chinese entities contributing to its construction in being blacklisted, which couldn't have happened had it not been allowed to continue to fly and then shot down in a recoverable location.

Taking action so soon on the second object, which was a totally different situation than the first, has also turned out to be a smart move and it too will be retrieved from a frozen Arctic Ocean.

Which simply infuriates the 'ready-shoot-aim' crowd even further.

All I can say is...USA, USA, USA. LOL
yeah, but how many are actually out there, & for how long. the world may never know
  #28  
Old 02-11-2023, 03:20 PM
jimjamuser jimjamuser is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 9,893
Thanks: 6,893
Thanked 2,245 Times in 1,812 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoastDawg View Post
I think we can safely assume that the Chinese have technology every bit as good as anything the West can muster.
I would disagree, the Chinese don't even have nuclear subs. And if we made our own cell phones and other stuff, they could never keep up with the US. The only technology they have is what they have STOLEN from us by making our stuff.
  #29  
Old 02-11-2023, 03:28 PM
jimjamuser jimjamuser is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 9,893
Thanks: 6,893
Thanked 2,245 Times in 1,812 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thelegges View Post
Maybe it was Amazon delivering a package bet that customer is going to be unhappy. Or that eBay someone bought coming from China, no wonder it takes so long to deliver if they are using balloons.
I think that the US shot down the Batplane. Batman was showing Catwoman the northern lights up close. And just think maybe in nine months Gotham City could have had a new baby Robin.
  #30  
Old 02-11-2023, 04:06 PM
NoMoSno NoMoSno is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,339
Thanks: 189
Thanked 367 Times in 230 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimjamuser View Post
I would disagree, the Chinese don't even have nuclear subs. And if we made our own cell phones and other stuff, they could never keep up with the US. The only technology they have is what they have STOLEN from us by making our stuff.
China has 6 long range nuclear subs:
China has put longer-range ICBMs on its nuclear subs, U.S. says | The Japan Times
Closed Thread

Tags
high, altitude, object, shot, alaskan


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 AM.