Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael 61
(Post 2256670)
This thread is very telling - there are a few here that are extremely “passionate” in their defense of STRs, probably more passionate about defending STRs than any other topic they have ever posted. Why is that? Several posts back, I said it appears they themselves are landlords of STRs, so they have “skin” in the game. When I asked those that are STR landlords to come clean and admit it , I get “crickets”. Are they ashamed to admit they are STR landlords? Refusing to come clean and answer this question, is “dishonest” to me. I think most readers of this thread know who the STR landlords are on this thread, as their refusal to answer this simple question, speaks volumes. It’s apparent that vast majority of Villagers do not support STRs - in my outings at restaurants, clubs, social events, recreation activities, no one speaks favorably about them, and no one wants to live any place near one. The few proponents here represent a very tiny minority in favor.
|
Since I am one of the few on here who has not jumped on the bandwagon with both feet, and you are not comfortable stating that you believe I am an STR owner and I am one who passionately supports STRs, I will just assume it was directed at me and a couple of others.
1. I am not nor have I ever been a STR owner.
2. I am not passionately or to any lesser degree a supporter of short term rentals. This issue is not really even on my radar for important things in my life. I have stated in one of my posts that I am ambivalent on STRs. I recognized that people are having issues with them and I think that those things are wrong and I sympathize them, but I listed that my sister has been an STR renter once a year and is as conscientious as any owner, and I would hate for her to lose that opportunity.
3. If you look at my posts across multipe threads [I know, why would anyone even take the time to do that when there are so many more worthwhile things to do with your time, but if you (general you, not you specifically) are going to impugn people with the title of bully, STR owner, or anything else, you should probably base it on reality], you will see a common theme:
1. I am (passionately) against blanket statements that malign or undermine an entire profession based upon a small body of personal experience
2. I am (passionately) against people stating that because they are a supposed or actual expert on a topic, no on should question them on any remotely related topic
3. I am (extremely passionately in some cases, but not at all with STRs) against preventing anyone from owning/possessing things especially those protected by the constitution or using them in certain ways, because some other people use them illegally or extremely inconsiderately.
4. I am against people stating as fact that which is not fact
5. I am against people advocating a position by greatly exaggerating the frequency of the problem.
6. I am against people attributing statements, positions, feeling, etc to someone without any actual basis, and then attacking or criticizing them for that made up attribution.
7. I don't pick on spelling or grammar.
I am open to listen to anyone who is for any of those things that I am against. I willingly admit when I am wrong, but that doesn't happen often because I try to state as opinion that which is opinion, I try not to exaggerate the truth, I actually read the post to which I am responding and do not attribute things that weren't stated or clearly implied.
So, I don't take any offense to posts that impugn me because I know that it is not based on me being wrong, me being "mean", or whatever accusation. And I do not apologise for being against any of the things I listed. Please "come clean" if you are for any of them. And feel free to find any post that something I said was not correct (and haven't already admitted to that). I am more than willing to take what I dish out.