Proposal to help control health care costs: Proposal to help control health care costs: - Page 2 - Talk of The Villages Florida

Proposal to help control health care costs:

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 09-08-2014, 10:36 PM
KayakerNC's Avatar
KayakerNC KayakerNC is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnyatlast View Post
[I]
Really?
The Mayo Clinic stopped accepting Medicare at its five-physician practice in Glendale, Ariz., two years ago. Officials said at the time they would analyze financial results of the move early this year.
Really indeed. You are being exceedingly misleading.
"Mayo Clinic follows an established fee schedule based on the federal guidelines for Medicare patients, which allows health care organizations to charge up to 15 percent above the Medicare allowable fee. You're financially responsible for the portion above the Medicare allowable amount."

Medicare information for Mayo Clinic in Arizona - Arizona Patient and Visitor Guide - Mayo Clinic
__________________
KayakerNC
Mt Clemens, MI
Newport, NC
Suffering from TV envy
  #17  
Old 09-08-2014, 10:48 PM
CFrance's Avatar
CFrance CFrance is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tamarind Grove/Monpazier, France
Posts: 14,705
Thanks: 390
Thanked 2,132 Times in 877 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoriAnn View Post
Education and healthy lifestyle has never stopped one person from ultimately dying. The majority of healthcare spending for any person is during the last 2 years of their life when they are at the end of the disease process that will eventually end their life. Mortality is still 100% and treatment of the dying is expensive even if it's only palliative. The expense will not be impacted just by switching the burden to the state level. Medicare has been the most efficient health care delivery system in the world. Quick payment for service providers and nearly immediate approval for services for Patients. The problem is private insurance. Take a look at the profit of the 10 largest private insurance providers. WellPoint had a profit of 38%. Anthem was higher! If Medicare received all the premiums that the top 10 insurance providers enjoyed, the system would be the most stable in the world. No one should make profit from administrating insurance coverage. The only profit should be at the provider level. Go to a single payor system with Medicare and wipe out the insurance companies profits and the cost of healthcare would be instantly manageable.
I totally agree with you. All of it.
__________________
It's harder to hate close up.
  #18  
Old 09-08-2014, 11:16 PM
Barefoot's Avatar
Barefoot Barefoot is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winters in TV, Summers in Canada.
Posts: 17,657
Thanks: 1,692
Thanked 245 Times in 186 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tcxr750 View Post
I would be interested in a more detailed response on the Health Care system in Canada.
There are a lot of misconceptions about the Canadian Health Care System.
I find the US System confusing .. "free" health care seems to involve some type of monthly charge?
In Canada, we don't have any monthly fees to pay.
I have my choice of doctors. I can a specialist with a referral from my family doctor.
In Emergency Rooms, as in the USA, the critically ill are seen first. Others must wait their turn.
I've heard you have to wait four years for elective surgery. Not true.
Last year I had a knee replacement, without any cost to me.
Recently I had cataract surgery without any cost to me, other than I chose an upgraded lens.
Dental is not covered. Drugs are covered after the age of 65.

I'd be happy to answer any questions you have.
__________________
Barefoot At Last
No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Saving one dog will not change the world, but surely for that one dog, the world will change forever.
  #19  
Old 09-08-2014, 11:36 PM
Tennisnut Tennisnut is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 391
Thanks: 15
Thanked 68 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnyatlast View Post
"In the United States, the vendors such as Physicians, Hospitals, Clinics, Home Health, DME will always be privatized which gives incentive for more vendors to enter the market. The more eligible Patients, the more vendors eager to provide the care."

Really?

The Mayo Clinic stopped accepting Medicare at its five-physician practice in Glendale, Ariz., two years ago. Officials said at the time they would analyze financial results of the move early this year.

No results yet. Mayo spokesman James McVeigh said in an e-mail: “Our plan is to continue to study the program, collect data and review the impact on our patients.”

Mayo officials, who were unavailable at deadline, need more time to analyze how the Arizona clinic's decision to drop Medicare affected its finances, patient satisfaction and the overall number of patients, he said.

Mayo officials faulted Medicare for the move when they first announced plans to stop accepting the insurance.

“Mayo Clinic in Arizona loses a substantial amount of money every year due to the reimbursement schedule under Medicare, a loss we cannot continue to sustain,” the health system said on its news blog. “The discrepancy between what Medicare pays and our cost of providing services is particularly acute for our primary-care practices.”

Mayo also told the Bloomberg news service the clinic's finances would be examined under the pilot “to see if it could have implications beyond Arizona.”

Mayo Clinic operates in Arizona, Iowa, Florida, Minnesota and Wisconsin."
Mayo vs. Medicare: an update | Of Interest, the healthcare finance blog by Modern Healthcare's Melanie Evans

SO. Medicare payments less than the costs of providing the care is going to "incentivize more vendors to enter the market"??

Why? So they can go bankrupt and be unable to pay themselves and their employees who need jobs?
Sounds like the Mayo clinic needs to implement some cost controls since other facilities can provide services under the MediCare fee schedule. I know for example, a MRI can run from $1500 to $5000. Why is there that much variation in cost?
  #20  
Old 09-09-2014, 08:08 AM
gomoho's Avatar
gomoho gomoho is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

My biggest concern with Medicare is FRAUD - seems to run rampant in the government run program - not so much in private insurance - maybe that's why private companies make a profit!
  #21  
Old 09-09-2014, 08:14 AM
tcxr750 tcxr750 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Cleveland Suburb
Posts: 498
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

It seems the issue here in the USA is who pays for what and how much through our taxes. In Canada you may be paying more taxes but perhaps it is more efficiently spent.Why do Canadians not seem upset with their healthcare system and the government that provides it?
  #22  
Old 09-09-2014, 08:22 AM
Chi-Town's Avatar
Chi-Town Chi-Town is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,506
Thanks: 192
Thanked 1,484 Times in 717 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tedquick View Post

Remember a few years ago when a politician thought that Exxon’s $40 billion profits were obscene and should be turned over to the government for redistribution? What was never mentioned was that Exxon had paid over 110 billion dollars in taxes that same year or nearly 3 times as much as they made in profit, but that important fact was ignored. That was politics and it was dirty because it misled those who were unaware.
Don't quite remember this exactly. Perhaps some documentation would help. Thanks.
  #23  
Old 09-09-2014, 08:31 AM
CFrance's Avatar
CFrance CFrance is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tamarind Grove/Monpazier, France
Posts: 14,705
Thanks: 390
Thanked 2,132 Times in 877 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=gomoho;935302]My biggest concern with Medicare is FRAUD - seems to run rampant in the government run program - not so much in private insurance - maybe that's why private companies make a profit![/QUOTE
The fraud comes from the doctors and the hospitals and is perpetrated on the insurance companies.

In any case, I don't agree that fraud should bring Medicare down in favor of privatizing insurance, who were denying coverage to people who needed it the most, or making it so expensive they couldn't afford it. Every year private insurance rates hike.

Anybody with a pre-existing condition is happy to have Medicare.
__________________
It's harder to hate close up.
  #24  
Old 09-09-2014, 08:45 AM
allus70 allus70 is offline
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 84
Thanks: 60
Thanked 39 Times in 13 Posts
Default How Do They Do It?

The French have one of the most advanced, extensive and overall best health care systems in the world. Complete coverage is available to every French citizen.
Yet, if healthcare costs per procedure here in the US were the same as those in France, we would currently be currently enjoying a budget surplus.

In Need of a New Hip, but Priced Out of the U.S.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/04/he...anted=all&_r=0
  #25  
Old 09-09-2014, 08:57 AM
tedquick's Avatar
tedquick tedquick is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 930
Thanks: 431
Thanked 197 Times in 107 Posts
Default Here ya go!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Town View Post
Don't quite remember this exactly. Perhaps some documentation would help. Thanks.
BTW, congrats on an even 600 posts!!

Taken from a 2/2/07 article --

Yesterday Exxon declared the biggest profit in the entire history of capitalism — $39 billion — and that did not escape Hillary's notice. Today she promised to tax Exxon on those huge profits, and tax those greedy capitalist pigs big time. Here's her quote:

"I want to take those profits and put them into an alternative energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy alternatives that will actually begin to move us toward the direction of independence."

She referred to those profits as the highest in the history of the world, and she said: "I want to take those profits..." Not I want to take PART of those profits. "I want to take those profits," she said.
  #26  
Old 09-09-2014, 09:19 AM
buggyone's Avatar
buggyone buggyone is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tedquick View Post
BTW, congrats on an even 600 posts!!

Taken from a 2/2/07 article --

Yesterday Exxon declared the biggest profit in the entire history of capitalism — $39 billion — and that did not escape Hillary's notice. Today she promised to tax Exxon on those huge profits, and tax those greedy capitalist pigs big time. Here's her quote:

"I want to take those profits and put them into an alternative energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy alternatives that will actually begin to move us toward the direction of independence."

She referred to those profits as the highest in the history of the world, and she said: "I want to take those profits..." Not I want to take PART of those profits. "I want to take those profits," she said.
Great job of taking words out of context! Pass the salt shaker, please.
  #27  
Old 09-09-2014, 09:56 AM
Rags123 Rags123 is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 673
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buggyone View Post
Great job of taking words out of context! Pass the salt shaker, please.
Her complete statement IN CONTEXT...

"Exxon Mobil and other oil giants continue to run up record profits to maintain the status quo even as Americans struggle to pay the high costs of heating their homes, fueling their cars, and meeting the mounting challenges of a growing economic crisis. And too many in Washington have stood in the way of the changes we need to chart a new energy strategy for our nation that breaks our dependence on foreign oil, reduces global warming pollution, and creates millions of new green collar jobs. I have proposed that we eliminate the tax breaks for big oil companies like Exxon Mobil and use that money to establish a Strategic Energy Fund to speed development of clean energy technology, put more efficient cars on the road, create new jobs, and provide immediate energy relief for the middle class as we head into what could be a difficult winter.
"

Read more: Clinton Blasts Exxon Mobil's Record Profits | TheHill
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
  #28  
Old 09-09-2014, 10:55 AM
sunnyatlast sunnyatlast is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: The Villages, FL
Posts: 1,208
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KayakerNC View Post
Really indeed. You are being exceedingly misleading.
"Mayo Clinic follows an established fee schedule based on the federal guidelines for Medicare patients, which allows health care organizations to charge up to 15 percent above the Medicare allowable fee. You're financially responsible for the portion above the Medicare allowable amount."

Medicare information for Mayo Clinic in Arizona - Arizona Patient and Visitor Guide - Mayo Clinic
It wouldn't be "misleading" if one actually reads and considers the points in bold in my post, that Medicare pays less than costs of running the place. Mayo was reacting to that reality.

So here is a more current article on what major hospitals across the country are doing to compensate for that problem: buying physician practices and adding "hospital" "facilities fees" onto procedures and services done at 1/4 the cost in a private practice office.

The result of this and the higher deductibles new ACA policyholders have mean that people are choosing to not go to the dr. when they need to for routine care, because they cannot afford a former $150 charge at the office now being $400 because the same office is now "in a hospital", and they now have a $5,000 deductible to pay before getting any use out of their insurance.

As hospitals buy physician practices, costs rise, Medicare report finds | Tampa Bay Times
  #29  
Old 09-09-2014, 11:13 AM
buggyone's Avatar
buggyone buggyone is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Rags123;935363]Her complete statement IN CONTEXT...

"Exxon Mobil and other oil giants continue to run up record profits to maintain the status quo even as Americans struggle to pay the high costs of heating their homes, fueling their cars, and meeting the mounting challenges of a growing economic crisis. And too many in Washington have stood in the way of the changes we need to chart a new energy strategy for our nation that breaks our dependence on foreign oil, reduces global warming pollution, and creates millions of new green collar jobs. I have proposed that we eliminate the tax breaks for big oil companies like Exxon Mobil and use that money to establish a Strategic Energy Fund to speed development of clean energy technology, put more efficient cars on the road, create new jobs, and provide immediate energy relief for the middle class as we head into what could be a difficult winter.
"

Thank you for that good researching. Eliminating tax breaks for big oil is a lot different than "I want to take those profits" as a direct quote, isn't it? It also sounds like a very good idea when you think of the percentage of income tax they pay when compared with the percentage you and I pay.
  #30  
Old 09-09-2014, 11:21 AM
Villages PL Villages PL is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Belvedere
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueash View Post
You did not link to the article you reference, so I cannot see if you have actually explained what the original writer suggested.
Sorry, 1) I thought the heading of the article sounded too political 2) I'm not good at providing links unless the address is short and 3) I figured someone would recognize the issue and eventually provide a link.


If it might help the conversation stay focused, I'll provide the proper search phrase now so that someone can provide the link:

This is it: Democrats borrow a GOP idea in proposal to help control health care costs

Last edited by Villages PL; 09-09-2014 at 11:51 AM.
Closed Thread


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.