Social Security Retirees Could Face ,000 Cut Social Security Retirees Could Face $18,000 Cut - Page 6 - Talk of The Villages Florida

Social Security Retirees Could Face $18,000 Cut

Reply
Thread Tools
  #76  
Old 07-30-2025, 07:29 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 7,435
Thanks: 2,302
Thanked 7,778 Times in 3,059 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueblaze View Post
The solution is ridiculously simple, and there will eventually no other option -- start making the wealthy help pay off the debt owed to current retirees. SS is the only government program that the wealthy are excluded from by statute. The moment you hit "wealthy" (about $110K/year, last I checked), you quit having to pay for this boondoggle.

If folks like Elon and Zuck had to pay the same 15% of their lifetime earnings that we did, SS would run a surplus to the end of time. In fact, Zuck alone could cover the SS deficit for the next hundred years by himself, and still be a billionaire 100X over.

If we were a smart country, we would just calculate the amount needed to payoff the current retirees and reimburse the kids. Then we'd divide it up, tax EVERYONE to cover it, and just end the damned thing. With EVERYONE paying, it would be a trivial tax, compared to FICA. In its place, we would set up a privately-funded retirement program, and force everyone to INVEST the same 15% we had confiscated for a Ponzi scheme. Our kids would retire with an actual asset worth millions, instead of just a stupid promise that's forfeited the moment you die.

The only downside would be that the gooberment wouldn't have a slush fund to borrow from, like they have for the last 100 years. But now that they've just about blown through it, anyway, maybe we can finally convince our corrupt politicians to finally give Americans a real retirement system instead of a Ponzi scheme.

Of course, it only works if we retirees don't set our hair on fire the moment we see an ad with somebody pushing granny off a cliff.
A whole lot of words to explain that you don’t understand how the program works.

See some of the responses above:
- SS taxes during our working years do not cover what we will be paid in retirement
- investing the same amount in the market *might* earn enough to break even if there are no bad years
- SS payouts are capped just as taxable income is capped. If you want to tax more income then be prepared to pay more in benefits, then see the first item above
- The market is a similar “Ponzi” scheme as SS. Without new players to buy your shares your stock is worthless (see memecoins for an example)

SS is suffering from a lower worker to retiree ratio, longer lifespans, and now the new “no tax on SS” scam. The first is fixed by increasing taxes, the second by increasing the retirement age, and the third by ending the games.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
  #77  
Old 07-30-2025, 07:34 PM
biker1 biker1 is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,670
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1,254 Times in 721 Posts
Default

The SS cap is actually at $176,100, not $110K. The SS tax is actually 6.2% to the employee and 6.2% to the employer, plus Medicare is 1.45% to the employee and 1.45% to the employer (no cap on Medicare). If you are self-employed it is 15.3% total as you pay it all. The Social Security Trust Fund is over $2T and that will be totally consumed (funding the deficit) in the next 8 years. Zuckerberg doesn't have several trillion dollars. The rest of the stuff in your post, whatever ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueblaze View Post
The solution is ridiculously simple, and there will eventually no other option -- start making the wealthy help pay off the debt owed to current retirees. SS is the only government program that the wealthy are excluded from by statute. The moment you hit "wealthy" (about $110K/year, last I checked), you quit having to pay for this boondoggle.

If folks like Elon and Zuck had to pay the same 15% of their lifetime earnings that we did, SS would run a surplus to the end of time. In fact, Zuck alone could cover the SS deficit for the next hundred years by himself, and still be a billionaire 100X over.

If we were a smart country, we would just calculate the amount needed to payoff the current retirees and reimburse the kids. Then we'd divide it up, tax EVERYONE to cover it, and just end the damned thing. With EVERYONE paying, it would be a trivial tax, compared to FICA. In its place, we would set up a privately-funded retirement program, and force everyone to INVEST the same 15% we had confiscated for a Ponzi scheme. Our kids would retire with an actual asset worth millions, instead of just a stupid promise that's forfeited the moment you die.

The only downside would be that the gooberment wouldn't have a slush fund to borrow from, like they have for the last 100 years. But now that they've just about blown through it, anyway, maybe we can finally convince our corrupt politicians to finally give Americans a real retirement system instead of a Ponzi scheme.

Of course, it only works if we retirees don't set our hair on fire the moment we see an ad with somebody pushing granny off a cliff.

Last edited by biker1; 07-30-2025 at 07:48 PM.
  #78  
Old 07-30-2025, 08:19 PM
BrianL99 BrianL99 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 3,567
Thanks: 298
Thanked 3,463 Times in 1,371 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueblaze View Post
The solution is ridiculously simple, and there will eventually no other option -- start making the wealthy help pay off the debt owed to current retirees. SS is the only government program that the wealthy are excluded from by statute. The moment you hit "wealthy" (about $110K/year, last I checked), you quit having to pay for this boondoggle.

.
$110,000/year is "wealthy" ? In what universe is that?

& the number where you stop paying for Social Security, is $176,100/year.
__________________
"God made me and gave me the right to remain silent, but not the ability." Sen John Kennedy (R-La)
" ... and that Norm, is why some folks always feel smarter, when they sign onto TOTV after a few beers" adapted from Cliff Claven, 1/18/90
  #79  
Old 07-30-2025, 08:30 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 7,435
Thanks: 2,302
Thanked 7,778 Times in 3,059 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
$110,000/year is "wealthy" ? In what universe is that?

& the number where you stop paying for Social Security, is $176,100/year.
He did say that was the value the last time he checked. Perhaps before commenting he should have come up to speed on the changes since 2012.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
  #80  
Old 07-30-2025, 10:21 PM
PilotAlan PilotAlan is offline
Member
Join Date: Jan 2025
Posts: 59
Thanks: 3
Thanked 54 Times in 24 Posts
Default

The market has never gone to zero, or anything close to it. If it ever did, every form of retirement would be gone (including Social Security), because the government and country are bankrupt. Yes, a recession can hurt you, but you're ignoring the decades of good rates of return before and after.

The rate of return on the Dow Jones has provided the best rate of return over any 40 year period for any investment anywhere, ever. Including the 40 years with the Great Depression in the middle of it.

Even a relatively low income worker, if that 16% of their income was invested in market-tracking mutual funds, would be a multi millionaire by their 60s.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aces4 View Post
And one big blip in the market and all that money is gone in an instant. Nothing like everyone sitting at the craps table for retirement benefits.
  #81  
Old 07-31-2025, 05:11 AM
Rainger99 Rainger99 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 2,782
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2,105 Times in 984 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PilotAlan View Post
Even a relatively low income worker, if that 16% of their income was invested in market-tracking mutual funds, would be a multi millionaire by their 60s.
If you allowed workers to invest 16% for 40-45 years, how do you fund social security during that 40-45 years?

Currently, What you pay into the system does not go into an account for your retirement.

Instead, the money we paid was used for Social Security payments for people that were retired at the time - our parents, aunts, and uncles. That reduced the burden of having to support our parents and pay for their medical treatment.

Our benefits are paid for by younger workers.

Last edited by Rainger99; 07-31-2025 at 10:09 AM.
  #82  
Old 07-31-2025, 05:57 AM
jayteadunn jayteadunn is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 27
Thanks: 34
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Create more jobs, pay more people, collect more social security taxes. Work requirements for healthy able bodied people receiving assistance benefits pre-retirement will also create more social security taxes. Remember for every dollar someone earns in America up to $176,100 earns the government 6.2 cents from the employee and 6.2 cents from the employer totaling 12.4 cents. Self employed people pay the whole 12.4 cents per dollar themselves. That is a lot of money.
  #83  
Old 07-31-2025, 06:24 AM
Cliff Fr Cliff Fr is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 436
Thanks: 267
Thanked 274 Times in 160 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GATORBILL66 View Post
The retirement age needs to be raised by 5 years in steps over the next ten years to save social security.
Would you have the age increase apply to workers doing manual labor?
  #84  
Old 07-31-2025, 06:38 AM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 7,435
Thanks: 2,302
Thanked 7,778 Times in 3,059 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PilotAlan View Post
The market has never gone to zero, or anything close to it. If it ever did, every form of retirement would be gone (including Social Security), because the government and country are bankrupt. Yes, a recession can hurt you, but you're ignoring the decades of good rates of return before and after.

The rate of return on the Dow Jones has provided the best rate of return over any 40 year period for any investment anywhere, ever. Including the 40 years with the Great Depression in the middle of it.

Even a relatively low income worker, if that 16% of their income was invested in market-tracking mutual funds, would be a multi millionaire by their 60s.
Only 15.3% and that was only recently.

The amount of income taxed is capped. Cap was $110,000 in 2012 and $176,000 this year.

An individual who retired with an above average salary would have achieved just under $1M, not multi-millions.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
  #85  
Old 07-31-2025, 07:31 AM
jimhoward jimhoward is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2024
Posts: 379
Thanks: 25
Thanked 354 Times in 174 Posts
Default

If a percent of workers salary and an employer match are to be invested in the stock market and the resulting nest egg earmarked specifically for them, as some have suggested, why have a SSI program at all? Workers could just do that themselves. That is what a 401k does.

Despite complaints from those who have done the math and figured out they would have done better investing on their own, social security remains one of the most successful and popular government programs in history.
  #86  
Old 07-31-2025, 08:56 AM
MollyJo MollyJo is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 157
Thanks: 1,554
Thanked 109 Times in 59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRcorvette View Post
They need to let younger people put their money into a secure group of Mutual funds so that it will grow to a nice retirement amount. Anytime the government controls things it will not turn out well. They have raided the SS fund many times and used it for other pet projects. Eventually it will dry up. We have way too many government give away programs as it is right now.
The SS fund has NEVER been raided for ‘Pet Projects’ Our SS checks are paid by current workers, and any shortage comes from the SS Trust Fund created decades ago in anticipation of shortages due to less children born. The Trust Fund will run out approximately 2033-2034 unless Congress votes to Smash The Cap, currently $176,100 for higher earners. All administrations have done nothing to assure SS remains intact for the future. Politicians want to give SS to Wall Street to invest in stocks=disaster
Call your elected officials to demand they support SS by keeping employees available to help recipients when calling or visiting SS offices.
I found Dr Ed Weir on Utube, he ran the 3rd busiest SS office in the country until he retired. Now, Dr Weir does Utube podcasts daily to help all of us with the latest changes & answers questions WE call or write in. He debunks all the myths. He has his own web page that people can search
mygovexpert.com
He has also partnered with a company I can’t recall at the moment, that will assist you with choosing the best Medicare plan suited to your needs(any state) all for free. Listen to Dr Ed Weir’s Utube videos & you can learn of his vast knowledge on all SS claims & Medicare partnership. It’s all free.
  #87  
Old 07-31-2025, 09:29 AM
biker1 biker1 is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,670
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1,254 Times in 721 Posts
Default

Not exactly. The Trust Fund is the manifestation of the collection of SS taxes in excess of benefits paid. Ideally, the SS tax would be adjusted annually to exactly match benefits paid. By collecting excess SS tax and funneling that money into the general fund (where it was spent paying Government bills) and then issuing IOUs to the SSA for those funds, all they guaranteed was that money would need to be borrowed from global markets to pay benefits when (in the future, which is actually now) they exceed SS taxes collected (pay back the IOUs). Raising the cap on earnings that are subject to SS tax will, by itself, not fix the problem. It will only delay the date when the Trust Fund is exhausted (all IOUs have been paid back by borrowing money from global markets) and benefits are reduced since there is no law to allow SS to pay benefits in excess of what they collect via SS taxes or cashing in of Trust Fund IOUs. Other actions need to be taken.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MollyJo View Post
The SS fund has NEVER been raided for ‘Pet Projects’ Our SS checks are paid by current workers, and any shortage comes from the SS Trust Fund created decades ago in anticipation of shortages due to less children born. The Trust Fund will run out approximately 2033-2034 unless Congress votes to Smash The Cap, currently $176,100 for higher earners. All administrations have done nothing to assure SS remains intact for the future. Politicians want to give SS to Wall Street to invest in stocks=disaster
Call your elected officials to demand they support SS by keeping employees available to help recipients when calling or visiting SS offices.
I found Dr Ed Weir on Utube, he ran the 3rd busiest SS office in the country until he retired. Now, Dr Weir does Utube podcasts daily to help all of us with the latest changes & answers questions WE call or write in. He debunks all the myths. He has his own web page that people can search
mygovexpert.com
He has also partnered with a company I can’t recall at the moment, that will assist you with choosing the best Medicare plan suited to your needs(any state) all for free. Listen to Dr Ed Weir’s Utube videos & you can learn of his vast knowledge on all SS claims & Medicare partnership. It’s all free.

Last edited by biker1; 07-31-2025 at 09:34 AM.
  #88  
Old 07-31-2025, 09:37 AM
Caymus Caymus is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,278
Thanks: 22
Thanked 1,148 Times in 568 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MollyJo View Post
The SS fund has NEVER been raided for ‘Pet Projects’ Our SS checks are paid by current workers, and any shortage comes from the SS Trust Fund created decades ago in anticipation of shortages due to less children born. The Trust Fund will run out approximately 2033-2034 unless Congress votes to Smash The Cap, currently $176,100 for higher earners. All administrations have done nothing to assure SS remains intact for the future. Politicians want to give SS to Wall Street to invest in stocks=disaster
Call your elected officials to demand they support SS by keeping employees available to help recipients when calling or visiting SS offices.
I found Dr Ed Weir on Utube, he ran the 3rd busiest SS office in the country until he retired. Now, Dr Weir does Utube podcasts daily to help all of us with the latest changes & answers questions WE call or write in. He debunks all the myths. He has his own web page that people can search
mygovexpert.com
He has also partnered with a company I can’t recall at the moment, that will assist you with choosing the best Medicare plan suited to your needs(any state) all for free. Listen to Dr Ed Weir’s Utube videos & you can learn of his vast knowledge on all SS claims & Medicare partnership. It’s all free.
The fund has been raided. There is no Lock-Box.
  #89  
Old 07-31-2025, 09:57 AM
Rainger99 Rainger99 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 2,782
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2,105 Times in 984 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
$110,000/year is "wealthy" ? In what universe is that?
The average income in the USA is about $60,000 to $65,000. To a person making the average income, $110,000 looks wealthy.
  #90  
Old 07-31-2025, 10:00 AM
Blueblaze Blueblaze is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 716
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1,304 Times in 380 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by biker1 View Post
The SS cap is actually at $176,100, not $110K. The SS tax is actually 6.2% to the employee and 6.2% to the employer, plus Medicare is 1.45% to the employee and 1.45% to the employer (no cap on Medicare). If you are self-employed it is 15.3% total as you pay it all. The Social Security Trust Fund is over $2T and that will be totally consumed (funding the deficit) in the next 8 years. Zuckerberg doesn't have several trillion dollars. The rest of the stuff in your post, whatever ...
OK, I can pick nits, too.

I already said that I hadn't recently checked the cap. OK, it's now $176K. So, what? What does that have to do with my point THAT THE RICH DON'T PAY? By the gooberment's own definition, you aren't rich until you hit that cap.

Yes, the employer picks up half of the 15% -- which they, of course, simply deduct from your wages. It's still 15% or your life that you could have used to save for your own retirement (and pass on to your kids!) THAT THE RICH DON'T PAY.

The entire point you ignored with your childish "whatever" response, is that SS is a literal broken Ponzi scheme that can easily be fixed without hurting anyone. We simply need to open our minds and eyes to the fact that, whatever you want to call it, it's a government debt which we have let the rich off the hook from paying for the past 100 years.
Reply

Tags
problems, major, create, happen, social


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 AM.