States with highest death rate per 100k States with highest death rate per 100k - Page 2 - Talk of The Villages Florida

States with highest death rate per 100k

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 04-19-2020, 04:25 PM
manaboutown manaboutown is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NJ, NM, SC, PA, DC, MD, VA, NY, CA, ID and finally FL.
Posts: 7,870
Thanks: 14,321
Thanked 5,108 Times in 1,955 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdNoMore View Post
Golfing in ABQ (Land of entrapment).
Arroyo Del Oso, a public course in the NE Heights. Back in the mid 1970s I lived in a house on the eastern edge of that course.
__________________
"No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth." Plato

“To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.” Thomas Paine
  #17  
Old 04-19-2020, 04:37 PM
ficoguy ficoguy is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: PINE RIDGE
Posts: 360
Thanks: 43
Thanked 379 Times in 169 Posts
Default

New Jersey is biting the dust because they were afraid to limit interaction in 2 large religiously populated communities - Lakewood and Teaneck.
  #18  
Old 04-19-2020, 04:38 PM
ficoguy ficoguy is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: PINE RIDGE
Posts: 360
Thanks: 43
Thanked 379 Times in 169 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet View Post
So then the governors of Arkansas etc are doing the best job ever!

I think that some governors were facing much more challenging circumstances than others.
And some were afraid (NJ) to clamp down on densely populated close quarters living highly interactive religious communities
  #19  
Old 04-19-2020, 04:42 PM
Altavia Altavia is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 4,588
Thanks: 1,935
Thanked 3,521 Times in 1,687 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by manaboutown View Post
Since I grew up in New Mexico and still have business interests and friends there I am following the Wuhan virus in that state. The urban Albuquerque area has the most cases. Nine assisted living facilities located around the state contain significant percentages of infected residents and employees. The rural counties are all but untouched. What that tells me is that the density of a population has a lot to do with the chance of becoming infected.

Also population centers having high percentages of people who travel for business and personal reasons have relatively high infection rates.
And people who work/spend time in buildings/facilities where the air is recirculated and shared. Elevators are a likely hot spot.
  #20  
Old 04-19-2020, 05:48 PM
GoodLife's Avatar
GoodLife GoodLife is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,755
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2,950 Times in 829 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by queasy27 View Post
Using the OP's logic, I suppose it stands to reason that the country with the highest number of infections indicates how well that country's administration has handled the crisis.
That's a valid question which we can explore by looking at the data. I look at confirmed deaths per million inhabitants for comparison.

Belgium 470
Spain 428
Italy 384
France 296
United Kingdom 227
Netherlands 210
Sweden 149
USA 117

China data is a joke, it's estimated that 40,000 died in Wuhan alone.

Confirmed COVID-19 deaths per million people - Our World in Data

So we're doing better than a lot of advanced western societies with similar levels of international travel visitors.. We know the virus spread from China via air travel, so you can also look at that data.

Countries with highest tourism per year.

France 89 million
Spain 83
USA 80
China 63
Italy 62

The World's Most Visited Countries - WorldAtlas.com

We can drop China from the list as the virus originated and spread from there. So it's no wonder that the countries hardest hit are also the most visited. Too bad China did not shut down Wuhan until after 7 million got the heck out of dodge and spread the virus all over the world.

How the Virus Got Out - The New York Times

how the virus spread nyt - Bing video

Last edited by GoodLife; 04-19-2020 at 06:09 PM.
  #21  
Old 04-19-2020, 06:03 PM
GoodLife's Avatar
GoodLife GoodLife is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,755
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2,950 Times in 829 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdNoMore View Post
I can't help but wonder if we hadn't pretty much wasted the whole month of February, in getting ready at the national level...would we still be leading the world in cases?
Perhaps the administration was getting some inaccurate advice.

Top disease official: Risk of coronavirus in USA is '''minuscule'''; skip mask and wash hands

Virus Experts' Early Statements Belie 'Prescient' Portrayal | RealClearPolitics
  #22  
Old 04-19-2020, 08:49 PM
queasy27 queasy27 is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 866
Thanks: 457
Thanked 326 Times in 142 Posts
Default

As an exercise, I compared each state's population density against their total number of confirmed cases. Probably not surprising that there's a correlation between more people per sq mile and a greater number of cases.

States that have high density populations primarily in their big cities have more of a disparity in rankings -- for example, NY is #8 in overall density but #1 in number of cases. The biggest outlier is D.C. with the highest population density but #32 in number of cases.

The Delta column indicates the difference in ranking between population density and number of cases.

I uploaded to Google Drive since Excel attachments aren't allowed here.
  #23  
Old 04-19-2020, 09:43 PM
skyking skyking is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 484
Thanks: 53
Thanked 285 Times in 112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by queasy27 View Post
Using the OP's logic, I suppose it stands to reason that the country with the highest number of infections indicates how well that country's administration has handled the crisis.
Per capita. The larger the population the higher the number of infections. Get it?
  #24  
Old 04-19-2020, 10:56 PM
Topspinmo's Avatar
Topspinmo Topspinmo is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 15,245
Thanks: 7,659
Thanked 6,297 Times in 3,256 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdNoMore View Post
I can't help but wonder if we hadn't pretty much wasted the whole month of February, in getting ready at the national level...would we still be leading the world in cases?
maybe 375 million and more traveled all over the world in January, February, and March has something to do with it infecting hundreds of thousands along the way?
  #25  
Old 04-20-2020, 01:45 AM
queasy27 queasy27 is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 866
Thanks: 457
Thanked 326 Times in 142 Posts
Default

As an indicator of how successful countries have been at controlling the spread, here's a chart from April 9 that shows the number of confirmed infections per 1M in population. Only countries with over 4M population and more than 2K cases were included.

Spain: 3192
Switzerland: 2,734
Italy: 2,307
Belgium: 2,049
Austria: 1,463
Germany: 1,366
United States: 1,321
Portugal: 1,278
Ireland: 1,251
France: 1,240
Netherlands: 1,200
Norway: 1,137

Standard disclaimer from Statista: "The number of actual cases in a country is going to be higher than official figures show, with testing rates also varying dramatically. As with all figures relating to confirmed cases, they should be treated with caution."
  #26  
Old 04-20-2020, 04:52 AM
allus70 allus70 is offline
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 84
Thanks: 60
Thanked 39 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Yes, but there are 3 airports in the NYC Metro area, it is also the financial & media of the US. In addition, NYC has one of the largest rapid transit system in the world with 5.7 million riders utilizing it daily.
  #27  
Old 04-20-2020, 05:05 AM
Chatbrat Chatbrat is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,410
Thanks: 0
Thanked 987 Times in 384 Posts
Default

In NJ a lot of deaths are in nursing homes, they are equal to a land locked cruise ship, disease distribution centers
  #28  
Old 04-20-2020, 05:20 AM
MarkGoldberg MarkGoldberg is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 51 Times in 9 Posts
Default

I don’t think the purpose was to compare how effectively each state is handling the crisis. It is only to state the relative number of deaths.
  #29  
Old 04-20-2020, 05:37 AM
dougjb dougjb is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 261
Thanks: 93
Thanked 431 Times in 139 Posts
Default

If we are to judge how well Governors are handling the situation based on infections, perhaps we should do the same for national leaders. So, which country has the highest incidence rate?

The USA of course, by far. Does that mean our national leadership has failed us?
  #30  
Old 04-20-2020, 06:24 AM
biker1 biker1 is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,664
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1,251 Times in 719 Posts
Default

We don't which country has the highest incident rate. We do know which country has the highest reported incident rate. They are not the same and we may never know the real answer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougjb View Post
If we are to judge how well Governors are handling the situation based on infections, perhaps we should do the same for national leaders. So, which country has the highest incidence rate?

The USA of course, by far. Does that mean our national leadership has failed us?
Closed Thread

Tags
100k, deaths, states, population, jersey


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 AM.