Progressive linguistic constructivism, MSM and a spot light three of the tools in a progressive's propaganda utility pack. Meantime they continue in all areas to misbehave in the shadows.

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by RubiTHECon

Progressive linguistic constructivism, MSM and a spot light three of the tools in a progressive's propaganda utility pack. Meantime they continue in all areas to misbehave in the shadows.

Personal Best Regards:

You've outdone yourself this time.

Your gibberish doesn't even rise to the already low bar you've previously set...of pseudo-intellectualism.

Good job.



Deepest Sincere Wishes:

Originally Posted by Guest

Progressive linguistic constructivism, MSM and a spot light three of the tools in a progressive's propaganda utility pack. Meantime they continue in all areas to misbehave in the shadows.

Personal Best Regards:

Gibberish

Originally Posted by ICKY

While Obama probably should have, he would have then been viciously attacked...as trying to manipulate the election.

Comey's action one week before the election, albeit possibly benign in intent...had exactly that effect.

By Obama taking the high road however...America is certainly now traveling the low road.



Deepest Sincere Wishes:

So Obama took the high road?

SO, if Obama saw a law or treason being perpetrated and did not report it, then he would have-IS an accessory to or after the fact. Obama has therefore committed a crime. If Obama spied on an American, then he broke the law if he used the NSA or the CIA. Only the FBI may "spy" on Americans. Intelligence agencies are restricted by law from spying in America or on Americans.

So, either the information that Obama had on Trump was illegally obtained and non-criminal or illegally obtained criminal which makes Obama culpable in the crime. Either way, Obama may be involved in criminal activity. But, Trump may NOT be involved in anything criminal. No one knows until the information is revealed. IF it can be revealed. The information may be classified and not releasable to the public.

It really doesn't matter because Hillary got away with committing felonies and no one cares in D.C. I imagine that fair play means that if anything untoward involving Trump or his team is found, then he should receive the same professional courtesy. A complete pass like Hillary received for all her felonies. All of them worse than anything Trump could have been involved in BEFORE he was in office.

Originally Posted by Guest

Seriously?

Go back and read my post again, slowly this time (you can move your lips if necessary)...and then tell us how Obama is involved with this investigation.



Deepest Sincere Wishes:

FBI Director James Comey wanted to go public (in June or July) with information about alleged Russian attempts to influence the 2016 election but was blocked by the Obama administration, according to a report.

Originally Posted by Guest

FBI Director James Comey wanted to go public (in June or July) with information about alleged Russian attempts to influence the 2016 election but was blocked by the Obama administration, according to a report.

What "report?"

Link?

Post 8

Originally Posted by Guest

Post 8

But many in the room didn’t like the idea, and White House officials thought the announcement should be a coordinated message backed by multiple agencies, the source says. “An op-ed doesn’t have the same stature. It comes from one person.”

A wise decision, perfectly exemplifying the difference between professional adults...and the middle-schoolers running the White House now.




"The house is on fire, Trump is running around with a box of matches, and the GOP demands to know who called the fire department." ... Garry Kasparov

Deepest Sincere Wishes:

Originally Posted by Guest

"The house is on fire, Trump is running around with a box of matches, and the GOP demands to know who called the fire department." ... Garry Kasparov

The Russian who was the first world chess champion to lose a match to a computer under standard time controls?
You choice of people to quote is, at this time in history, amusing, ironic, boggling, and immaterial.

Originally Posted by Guest

The Russian who was the first world chess champion to lose a match to a computer under standard time controls?
You choice of people to quote is, at this time in history, amusing, ironic, boggling, and immaterial.

Your tacit, albeit reluctant, admission that Kasparov's description of the truth is perfect and struck bone...is much appreciated.

Thanks.



Deepest Sincere Wishes: