Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Do you ever read newspapers ? Do you ever read magazines ? Do you watch any news broadcasts at all ? On what planet are you getting your information. The WH is very concerned.....she violated, at minimum, the 2009 government regulation, she has lied so much on this, as recently as yesterday. Pundits ON BOTH SIDES are calling her a liar, et. etc. When such staunch Democrats as Chris Matthews and writer Eugene Robinson are saying such things, what the heck do you know that they do not ? Most Democrats know she is lying, and yet you want her as President. I am not sure what your sources are to make such statements. If you want proof, just read the news, READ...it will cleanse your soul |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hillary Clinton has been targeted by partisan investigations since 1992. And she still walks free. End of story (at least for me).
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Forget the partisan part because there are several within her own party that are beginning to question what they are being made privy to at their level. One has to be very careful when either of the Clintons, both lawyers, state they have done nothing illegal. That statement does not mean they have not done anything wrong. As an example Bill can say he done nothing wrong as there is no law on the books to state it is illegal to play with the help in the oval office....hence he did nothing illegal. Ditto goes for ANYTHING the other Clinton claims to have done nothing illegal. They are trained to use, abuse and hide behind the law whichever makes their case.........GUILTY OR NOT!!! |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, she wipes the gun clean of her fingerprints and that makes her trustworthy to you? Just wondering what kind of voter she attracts.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's convenient to be a rich lawyer when suspected of a felony.
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The current investigations are hardly partisan (FBI and Justice).
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bee-eye-en-gee-oh!
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And even then, there is the smell of Obama influence. Not exactly leaning to the right.
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillar...il_controversy
As Democrats what are we supposed to do about this? If there is concrete evidence and the FBI or whoever makes charges against her she will probably have to give up on her campaign. That does not mean she is guilty. A jury or plea bargain determines that. I have not found Donald Trump to be honest about much of anything but so many Republicans praise him for telling it like it is. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I see your concern and share it. From my perspective, after hearing all the moral high ground being taken by the Democratic party on EVERY ISSUE, not just a couple, but ALL OF THEM, it seems to me to be the most hypocritical choice that could have been made. Forget for a minute whether she has charges filed against her. As I said in the OP, I am not accusing her of anything illegal. BUT... She has lied and that has been documented on this email story. She did violate a number of regulations of the US government and State Department She continues to stonewall, and the more we know, the more we know how much she has lied. She illustrates the worst possible judgement in this story, so bad you need to stretch your mind to encompass it. This is her history...I am not speaking of any Benghazi investigation, as that will be heard publicly I hope in congress. I am not speaking of anything but what she has shown over the years....a egotist, elitist who absolutely trashes at every chance those she considers to be egotists or elitist. She trashed Wall St while she has been a cozy friend for years and continues. She has shown in inaction how she is not some women rights leader at all, fact is if you read her history, you will find the opposite. It just strikes me strange that this party would allow her to be out there representing a party who in their words over the past years stands against everything that she is. Once the Republican field is narrowed down there can be some serious conversation on those candidates. BUT it seems the Democrats are going to allow this woman to take the mantle next November and that is something I just do not understand. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
She will not be the democratic candidate no matter what the die hards are clinging to and saying/hoping.
HER PERSONAL STOCK IS SIGNIFICANTLY MORE WORTHLESS THAN IT WAS WHEN THE PARTY DUMPED HER IN 2008. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
|
|