Originally Posted by Guest

The racists and KKK had a permit to protest at Charlotesville. If the media hadn't showed up with hundreds of cameras and opponents on the left stayed home making love and peace signs instead showing up for a confrontation we'd be talking about Korea and our lousy economy today. There is no doubt the KKK and racists were looking for some attention and were successful. The media should shoulder a part of blame for the circus that took life of that young girl.

It's a distraction...misdirection. Forget the important stuff and focus on stupid social issues...while they rob us blind. What will the deficit be this year? Another record?

Originally Posted by Guest

Does the name Timothy McVeigh ring a bell? You know, one of your own who blew up a bunch of toddlers. And then there are a few others White extremist murders: Killed at least 60 in U.S. since 1995. , but you know that silly.

Are you affiliated with CNN or one of the other liberal news networks? The word "bunch" used as an adjective reminds me of the media today; not a lot of fact reported, just plenty of adjectives to lead you toward their opinion...

The Oklahoma City Bombing was a horrific act of domestic terrorism! It was contrived by 3 nutjobs, who also happened to be racists...Of the 168 killed, 19 of them were children. Are you saying the 149 adults that were killed were not to be as valued as the 19 children?

I also wonder if you are inferring that all racists are domestic terrorists, and how that compares with people having the opinion that all Muslims are suicide bombers, that all gun owners are a trigger pull away from being a killer, that all blacks are on welfare...

Originally Posted by Guest

Are you affiliated with CNN or one of the other liberal news networks? The word "bunch" used as an adjective reminds me of the media today; not a lot of fact reported, just plenty of adjectives to lead you toward their opinion...

The Oklahoma City Bombing was a horrific act of domestic terrorism! It was contrived by 3 nutjobs, who also happened to be racists...Of the 168 killed, 19 of them were children. Are you saying the 149 adults that were killed were not to be as valued as the 19 children?

I also wonder if you are inferring that all racists are domestic terrorists, and how that compares with people having the opinion that all Muslims are suicide bombers, that all gun owners are a trigger pull away from being a killer, that all blacks are on welfare...

Just half...wouldn't want to exaggerate.

Double-down Dumb Donald, he has no idea what he said!!!!!!!!

Phoenix, AZ


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Nucky

I am shocked at President Trump. He is being way too easy on the press. He should rip them apart. Yeah I already know your reply .

I have family and a close friend in South Korea & Guam. I'm so happy President Trump is at the helm. I know there is a way to do it but I forget how to identify a TOTV'S poster. Who calls the President of our country by his full name? President Donald John Trump! Is that some kind of a demeaning poke at him? I think as long as he's not impeached or his name isn't really Anatoly a little respect is in order. If not what separates us from the people doing wrong at that rally. And don't tell me 350 mile. I respected your guy for the last eight long years by keeping quiet. Try it. It would be helpful to change the culture of this forum. This is a bad place to hang your hat everyday. Get some exercise in that body. President Trump is going to be around for a long time. Good night Ahnahtoleey. Phonetic spelling to help you out.
Хороших ночных демократов.

The funny part of this post is that you edited it. I can't imagine what it was like before.


Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Chi-Town

The funny part of this post is that you edited it. I can't imagine what it was like before.


Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk

Don't bother, he hasn't the stomach for political talk. He won't be back [emoji3]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Guest

Don't bother, he hasn't the stomach for political talk. He won't be back [emoji3]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You are correct. I stopped by for a visit and see the same venom spewed by the same clowns. Instead of fielding my observations you said I'm Greek, Alfred E Newman and did everything to skirt the main question. WHY AND WHO is calling the President by his full name? No motive no political agenda just a simple question. Can you answer it? Do you know? Is it a secret? Is it a code? Are you all nuts? Have fun over here and keep up the good work I can see your discussions have really straightened out this messed up world. Congratulations.

Originally Posted by Guest

Trump is in the process of unequivocally and publicly... showing his true colors!!

I am watching him publicly meltdown at his news conference and proving what he said Saturday...is really what he meant.

Most of us true Americans knew his statement Monday looked like he was being forced to condemn the KKK, supremacists, neo-nazi's and was pizzed about it...and he just proved us correct.

Let's see how many in his own party agree with him trying to make excuses and in essence drawing a moral equivalency between white supremacists, neo-nazi's & KKK...and those who demonstrated against them!!

In the big scheme of things, it was great because it will now make it a whole lot easier for moderate Republicans to vote for his impeachment...when Mueller gets done ripping his head off and $hitting down his neck.


Thanks for that Chump.

You are a poor excuse for an American. Nothing more needs to be said, because all you do is pervert (as perverted as you are) any facts to your anti-American cause. You are a nasty human and do not deserve to be called an American.

The left has accused (without ANY evidence) the President of being a racist and supporting the Nazis. It's interesting to see how stupid they are to parrot liberal talking points from their puppet master, Soros.

On the other hand, those supported by Soros and definitely with facts and evidence to prove they are racists, are given a free pass. It would be too embarrassing for the left to admit that they are the true racists, not Trump.

For example, lets just throw one easily provable example out there that the left CANNOT argue. Hillary R. Clinton.

Hillary is a known racist and supporter of the KKK. Hillary actually said that her close friend, a KKK Grand Dragon was her mentor and that she learned a lot from him. This is real evidence, not accusations like we hear against the President.

A Short History of Democrats, Republicans, and Racism

The following are a few basic historical facts that every American should know.

Fact: The Republican Party was founded primarily to oppose slavery, and Republicans eventually abolished slavery. The Democratic Party fought them and tried to maintain and expand slavery. The 13th Amendment, abolishing slavery, passed in 1865 with 100% Republican support but only 23% Democrat support in congress.

Why is this indisputable fact so rarely mentioned? PBS documentaries about slavery and the Civil War barely mention it, for example. One can certainly argue that the parties have changed in 150 years (more about that below), but that does not change the historical fact that it was the Democrats who supported slavery and the Republicans who opposed it. And that indisputable fact should not be airbrushed out for fear that it will tarnish the modern Democratic Party.

Had the positions of the parties been the opposite, and the Democrats had fought the Republicans to end slavery, the historical party roles would no doubt be repeated incessantly in these documentaries. Funny how that works.

Fact: During the Civil War era, the "Radical Republicans" were given that name because they wanted to not only end slavery but also to endow the freed slaves with full citizenship, equality, and rights.

Yes, that was indeed a radical idea at the time!

Fact: Lincoln's Vice President, Andrew Johnson, was a strongly pro-Union (but also pro-slavery) Democrat who had been chosen by Lincoln as a compromise running mate to attract Democrats. After Lincoln was assassinated, Johnson thwarted Republican efforts in Congress to recognize the civil rights of the freed slaves, and Southern Democrats continued to thwart any such efforts for close to a century.

Fact: The 14th Amendment, giving full citizenship to freed slaves, passed in 1868 with 94% Republican support and 0% Democrat support in congress. The 15th Amendment, giving freed slaves the right to vote, passed in 1870 with 100% Republican support and 0% Democrat support in congress.

Regardless of what has happened since then, shouldn't we be grateful to the Republicans for these Amendments to the Constitution? And shouldn't we remember which party stood for freedom and which party fiercely opposed it?

Fact: The Ku Klux Klan was originally and primarily an arm of the Southern Democratic Party. Its mission was to terrorize freed slaves and "ni**er-loving" (their words) Republicans who sympathized with them.

Why is this fact conveniently omitted in so many popular histories and depictions of the KKK, including PBS documentaries? Had the KKK been founded by Republicans, that fact would no doubt be repeated constantly on those shows.

Fact: In the 1950s, President Eisenhower, a Republican, integrated the US military and promoted civil rights for minorities. Eisenhower pushed through the Civil Rights Act of 1957. One of Eisenhower's primary political opponents on civil rights prior to 1957 was none other than Lyndon Johnson, then the Democratic Senate Majority Leader. LBJ had voted the straight segregationist line until he changed his position and supported the 1957 Act.

Fact: The historic Civil Rights Act of 1964 was supported by a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats in both houses of Congress. In the House, 80 percent of the Republicans and 63 percent of the Democrats voted in favor. In the Senate, 82 percent of the Republicans and 69 percent of the Democrats voted for it.

Fact: Contrary to popular misconception, the parties never "switched" on racism. The Democrats just switched from overt racism to a subversive strategy of getting blacks as dependent as possible on government to secure their votes. At the same time, they began a cynical smear campaign to label anyone who opposes their devious strategy as greedy racists.

Following the epic civil rights struggles of the 1960s, the South began a major demographic shift from Democratic to Republican dominance. Many believe that this shift was motivated by racism. While it is certainly true that many Southern racists abandoned the Democratic Party over its new support for racial equality and integration, the notion that they would flock to the Republican Party -- which was a century ahead of the Democrats on those issues -- makes no sense whatsoever.

Yet virtually every liberal, when pressed on the matter, will inevitably claim that the parties "switched," and most racist Democrats became Republicans! In their minds, this historical ju jitsu maneuver apparently transfers all the past sins of the Democrats (slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow laws, etc.) onto the Republicans and all the past virtues of the Republicans (e.g., ending slavery) onto the Democrats! That's quite a feat!

It is true that Barry Goldwater's opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 probably attracted some racist Democrats to the Republican Party. However, Goldwater was not a racist -- at least not an overt racist like so many Southern Democrats of the time, such as George Wallace and Bull Connor. He publicly professed racial equality, and his opposition to the 1964 Act was based on principled grounds of states rights. In any case, his libertarian views were out of step with the mainstream, and he lost the 1964 Presidential election to LBJ in a landslide.

But Goldwater's opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act provided liberals an opening to tar the Republican Party as racist, and they have tenaciously repeated that label so often over the years that it is now the conventional wisdom among liberals. But it is really nothing more than an unsubstantiated myth -- a convenient political lie. If the Republican Party was any more racist than the Democratic Party even in 1964, why did a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats in both houses of Congress vote for the 1964 Civil Rights Act? The idea that Goldwater's vote on the 1964 Civil Rights Act trumps a century of history of the Republican Party is ridiculous, to say the least.

Every political party has its racists, but the notion that Republicans are more racist than Democrats or any other party is based on nothing more than a constant drumbeat of unsubstantiated innuendo and assertions by Leftists, constantly echoed by the liberal media. It is a classic example of a Big Lie that becomes "true" simply by virtue of being repeated so many times.

A more likely explanation for the long-term shift from Democratic to Republican dominance in the South was the perception, fair or not, that the Democratic Party had rejected traditional Christian religious values and embraced radical secularism. That includes its hardline support for abortion, its rejection of prayer in public schools, its promotion of the gay agenda, and many other issues.

In the 1960s the Democratic Party changed its strategy for dealing with African Americans. Thanks to earlier Republican initiatives on civil rights, blatant racial oppression was no longer a viable political option. Whereas before that time Southern Democrats had overtly and proudly segregated and terrorized blacks, the national Democratic Party decided instead to be more subtle and get them as dependent on government as possible. As LBJ so elegantly put it (in a famous moment of candor that was recorded for posterity), "I'll have those ******* voting Democratic for the next 200 years." At the same time, the Democrats started a persistent campaign of lies and innuendo, falsely equating any opposition to their welfare state with racism.

From a purely cynical political perspective, the Democratic strategy of black dependence has been extremely effective. LBJ knew exactly what he was doing. African Americans routinely vote well over 90 percent Democratic for fear that Republicans will cut their government benefits and welfare programs. And what is the result? Before LBJ's Great Society welfare programs, the black illegitimacy rate was as low as 23 percent, but now it has more than tripled to 72 percent.

Most major American city governments have been run by liberal Democrats for decades, and most of those cities have large black sections that are essentially dysfunctional anarchies. Cities like Detroit are overrun by gangs and drug dealers, with burned out homes on every block in some areas. The land values are so low due to crime, blight, and lack of economic opportunity that condemned homes are not even worth rebuilding. Who wants to build a home in an urban war zone? Yet they keep electing liberal Democrats -- and blaming "racist" Republicans for their problems!

Washington DC is another city that has been dominated by liberal Democrats for decades. It spends more per capita on students than almost any other city in the world, yet it has some of the worst academic achievement anywhere and is a drug-infested hellhole. Barack Obama would not dream of sending his own precious daughters to the DC public schools, of course -- but he assures us that those schools are good enough for everyone else. In fact, Obama was instrumental in killing a popular and effective school voucher program in DC, effectively killing hopes for many poor black families trapped in those dysfunctional public schools. His allegiance to the teachers unions apparently trumps his concern for poor black families.

A strong argument could also be made that Democratic support for perpetual affirmative action is racist. It is, after all, the antithesis of Martin Luther King's dream of a color-blind society. Not only is it "reverse racism," but it is based on the premise that African Americans are incapable of competing in the free market on a level playing field. In other words, it is based on the notion of white supremacy, albeit "benevolent" white supremacy rather than the openly hostile white supremacy of the pre-1960s Democratic Party.

The next time someone claims that Republicans are racist and Democrats are not, don't fall for it.

Source: A Short History of Democrats, Republicans, and Racism





Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Originally Posted by dbussune

........ .....

The next time someone claims that Republicans are racist and Democrats are not, don't fall for it.

Source: A Short History of Democrats, Republicans, and Racism

Your use of a single person's biased, personal opinion blog to prove your point...is as pathetic as continued attempts in trying to twist facts.

A perfect example of lying by omission, is trying to pat Eisenhower on the back for integrating the military, which flies in the face of the facts...and is just another outright lie.

Decent people will see right through it and understand that yes, in the beginning the south was mostly Democratic and were the true racists (think 'Dixiecrats')...but that long ago changed.

So your desperate attempt to deny that Republicans have been the ones fighting against equality for blacks, for many decades now...is simply your way to try and hide your own bigotry.



How Republicans and Democrats switched on civil rights

At war’s end, President Harry Truman, a Democrat, used an Executive Order to integrate the troops. (That order was not executed until 1963, however because: racism.)

Deepest Sincere Wishes:

Originally Posted by Guest

Your use of a single person's biased, personal opinion blog to prove your point...is as pathetic as continued attempts in trying to twist facts.

A perfect example of lying by omission, is trying to pat Eisenhower on the back for integrating the military, which flies in the face of the facts...and is just another outright lie.

Decent people will see right through it and understand that yes, in the beginning the south was mostly Democratic and were the true racists (think 'Dixiecrats')...but that long ago changed.

So your desperate attempt to deny that Republicans have been the ones fighting against equality for blacks, for many decades now...is simply your way to try and hide your own bigotry.



How Republicans and Democrats switched on civil rights





Deepest Sincere Wishes:

Integration and the destruction of America really got rolling with LBJ and his "great society". That is when America stopped bringing in white immigrants and switched to black/brown. It's when the dilution began in earnest. America has been falling in world ranking ever since. It's CAUSATION...the more brown/blacks, the WORSE a place is. I keep asking for the black villages, the black MIT, the black Newton and Einstein, a successful independent black country...all I get is the sound of crickets.

Blacks are NOT "human". They are NOT us. They are genetically a different species. They are "apes that can talk"...they are "close but no cigar". They are being PROTECTED from enslavement. They don't belong in a modern advanced civilization. Just look at them...look how they act and live in the inner cities. Are THEY your peers? They are NOT. What we know/see of blacks are the 1%...the 99% live on MLK Blvd...go visit them...see what you're going to get when/if we completely diversify.

Originally Posted by Don Baldwin

Integration and the destruction of America really got rolling with LBJ and his "great society". That is when America stopped bringing in white immigrants and switched to black/brown. It's when the dilution began in earnest. America has been falling in world ranking ever since. It's CAUSATION...the more brown/blacks, the WORSE a place is. I keep asking for the black villages, the black MIT, the black Newton and Einstein, a successful independent black country...all I get is the sound of crickets.



Blacks are NOT "human". They are NOT us. They are genetically a different species. They are "apes that can talk"...they are "close but no cigar". They are being PROTECTED from enslavement. They don't belong in a modern advanced civilization. Just look at them...look how they act and live in the inner cities. Are THEY your peers? They are NOT. What we know/see of blacks are the 1%...the 99% live on MLK Blvd...go visit them...see what you're going to get when/if we completely diversify.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Guest

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Starting that again? Mentally 10 again?

Prove me wrong you ignorant brainwashed idiot.