Originally Posted by Guest

No, Evangelicals will still come to Benny since he seems sincere about being Christian.

The main stream Republicans are going to leave Benny in droves with his lies about West Point and the stories about being a violent youth.

By the way, Benny didn't apparently know the entire education is free at West Point. No such thing as a "full scholarship" there since no cadet pays anything.

Also, Benny made references in his book to Congressional Medal of Honor "winners". Wrong again, Benny. They are recepients!

Just another racist hater! (Taken directly from the Democrat play book.)

Originally Posted by Guest

Amazing how the liberal media and news sources will cruify black republician, but let's know lair's, racists, and socialists walk on water.

Carson is gaining in the polls. The liberal media will dig up anything to cruify him, Lilly white halo b itch gets free pass. Amazing

Seems like you're confused about the vetting process of someone running for President of the United States.

Originally Posted by Guest

Seems like you're confused about the vetting process of someone running for President of the United States.

I actually thought I totally understood that vetting process; I really and truly did.

Then I watched in 2007 and 2008 important things which had to do with background be not only ignored, but NEVER discussed. Ok, that's over.

Now we have candidates on both sides that need vetting, and we focus on Ben Carson, and what appears to be an exaggeration in his book while we ignore others of more import.

I am not a Carson fan, by any stretch, but he is a good, honest man who is being ripped apart, while the media has a love fest with candidates that they approve us.

We have a candidate who according to Black Lives Matter embraces their cause and all they stand for: this candidate has publicly and privately endorsed them. They, and their founders are avowed anarchists. Why is this not vetted ?

We have another candidate who has obviously intimidarpted the media, and they instead of vetting report on him as if he were a realty show.

We have another canidate who is an avowed socialist and proud of it, and he seldom is asked about that leaning.

I am in no way confused about vetting. There must have been a meeting in 2007 where they changed the rules, and we now as voters must do our own vetting.

The Carson media outburst embarrasses me as someone who cares about character. Hearing this incident become THE incident when there are canidates on both sides who have much larger items to vetting is simply embarrassing.

He said this in his book; have any of you even read the books of the other canidates ? Have any of you ever then read the lies told in those books ?

Do not lecture me on vetting please

Originally Posted by Guest

No, Evangelicals will still come to Benny since he seems sincere about being Christian.

The main stream Republicans are going to leave Benny in droves with his lies about West Point and the stories about being a violent youth.

By the way, Benny didn't apparently know the entire education is free at West Point. No such thing as a "full scholarship" there since no cadet pays anything.

Also, Benny made references in his book to Congressional Medal of Honor "winners". Wrong again, Benny. They are recepients!

There are words for folks who would post something like this. I, as an adult, do not use such words, so allow me to simply extend pity to you and hope your hatred fades soon. You obviously are either uninformed or have your head in the sand.

Originally Posted by Guest

There are words for folks who would post something like this. I, as an adult, do not use such words, so allow me to simply extend pity to you and hope your hatred fades soon. You obviously are either uninformed or have your head in the sand.

What was said that was untrue? Benny is a nickname for Ben. Nothing hateful nor racist.

Look at all the racist names that you and your Tea Party cohorts have called President Obama. Shame on you!

Originally Posted by Guest

I think the problem here is people like you that are so republican blind that nothing will change you mind about voting otherwise. Go back and see Obama was scrutinized. If Hitler was running as a republican you would vote for him.

Actually the Gentleman or Lady is Republican aware! Being as we were raised to take responsibility for ourselves and our actions we cannot afford to wander aimlessly while waiting for our next ebt refill!!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

What was said that was untrue? Benny is a nickname for Ben. Nothing hateful nor racist.

Look at all the racist names that you and your Tea Party cohorts have called President Obama. Shame on you!

1. I am not a member of the Tea Party/

2. Do you have any idea how silly, immature and downright stupid you and your cronies sound with all the Tea Party talk ? You totally manifest ignorance with that constant stream.

3. You really think that people on here do not recognize posters ? Again, you manifest ignorance and try to be coy.

4. The fact that you find your post acceptable simply makes my point.

I can daydream can't I about the possibility that the electorate would all get wise and refuse to go along with any politician who is being less than honest with them.

Those addicted to a politicians kool- aide have to first admit they have a problem that being gullible or perhaps misguided into believing that not facing up to the facts is only hurting them.

If a politician lies, commits an unlawful act, exaggerates, makes promises that s/he cannot possible keep, falsifies information, etc as voters we all need to call them out and tell them we can't and won't be fool As voters we can then decide if the degree and nature of the act(s) are serious enough to eliminate he/she from consideration.

but we won't because partisan voters bought into the canard of winning at all costs. but inning at all costs have serious consequences: to wit Obama disastrous seven years.

Progressives want to crucify Rubio for his personal finances but ignore the Clinton's charitable foundation, white water, cattle futures, etc and in fact defend their position. Its shear madness and coupled with clinton's placing this nation at great security risk because she chose to use a personal server its criminal negligence

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

I can daydream can't I about the possibility that the electorate would all get wise and refuse to go along with any politician who is being less than honest with them.

Those addicted to a politicians kool- aide have to first admit they have a problem that being gullible or perhaps misguided into believing that not facing up to the facts is only hurting them.

If a politician lies, commits an unlawful act, exaggerates, makes promises that s/he cannot possible keep, falsifies information, etc as voters we all need to call them out and tell them we can't and won't be fool As voters we can then decide if the degree and nature of the act(s) are serious enough to eliminate he/she from consideration.

but we won't because partisan voters bought into the canard of winning at all costs. but inning at all costs have serious consequences: to wit Obama disastrous seven years.

Progressives want to crucify Rubio for his personal finances but ignore the Clinton's charitable foundation, white water, cattle futures, etc and in fact defend their position. Its shear madness and coupled with clinton's placing this nation at great security risk because she chose to use a personal server its criminal negligence

Personal Best Regards:

Three thoughtful well written paragraphs. Then the urge to bloviate took over. Too bad.

Originally Posted by Guest

Three thoughtful well written paragraphs. Then the urge to bloviate took over. Too bad.

Depends on who you are.

I thought the last two were very accurate, easily proven.

Seems when it comes to Ms Clinton, they bow at her feet and refuse to accept facts and blame all her woes on "right wing conspiracy".

The two paragraphs you dismiss can be easily proven so I am guessing facts are not "your thing" and your PARTY is.

THAT is what is "Too bad"

Originally Posted by Guest

Three thoughtful well written paragraphs. Then the urge to bloviate took over. Too bad.

You are still free to have your opinion. Maybe not for so long, but you can right now. I happen to agree with that poster and most likely everyone but you agrees with him. But, criticize away. After all, the liberals criticize and the conservatives take action on issues of importance. You know, you really do ask for it, so please don't bother us with whining about the big bad conservatives.

And no, I have never been to a Tea Party meeting, so don't bother. Associating me with them is actually a compliment, so your choice.

Looks like the evidence grows of a hit job by Politico in service to their string pullers. Good write up and updates here.


No, Ben Carson Didn't Lie About West Point. It's Another Media Hit Job. | Daily Wire

Originally Posted by Guest

Looks like the evidence grows of a hit job by Politico in service to their string pullers. Good write up and updates here.


No, Ben Carson Didn't Lie About West Point. It's Another Media Hit Job. | Daily Wire

And a save by the Daily Wire. [emoji6]

Originally Posted by Guest

And a save by the Daily Wire. [emoji6]

Your sarcasm is expected.

Hope you have funny remarks as this story develops next week, assuming the media cares.

Recall, when your hero of great character, Ms Clinton did not recall signing anything when she became Secy of State ? Well, the American Enterprise Institute, no doubt a part of the vast right wing conspiracy that is always behind any of the Clinton problems, filed a federal lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act and they obtained on Thursday a copy of the Non Disclosure Agreement signed by MS Clinton. You can see it here

https://cei.org/sites/default/files/...11062015_0.pdf

I am sure and your minions who will defend ANYTHING and EVERYTHING as long as they are Democrats will minimize this, and I am not a lawyer so it has no dramatic impact on my thinking, but since the MSM is not even discussing it (they are still mesmerized with that dirty rat Ben Carson) I suppose it will just take time.

I might add for your amusement since you find mocking Carson just such fun. I discovered this on SNOPES...

It is not something that the media cares about or ever did, nor do you and your cohorts on here, but it speaks to Obama speaking of his parents...and his birth..

"Obama told his audience that, because some folks had the courage to "march across a bridge" in Selma, Alabama, his mother, a white woman from Kansas, and his father, a black Muslim from Africa, took heart. It gave them the courage to get married and have a child. The problem with that characterization is that Barack Obama, Jr. was born on August 4, 1961, while the first of three marches across that bridge in Selma didn't occur until March 7, 1965, at least five years after Obama's parents met."

Now, he did not directly lie at all. Fact is SNOPES makes that very clear. The say this...."Senator Obama might be considered guilty of engaging in little pandering here by trying to imply a direct line between the 1965 Selma, Alabama, marches and his personal background"

Say What, Barack? : snopes.com

Also for your enjoyment is this from President Obama' book in 1995..his memoirs.....In the preface he says....""Although much of this book is based on contemporaneous journals or the oral histories of my family, the dialogue is necessarily an approximation of what was actually said or relayed to me." "For the sake of compression, some of the characters that appear are composites of people, I've known, and some events appear out of precise chronology."

Recall his girlfriend he discussed in that book which was someone who did not actually exist ? Recall the outrage by progressive websites that folks at Politico did not acknowledge what he said about composites instead of real people.

Well now, Atlantic was taking them to task for not mentioning that Obama had said he used composites and in defending him with great vigor, they said this...."Sounds like a pretty big deal, right? While the authors of literary memoirs are sometimes cut some slack, it'd be major news if the president of the United States was just now admitting that a character in his highly lauded, bestselling autobiography was fabricated, and only after being caught red-handed."

Obama's Composite Girlfriend: How Politico and Drudge Created Fake News - The Atlantic


I suppose that "slack" does not apply to our Mr Carson, but all of the mysterious things about President Obama s past are part of the Right Wing Conspiracy and is simply something that the Tea Party came up with.

Typical character assassination by the Liberal media. And liberals are so lazy that they will jump to ride on the band wagon without questioning the veracity of the accusations.