Originally Posted by Guest

I find it interesting to see that since the election,Benghazi is no longer important to Republicans. Why is that?

Actually there are several responses to your question. One of them is the left stalls, recognizing that Americans have a short attention span. and here you are bringing up this uncomfortable issue again. watch it your lefty big brothers will be all over you.

But what intrigues most is that when it comes to issues of national prominence such as Benghazi, IRS, scandal Fast & Furious etc the left isn't patriotic enough to simply demand that our elected leaders come clean. No its always party first and never country first. Hmmmmmm

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Actually there are several responses to your question. One of them is the left stalls, recognizing that Americans have a short attention span. and here you are bringing up this uncomfortable issue again. watch it your lefty big brothers will be all over you.

But what intrigues most is that when it comes to issues of national prominence such as Benghazi, IRS, scandal Fast & Furious etc the left isn't patriotic enough to simply demand that our elected leaders come clean. No its always party first and never country first. Hmmmmmm

Personal Best Regards:

It's CAUSE first...whatever the latest cause is.

Originally Posted by Yung Dum

I find it interesting to see that since the election,Benghazi is no longer important to Republicans. Why is that?

Duh, Hillary lost.... thankfully.

What is the purpose of this thread.... really, think it though.

Drop the hatred and look forward to a greater America!

Originally Posted by Guest

Duh, Hillary lost.... thankfully.

What is the purpose of this thread.... really, think it though.

Drop the hatred and look forward to a greater America!

ONLY if you make it "white" again. We're on an express elevator to 3rd world hell. Minorities are already the majority according to Joe Biden...minorities ARE the majority below age 7. Within 30 years, the country is lost, becoming Mexico II. It's a mathematical certainty.

Unless we act decisively and quickly. The anchor babies MUST be declared non-citizens and sent back. Along with their children. "Under the jurisdiction of" is NOT here illegally. They were NEVER legal citizens. Politics made them legal. Rich bast@rds wanting an edge, to make more profit brought them here and try to keep them here. The food industry.

Originally Posted by Guest

Nothing?

Seven key findings in the Benghazi report | TheHill

The only thing in there is what was said on the Sunday News shows after the attack.

So what is your point?

Originally Posted by Guest

ONLY if you make it "white" again. We're on an express elevator to 3rd world hell. Minorities are already the majority according to Joe Biden...minorities ARE the majority below age 7. Within 30 years, the country is lost, becoming Mexico II. It's a mathematical certainty.

Unless we act decisively and quickly. The anchor babies MUST be declared non-citizens and sent back. Along with their children. "Under the jurisdiction of" is NOT here illegally. They were NEVER legal citizens. Politics made them legal. Rich bast@rds wanting an edge, to make more profit brought them here and try to keep them here. The food industry.

While I agree that ANCHOR babies are causing a problem is but nothing can be done as they are CITIZENS under the CONSTITUTION. That amendment was done after the CIVIL WAR which kinda blows a whole in your rich guy theory.

Originally Posted by Guest

While I agree that ANCHOR babies are causing a problem is but nothing can be done as they are CITIZENS under the CONSTITUTION. That amendment was done after the CIVIL WAR which kinda blows a whole in your rich guy theory.

For the slaves... ANOTHER mistake!

The Constitution says..."under the jurisdiction of" but someone here illegally is NOT under the jurisdiction of...they snuck in and are sneaking around so as not to be discovered. If you snuck into my house, are you under my jurisdiction? If you break into a building, are you under its owners jurisdiction? NO you are not. The anchor babies were given citizenship for political reasons for the benefit of the big ag businesses.

Originally Posted by Guest

The only thing in there is what was said on the Sunday News shows after the attack.

So what is your point?

In your post you stated, "If Hillary failed to do her job why could 5 million dollars and years of investigation could find nothing."

My point (which was obviously beyond your level of comprehension), was that there were several key findings as the result of the investigation and not "NOTHING" as you falsely stated in your post.

Originally Posted by Guest

ONLY if you make it "white" again. We're on an express elevator to 3rd world hell. Minorities are already the majority according to Joe Biden...minorities ARE the majority below age 7. Within 30 years, the country is lost, becoming Mexico II. It's a mathematical certainty.

Unless we act decisively and quickly. The anchor babies MUST be declared non-citizens and sent back. Along with their children. "Under the jurisdiction of" is NOT here illegally. They were NEVER legal citizens. Politics made them legal. Rich bast@rds wanting an edge, to make more profit brought them here and try to keep them here. The food industry.

Let me address your overall concern and that is the proportion of white to non-white population. Its too late the die has been cast. There simply a greater percentage of whites dying to whites being born. Minorities are having more babies and add to that legal immigration.

simply look at sports teams, movies, television, advertising, music industry etc and already minorities prevail. yet the laws pertaining to discrimination, quotas, etc continue on the books. Hate crimes protect the protected classes but not white heterosexuals.

We should all be on equal footing with equal opportunity. progressive overreached with their social justice campaigns which have gain momentum.

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

For the slaves... ANOTHER mistake!

The Constitution says..."under the jurisdiction of" but someone here illegally is NOT under the jurisdiction of...they snuck in and are sneaking around so as not to be discovered. If you snuck into my house, are you under my jurisdiction? If you break into a building, are you under its owners jurisdiction? NO you are not. The anchor babies were given citizenship for political reasons for the benefit of the big ag businesses.

If I peek under the hood would I find out resident racist? Let me see. Yep it's him yet again!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

In your post you stated, "If Hillary failed to do her job why could 5 million dollars and years of investigation could find nothing."

My point (which was obviously beyond your level of comprehension), was that there were several key findings as the result of the investigation and not "NOTHING" as you falsely stated in your post.

But NOT that she did anything wrong....and my iQ is 140 what's yours?

Originally Posted by Guest

But NOT that she did anything wrong....and my iQ is 140 what's yours?

I never stated that she did. An IQ of 140...hardly?

Originally Posted by Guest

With all due respect, your prior posts are probably more indicative of your political leanings than your nephews military service.

I am a Proud Democrat but a lefty I am not! Republicans can just not understand that.

If we debated immigration I'll bet I am to the right of you!

Originally Posted by Guest

I never stated that she did. An IQ of 140...hardly?

Read it and weep tested I am 140!

Originally Posted by Guest

In your post you stated, "If Hillary failed to do her job why could 5 million dollars and years of investigation could find nothing."

My point (which was obviously beyond your level of comprehension), was that there were several key findings as the result of the investigation and not "NOTHING" as you falsely stated in your post.

But those finding were NOT against Hillary Clinton:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/u...hazi.html?_r=0

Over and Out on this subject!