Originally Posted by Guest

Not me personally, but my people are. You live in their civilization, you enjoy the fruits of their labor. Western civilization is white civilization. Cars, TV, computers, ALL invented and developed by white people. The minorities brought what to the party? Disease, violence, and neediness? What positive thing do they bring with them? What happens when a place becomes filled with minorities?

I am a product of my environment. I see my environment deteriorate as they multiply. Can you name a place that got better by becoming 90% black? Hispanic? What they do, their ACTIONS is why I want nothing to do with them. Why I don't want them around. Why would you want them around?

My people discovered fire a LONG time ago and proceeded to build the great civilization you live in today. What have the blacks/hispanics accomplished? Where is their great civilization? Their great achievements? Great accomplishments? Great inventions. They were BOTH living in grass huts when we found them, the American Indians at least had stonework, they were stone age people when we found them. Blacks had no written language, no wheel, no agriculture, no domesticated draft animals. They're CAVE MEN without the cave.

They're NOT us...we've had 50,000 years of a head start. It shows how UNEQUAL we really are. We have the villages, they have S and W Chicago, Oakland, Newark, Elizabeth...We live well, they live like animals. It's their violence that separates us the most.

Quotas and diversity doesn't work.

You sound very much like a man from the last century that had a little square mustache. That whole thing didn't work out very well for him. I'm done with you.

Originally Posted by guest

i saw this and thought of bob;

there are african americans, mexican americans, asian americans, arab americans, etc.

And then there are just americans...


You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction. You call me 'white boy', 'cracker', 'honkey', 'whitey'... And that's ok...

But when i call you n1gger, kike, towel head, sand-n1gger, camel jockey, beaner, gook, or chink ... You call me a racist.


You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you...

So why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live in?


You have the united negro college fund.
You have martin luther king day.
You have black history month.
You have cesar chavez day.
You have yom hashoah.
You have ma'uled al-nabi.
You have the naacp.
You have bet...


Imagine if we had wet (white entertainment television)...we'd be racists.
If we had a white pride day, you would call us racists.
If we had white history month, we'd be racists.
If we had any organization for whites only to 'advance' our lives, we'd be racists.


We have a hispanic chamber of commerce, a black chamber of commerce, and then we just have the plain chamber of commerce.

Wonder who pays for that???


A white woman could not be in the miss black american pageant, but a woman of any color can be in the miss america pageant.

If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships... You know we'd be racists.


There are over 60 openly proclaimed black colleges in the us ...yet if there were 'white colleges', that would be a racist college.

In the million men march, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights.

If we marched for our race and rights,you would call us racists.


You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it.

But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.


You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us.

But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.


Why is it that only whites can be racists???

you are in fact a bigoted damn fool

Originally Posted by Guest

you are in fact a bigoted damn fool

What part of it isn't true? Answer that before you call him names...names is all you have...you have NO rational defense, only subjective. "You're wrong because you should be wrong" isn't a defense. What is wrong is your initial fallacy of calling them equal. That's where it all starts falling apart. If you give up that theory, everything else makes perfect sense. Their actions, violence, lack of ambition, intelligence, impetuousness, poverty, etc.

WHY do you disagree with him? We KNOW you disagree Susie...tell us how he's wrong...I dare you. Is that what it'll take one of your to stand up and try to defend their actions?