Originally Posted by janmcn

The fact that he quit was an admission of guilt. You can't blame the victims when there were too many to count. Herman knew there was lots more coming out.

The "god-forsaken liberal democrat media" that you mention has a lot more republicans on than Fox has democrats. Google Fox Viewers Misinformed to see the results of a study that says Fox viewers are not very bright (to put it kindly).

Originally Posted by notlongnow

OK maybe I am misreading your post but none of the articles stated "not very bright".
I was reading your post as you interpreting what the articles meant was not very bright.
If that is not what you meant then I apologize for inferring that.

The quote at the top was not from me, but from janmcn.

Oh my God. My age is starting to show itself. I got mixed up on my own post.
I stand corrected, sorry.

So all I said to janmcn

I hope that does not show I am not very bright!!!

Please accept my apology. I will try to pay more attention from now on.

Originally Posted by notlongnow

Oh my God. My age is starting to show itself. I got mixed up on my own post.
I stand corrected, sorry.

So all I said to janmcn

I hope that does not show I am not very bright!!!

Please accept my apology. I will try to pay more attention from now on.

No problem, I think you are quite bright actually.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

And your views represents Gingrich's double digit rise in the primary polls.........how?

I'm not going to comment on your slanted view of Gingrich, but I will say that nobody's going to be perfect. If you're looking for perfection, forget it; I'm not running.

It's not likely that I'll change my view of Gingrich anytime soon.

Having said that, if he's the GOP nominee, I'll vote for him. My thought process will likely be very much the same as I had for the 2008 election. I voted for Obama as the "lesser of two evils". Did I think he really represented "hope and change"? No. But after McCain sold out to the far right and his handlers, and even though he was a multiple incident cancer survivor picked an unqualified person as his VP running mate, he lost me. My thought at the time--and I said it here several times--was if Obama doesn't work out, I simply won't vote for him again.

The President isn't as bad as many here would have him, but still not a good enough leader for a country that desperately needs leadership. He's been hampered by a dysfunctional Congress, but I can't write off all that has been done or not done to that excuse. So I'll be voting for his opponent. And again I'll say--if that person (Mitt or Newt) is elected and doesn't work out, I'll be voting for someone else in 2016.

Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna

It's not likely that I'll change my view of Gingrich anytime soon.

Having said that, if he's the GOP nominee, I'll vote for him. My thought process will likely be very much the same as I had for the 2008 election. I voted for Obama as the "lesser of two evils". Did I think he really represented "hope and change"? No. But after McCain sold out to the far right and his handlers, and even though he was a multiple incident cancer survivor picked an unqualified person as his VP running mate, he lost me. My thought at the time--and I said it here several times--was if Obama doesn't work out, I simply won't vote for him again.

The President isn't as bad as many here would have him, but still not a good enough leader for a country that desperately needs leadership. He's been hampered by a dysfunctional Congress, but I can't write off all that has been done or not done to that excuse. So I'll be voting for his opponent. And again I'll say--if that person (Mitt or Newt) is elected and doesn't work out, I'll be voting for someone else in 2016.

Very rational, and I agree with virtually everything you say. I am in hopes that making a choice between Obama and Gingrich is not one I am presented with.

Originally Posted by eweissenbach

Right out of the right-wing playbook richie, I would expect more from you. Blame the alleged victims and then make the media the strawman, then you can explain away any transgression. According to many the source of many of the allegations against cain was that infamous liberal media mogul, rick perry. Shameful behavior from a mostly thoughtful contributor to this forum.

Bull dingies!! Refute one thing I said. I double dog dare ya!! Women don't lie? How much compensation and trips and possible book deals are these women being promised? Do you know?

There's no evidence; none, nada, zippo. I reject your argument because you have no substantiation, and you can take your silly comments as to my behavior and you know what to do with them.

Originally Posted by eweissenbach

The thing that is apparent to some of us is that cain was NO threat to Obama, so good riddance.

Obviously you're wrong or the media wouldn't have lynched this candidate with no hard evidence of any sort.

Losing your edge Richie?

Originally Posted by DaleMN

Losing your edge Richie?

???????; sometimes you just have to backhand.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Not quite true. There were only 2 women who say anything. Another was given permission to say and didn't, so she is to be ignored on the face of it.

The other two women have backgrounds of other baseless charges and gold digging, and no evidence. No text's, no phone messages, no semen stained dress, no state troopers bringing her to his room; nothing.

You only believe it because of who he is, or was. A threat to "the one".

If Herman Cain had been the nominee, President Obama would be the luckiest man on earth. Almost as lucky as he was when Alan Keyes ran against him for US Senator from IL.

Where is Ann Coulter now saying "our black is better than their black"?

Originally Posted by janmcn

If Herman Cain had been the nominee, President Obama would be the luckiest man on earth. Almost as lucky as he was when Alan Keyes ran against him for US Senator from IL.

Where is Ann Coulter now saying "our black is better than their black"?

I think she would still be saying that. Of course to understand that you really should read her column. Just reading headlines doesn't tell you much.

Her latest column on the Cain lynching is even more educational. Of course, it would put to a question all your preconceived notions, so maybe it would upset you if you actually read it.

http://www.anncoulter.com/

Originally Posted by RichieLion

???????; sometimes you just have to backhand.

OOOOOH, I've been backhanded by richie. Must have hit a nerve.

Originally Posted by eweissenbach

OOOOOH, I've been backhanded by richie. Must have hit a nerve.

Good; you're paying attention. Now if you read back you'll see that all your previous Cain comments were purely emotional and not evidential. and then that your assessment of my comments were gratuitous and without substance.

I realize of course that you won't see this, but it's not ultimately important that you do.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Bull dingies!! Refute one thing I said. I double dog dare ya!! Women don't lie? How much compensation and trips and possible book deals are these women being promised? Do you know?

There's no evidence; none, nada, zippo. I reject your argument because you have no substantiation, and you can take your silly comments as to my behavior and you know what to do with them.

Bull dingies- really? Where did I say women don't lie? You ask one good question, how much compensation and trips and possible book deals ARE these women being promised richie? I reject your argument because you have no substantiation, and you can take your silly comments and you know what to do with them.

Cain was in fact a threat to Obama's ability to be the sole black candidate and carrying the majority of the black vote. Regardless the degree of threat or not, Cain would have pulled black votes away from Obama.

Cain would have completely negated Obama and his staff to use the race card for select issues.

To label Cain as a non threat is not at all accurate. A testimony to his threat was the expedient method in which all Cain's accusers, have hidden away satisfied with life until now.

Obama and the party have only one real reaction to Cains departure from the race (pun intended)........whew!!!! Thank GOD or whoever.

btk