Originally Posted by RichieLion

And your views represents Gingrich's double digit rise in the primary polls.........how?

I'm not going to comment on your slanted view of Gingrich, but I will say that nobody's going to be perfect. If you're looking for perfection, forget it; I'm not running.

Too bad your former state's governor didn't have the guts to run for president, which is really funny because he appears to have plenty of guts.

Yeah, it was a very slow television night so I even watched a little bit of the "forum". Pam Blondie definitely relies on her looks which is a good thing because there is not much substance as compared to her fluff.

Originally Posted by janmcn

Too bad your former state's governor didn't have the guts to run for president, which is really funny because he appears to have plenty of guts.

He's got that. We already have enough liberal Republicans running, though. I don't think we need another one.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

He's got that. We already have enough liberal Republicans running, though. I don't think we need another one.

If by "liberal republicans" you mean common sense, free-thinking, and fiscally responsible, yeah, we don't need more of those.

Since Herman Cain "suspended" his campaign and didn't end it, does he get secret service protection indefinitly? How long do the US tax payers have to pay to have this two-timing, grifter tailed? His wife probably loves the idea.

Originally Posted by eweissenbach

If by "liberal republicans" you mean common sense, free-thinking, and fiscally responsible, yeah, we don't need more of those.

Fiscally responsible Liberal...is that sorta like "jumbo shrimp" or "good grief" or "alone together" or "act naturally"? Thanks for the best laugh I have had all weekend!!!

Originally Posted by KatzPajamas

Fiscally responsible Liberal...is that sorta like "jumbo shrimp" or "good grief" or "alone together" or "act naturally"? Thanks for the best laugh I have had all weekend!!!

I think you missed the point, but thanks for playing.

Herman's announcement yesterday was the best cover up by a candidate I've ever seen who obviously got spanked by his wife for hs transgressions.

However the more interesting story is in whom Herman will endorse?????

Originally Posted by eweissenbach

If by "liberal republicans" you mean common sense, free-thinking, and fiscally responsible, yeah, we don't need more of those.

That's what you get out of the phrase "liberal Republican"? I'm willing to bet you haven't voted for many of them.

Originally Posted by rubicon

Herman's announcement yesterday was the best cover up by a candidate I've ever seen who obviously got spanked by his wife for hs transgressions.

However the more interesting story is in whom Herman will endorse?????

Everybody willing to crucify a man with no proof from anyone. Only the word of women with more than questionable backgrounds and motives.

All you have is lame gossip reporting of a god-forsaken liberal democrat media that doesn't do any in depth reporting when it would benefit a Republican. You might as well be listening to TMZ.

I'm saying it's shameful behavior from mostly thoughtful contributors to this forum.

Originally Posted by eweissenbach

If by "liberal republicans" you mean common sense, free-thinking, and fiscally responsible, yeah, we don't need more of those.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

That's what you get out of the phrase "liberal Republican"? I'm willing to bet you haven't voted for many of them.

If you are confirming that is what you meant by "liberal republicans", then yes, I have voted for many, though don't expect many more to make it to the general elections.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Everybody willing to crucify a man with no proof from anyone. Only the word of women with more than questionable backgrounds and motives.

All you have is lame gossip reporting of a god-forsaken liberal democrat media that doesn't do any in depth reporting when it would benefit a Republican. You might as well be listening to TMZ.

I'm saying it's shameful behavior from mostly thoughtful contributors to this forum.

Interesting admonishment from one who thinks ann coulter is a serious contributor to political discourse.

Ouch!! He got you with that one, Richie.

Originally Posted by eweissenbach

If you are confirming that is what you meant by "liberal republicans", then yes, I have voted for many, though don't expect many more to make it to the general elections.

Originally Posted by eweissenbach

Interesting admonishment from one who thinks ann coulter is a serious contributor to political discourse.

Both of these comments are quite foolish on their face alone.

How have I "confirmed" anything? I only used the phrase "liberal republican". The "defining" of the statement is in your mind.

Your defamation of Ann Coulter itself is the spurious act of an biased reader. If you can really read Ms. Coulter and find no truth in what she says, it says more about you than about her.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Both of these comments are quite foolish on their face alone.

How have I "confirmed" anything? I only used the phrase "liberal republican". The "defining" of the statement is in your mind.

Your defamation of Ann Coulter itself is the spurious act of an biased reader. If you can really read Ms. Coulter and find no truth in what she says, it says more about you than about her.

Sorry I don't measure up to your self-imposed standards, along with many others on this board. As for coulter, your comment is foolish in assuming that I find no truth in what she says. I find bits of truth in what she says when I can stomach the venom. What I would like it to say about me is that I find her vulgar and disgusting and would prefer people who can comment without being strident.