Originally Posted by Guest

The GOP must have a pretty low bar if they think a woman that lost her senate race by 10% points and got fired from her job at Hewitt-Packard is accomplished, smart and fearless. Sarah Palin at least got elected governor once in her life.

Where does Carly stand on the TPA? Where does Carly stand on the XXE? Where does Carly stand on the IUD? Let's hear her positions before we cast our votes.

I'm still waiting for you to give us a list of comparative accomplishments ...ie side by side, mano-a-mano between Hillary and Carly.

But, no liberal has yet accepted the challenge, and after multiple requests. I'm beginning to think that's because you can't.

Originally Posted by Guest

I'm still waiting for you to give us a list of comparative accomplishments ...ie side by side, mano-a-mano between Hillary and Carly.

But, no liberal has yet accepted the challenge, and after multiple requests. I'm beginning to think that's because you can't.

I'm beginning to think you're in charge here. This is a thread about whether Carly is presidential material as in "Carly Fiorina steps closer to the plate" There already is a thread with a couple hundred posts about Mrs. Clinton's qualifications.

Originally Posted by Guest

Since you talk about a woman candidate in such a disrespectful way (ie birdcage comment) I can only assume you are an incorrigible woman-hating sexist pig. I'm offended.

Besides, you don't understand the basic strategy she is employing. She's running for VP not Presidential nod. And, I think she has an excellent chance of getting it for a lot of reasons. She's accomplished, smart and apparently fearless.

Read the Fox News Poll and you will that Carly also got the less than 1 percent for VP choice.

Originally Posted by Guest

Read the Fox News Poll and you will that Carly also got the less than 1 percent for VP choice.

We've already discussed this ... the polls at this point are largely irrelevant. Try to get back to topic please.

Originally Posted by Guest

Some keep hoping she won't.
Living by the poll numbers is a losing game is it not.

This time of year in the 2008 race Clinton was viewd as the parties choice. She got knocked out of first place by a relatively unknown. I am sure it was not because the party need a black candidate before a female candidate.
And so for 2016 she has even more negative baggage and controversy and you all think she is invulnerable.

Why is that?

I do believe some dems greatest fear is that Fiorina runs. Defeats all the first woman POTUS BS.

Originally Posted by Guest

We've already discussed this ... the polls at this point are largely irrelevant. Try to get back to topic please.

At this point in 2008, there were only a handful of primary races remaining, and Barack Obama was well on his way to winning 30 states, while Hillary Clinton won 20 states. Clinton won all the big states like CA, FL, PA, OH, NY, but Obama just kept plugging away especially in the caucus states and came out the winner. Hopefully, the republican primary season will be as much fun to watch as that 2008 race was, which came right down to the wire.

It's funny how the polls are 'largely irrelevant', especially when the GOP's flavor of the day is polling at less than 1%. Pardon us if we don't pay too much attention to the group that assured us Romney would win in a landslide in 2012.

Originally Posted by Guest

At this point in 2008, there were only a handful of primary races remaining, and Barack Obama was well on his way to winning 30 states, while Hillary Clinton won 20 states. Clinton won all the big states like CA, FL, PA, OH, NY, but Obama just kept plugging away especially in the caucus states and came out the winner. Hopefully, the republican primary season will be as much fun to watch as that 2008 race was, which came right down to the wire.

It's funny how the polls are 'largely irrelevant', especially when the GOP's flavor of the day is polling at less than 1%. Pardon us if we don't pay too much attention to the group that assured us Romney would win in a landslide in 2012.

Originally Posted by Guest

You simply are unable to compare accomplishments for Carly and Hillary ... we get it.

Did Obama overtake and pass the frontrunner (Clinton)?

...and the candidate polling LESS than 1 percent is going to win nomination for President or VP.

Originally Posted by Guest

You simply are unable to compare accomplishments for Carly and Hillary ... we get it.

When Carly wins 20 primary states (like Hillary did in 2008), come back and we can talk.

Originally Posted by Guest

When Carly wins 20 primary states (like Hillary did in 2008), come back and we can talk.

You don't want to talk because you KNOW you can't reasonably compare accomplishments between Carly and Hillary. What a wuss.

Originally Posted by Guest

You don't want to talk because you KNOW you can't reasonably compare accomplishments between Carly and Hillary. What a wuss.

How about Hillary won two, count them two, elections to the senate compared to Carly's ten % point loss in her race for the senate.

Originally Posted by Guest

How about Hillary won two, count them two, elections to the senate compared to Carly's ten % point loss in her race for the senate.

Don't forget Hillary's greatest accomplishment to date ... she went from being "dead broke" to having an estimated net worth of $150-200M by virtue of running a charity. !! WTF??

Who could have guessed that running a charity would be enough to put her into the top 1%, of the top 1%?? That's pretty darn impressive, even by Clintonian standards of crime and theft.

Originally Posted by Guest

Don't forget Hillary's greatest accomplishment to date ... she went from being "dead broke" to having an estimated net worth of $150-200M by virtue of running a charity. !! WTF??

Who could have guessed that running a charity would be enough to put her into the top 1%, of the top 1%?? That's pretty darn impressive, even by Clintonian standards of crime and theft.

Heck, the failed 1/2 governor of Alaska went from nothing to being worth $12 million by virtue of being able to see Russia from her house and, of course, by making a fool of herself on Faux News..

That right there is pretty impressive for someone who had to go to 6 different colleges in five years

Originally Posted by Guest

Heck, the failed 1/2 governor of Alaska went from nothing to being worth $12 million by virtue of being able to see Russia from her house and, of course, by making a fool of herself on Faux News..

That right there is pretty impressive for someone who had to go to 6 different colleges in five years

So what is your point other than the usual badmouthing?
And if it was your daughter who accomplished that what would you have to say?
It is so easy to diss and snarl where there is no personal investment.