Originally Posted by Guest

Why? For knowing and speaking of facts?

You need to stop being a sensitive whiny woman.

Why do women deceive themselves so? You know I'm right, you just CAN'T bring yourself to agree. Like it's forbidden. Like sex and alcohol was when you were a teen...you wanted to, you may have done it, but you'd deny it in public. You're "Peter" with the truth. You know what it is, yet you deny it. Why? We've given up trying to figure you out, we just basically ignore you. You wonder WHY married men never hear you? You have NOTHING to say and if we sit there...maybe you'll go away.

Oh Snap!



Crazy as a loon CHI baby? I've yet to hear you or anyone shoot me down...exactly WHAT is untrue in what I said?

Informing people that the sitting president can in fact PARDON someone BEFORE they are indicted, is "crazy as a loon"? Obama can pardon her in advance of any charged being filed.

MOST of MY posts are informational.

What about yours?

I don't think you even begin to realize how far out in orbit you are ... some of your content is indeed informational ,but any effectiveness you may have in informing or persuading people is quickly overshadowed by the genuinely disturbed style of phraseology you typically employ. Wow

Your last post on Hillary's pardon, for example, is Exhibit A and the alphabet goes on from there.

Originally Posted by Guest

I don't think you even begin to realize how far out in orbit you are ... some of your content is indeed informational ,but any effectiveness you may have in informing or persuading people is quickly overshadowed by the genuinely disturbed style of phraseology you typically employ. Wow

Your last post on Hillary's pardon, for example, is Exhibit A and the alphabet goes on from there.

No stockade for her? Why not? IF she's guilty of all the things she's been accused of...she deserves it. As a woman, if you're squeamish...YOU DON'T HAVE TO GO. Just like my posts...if they offend you so...YOU DON'T HAVE TO READ THEM. You have no self control?

Originally Posted by Guest

No stockade for her? Why not? IF she's guilty of all the things she's been accused of...she deserves it. As a woman, if you're squeamish...YOU DON'T HAVE TO GO. Just like my posts...if they offend you so...YOU DON'T HAVE TO READ THEM. You have no self control?

This is actually one of the few times you've offered good advice... i.e. don't read your posts

But it's like seeing a train wreck belching oily smoke ... hard not to turn ones head to observe the immolation

Originally Posted by Guest

This is actually one of the few times you've offered good advice... i.e. don't read your posts

But it's like seeing a train wreck belching oily smoke ... hard not to turn ones head to observe the immolation

Ok lady...now...got anything to say about the topic? Everyone knows I'm hated by some for my thoughts. How about addressing the points made and not WHO made them.

What is that saying...Men talk about things and ideas, plans for the future, how to improve, invent...women talk about the men who talk about things and ideas, plans for the future, how to improve, invent.

Originally Posted by Guest

No one should pardon her. She is a criminal that is probably responsible for at least four American deaths. If so, then she should serve time for it. At the very least, she needs to be prosecuted and persecuted for her breaking the laws regarding handling of classified information. She should be prosecuted to the extent that anyone working under her would have been if they had handled classified as she did.

That said, if Obama pardons her then Trump will not have to be the bad guy that puts the bit*h in jail. So, as much as I want her to pay for what she did, if she is pardoned then Trump is off the hook for a campaign promise that he made to throw her in jail. It will be hard to find jurists that are willing to convict a Clinton. Their spawn of Satan royalty puts them in a semi-protected level above the average American citizen.e

Added after:

If she was to disappear or suddenly have a unrecoverable seizure, I would not mourn her in the slightest.

When oh when will we be attacked as a result of Hillary Clinton's handling of classified material? Will they attack while her friend Obama is in charge, or will they wait until her foe Trump is in charge? Please enlighten us.

Originally Posted by Guest

Ok lady...now...got anything to say about the topic? Everyone knows I'm hated by some for my thoughts. How about addressing the points made and not WHO made them.

What is that saying...Men talk about things and ideas, plans for the future, how to improve, invent...women talk about the men who talk about things and ideas, plans for the future, how to improve, invent.

1. I already said what I had to say earlier in the thread. Learn to read better

2. A man will tell you to your face ,.. you are genuinely disturbed.

3. I sincerely hope you don't have a Concealed Weapons License

Originally Posted by Guest

In all honesty, I think you genuinely need to find a good counselor, or maybe go all the way and call a psychiatrist.

Good post. OP is just one of those that just continues to stir the pot. You have to be reasonable to reason.

Originally Posted by Guest

When oh when will we be attacked as a result of Hillary Clinton's handling of classified material? Will they attack while her friend Obama is in charge, or will they wait until her foe Trump is in charge? Please enlighten us.

Hillary Clinton has been out of the State Department since 2012, four years. Why would the enemy that got hold of her classified material wait so long to act on it?

Originally Posted by janmcn

Hillary Clinton has been out of the State Department since 2012, four years. Why would the enemy that got hold of her classified material wait so long to act on it?

There could be countless reasons, unless you were trained in espionage and counter-espionage you could not comprehend the reasons.

Trump pull the plug on HRC

see new thread

Originally Posted by Guest

There could be countless reasons, unless you were trained in espionage and counter-espionage you could not comprehend the reasons.

So when the enemy finally acts of the info gathered, how will we know it is directly related to Hillary Clinton's emails?

Hillary broke several felony laws. She should not be above the law. She should be indicted and prosecuted. But, she should not be excused for violating national security.

I vote NO on a pardon.

Originally Posted by MDLNB

Hillary broke several felony laws. She should not be above the law. She should be indicted and prosecuted. But, she should not be excused for violating national security.

I vote NO on a pardon.

Try to stay current.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Guest

Try to stay current.

And take the chance that they will become completely impotent...when their little mad-on goes limp?

Not likely.

Originally Posted by Guest

And take the chance that they will become completely impotent...when their little mad-on goes limp?

Not likely.

CNM ... there you go again, projecting ...