Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   The Constitution and Religion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/constitution-religion-45964/)

Guest 12-27-2011 04:24 PM

Bucco, my friend, I would not have objections to a mosque being built nearby The Villages. It is NOT the object of Muslims - except for radical sects - to advocate killings. Of course, I would not stand for a mosque in the US that preached violence toward others. However, you would be hard pressed to find a mosque in the US like that. Of course, no one wants Sharia law in the US and US law takes precedence over that in all cases. You might find someone who does a crime under that guise, but they will be tried under US law for the crime - and rightfully so.

Just like you would be hard pressed to find a Christian sect that preaches violence - and they do exist in the US - I would steer clear of those, also.

I do agree with Richie and a few others who said they would feel uncomfortable if their favorite eateries would become filled with Muslims in their Near Eastern style clothing. I would not be afraid but am acclaimated to those who dress like me. It is human nature.

You do not see any ignorance or bigotry mentioned in the posts? The phrase used by one of the posters of "getting out Mr Colt" and not allowing Muslims to overpopulate the country' sure seems to be religious and cultural ignorance and bigotry - if not downright dangerously close to a threat to Muslims.

Guest 12-27-2011 04:41 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Wrong, but even if you were right, I for one will not except Sharia Law as some on here seem to want protection for. The formulation of our Constitution and judicial system certainly were guided by Christian beliefs and not some quirky religion that would kill you if you did not follow it to the letter. The Point is, if you have a faith different from Christianity, FINE, but it will not provide you with any benefits nor exceptions from US laws and customs. Worship whom you wish, but do not attempt to bring it into my life in any form. If you stone my wife because she wears a dress too short for your beliefs, I will not like that. If you stone your wife because she wears a dress too short and I find out about it, I will not like that either. I am confused why anyone would.


I don't need protection from Sharia Law...this is a made up Fox Noise issue. I trust the Supreme Court of the United States.

They may have been somewhat guided by Christian beliefs but this country was founded on religous freedom. I will follow my beliefs as you have the right to do also.

Guest 12-27-2011 04:56 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
To COLOGAL and BUGGYONE

I do not understand anything you two are preaching. NOBODY, not one person on there that I can find has found any fault with anyone practicing the rites of their religion in any way shape or form.

Everybody has been pretty clear that the promoting of death, killing, dismemberment, etc is the objection. The fact that there are segments of that religion, and it IS the majority and those who really practice it, DO, in fact condone it is the argument. The entire premise of the thread was a religion getting intertwined with our constitution.

I can only assume from what you two are saying is that it would be just fine if a mosque was nearby that promoted and advanced killings, etc. and it would be just fine because they have freedom of religion. I know others have pointed out the fact that we have laws in this country.

Thus I am not sure why you continue to call people on here names. IGNORANCE and BIGOTRY....I think not and I have not seen any justification for you to call people by those adjectives.

I HAVE NOT CALLED ANYONE A NAME....IN THIS THREAD. I am NOT afraid of Sharia law, I am afraid of terrorists however that does not make me afraid of all Muslims. It is fine to build a mosque however, you take this statement to another level.

So show me where I called anyone a bigot in this thread? If you can't then remove the post.

Guest 12-27-2011 04:57 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Let me say one last thing about this thread. I don't care what religion you practice or how you practice it as long as it don't interfer with my right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and my right to practice my religion without having to worry about you wanting to kill me for not believing the way YOU think I should. That will be when our two worlds collide and neither of us will be happy with the out come.

:agree:

Guest 12-27-2011 05:10 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
I HAVE NOT CALLED ANYONE A NAME....IN THIS THREAD. I am NOT afraid of Sharia law, I am afraid of terrorists however that does not make me afraid of all Muslims. It is fine to build a mosque however, you take this statement to another level.

So show me where I called anyone a bigot in this thread? If you can't then remove the post.


Quote:
Originally Posted by buggyone View Post
Cologal,

Try as one might, you cannot reason with bigotry - and that is exactly what most of this is - just plain ignorance and bigotry. FROM BUGGYONE



After several days...I must now agree with you. FROM COLOGAL

ps....I might add that the only thing folks have done is express their fear and concern for what appears to be a tenet of parts of this religion...a KNOWN AND STATED tenant, not like some of the assumed that have been posted. That fear and concern seems legitimate to me and because they feel that way should not be lumped into what BUGGYONE said and you agreed to. To me that is not bigotry !!!

Guest 12-27-2011 06:24 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Quote:
Originally Posted by buggyone View Post
Cologal,

Try as one might, you cannot reason with bigotry - and that is exactly what most of this is - just plain ignorance and bigotry. FROM BUGGYONE



After several days...I must now agree with you. FROM COLOGAL

ps....I might add that the only thing folks have done is express their fear and concern for what appears to be a tenet of parts of this religion...a KNOWN AND STATED tenant, not like some of the assumed that have been posted. That fear and concern seems legitimate to me and because they feel that way should not be lumped into what BUGGYONE said and you agreed to. To me that is not bigotry !!!

Bucco....I was addressing only Buggyone in this post. As I stated none of my responses to anyone included anything about being a BIGOT and that is what you accussed me of.

Yes these people are expressing fear and it maybe real to them....but to lump every Muslim into the same box is wrong.

I refuse to live my life in fear.. All my life some people have told me someone was coming to get me...The commies, the black panthers, the Jews. the gays....I could go on but the "They are going to me dejour" now are the Muslims. What do you say to George Tiller's wife a Christian" walked into a church on Sunday and shot him in the head. Should I fear Christian’s? Would it be a rational fear. Did the Germans fear the Jews... yes. Was what they did do that fear justifiable? No. Any group should not be targeted due to the actions of a few.

Guest 12-27-2011 06:46 PM

djp, from your #158:

"Just as I will not lump all Christians in with the senior Catholic heirarchy who, by their actions, condone child rape, I will not do the same of all Muslims."

To be consistent with the other examples in your post you should amend the very first line (quoted above) to reflect reality by inserting the words 'some of' then your statement will be qualified as you did all the others. Hence restated with qualifiers:

Just as I will not lump all Christians in with 'some of' the senior Catholic heirarchy who, by their actions, condone child rape, I will not do the same of all Muslims.

That makes it more consistent with the others and so much more accurate!

btk

Guest 12-27-2011 06:58 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 432957)
I don't see this as a politically correct thing....but you conservatives continue to label everything and everyone into a box of your design. I greet my Christian friends with Merry Christmas and my Jewish friends with Happy Hanukkah however if I don't know a persons religion then I say Happy Holidays. I am trying to be religiously sensitive...not a bad thing to be.

I guess I know the people around me at work enough to know exactlly what it is that they are all celebrating. Not labelling, just caring enough to actually know them...that is the brand of sensitivity that we practice in my neck of the woods.

Guest 12-27-2011 07:14 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Bucco....I was addressing only Buggyone in this post. As I stated none of my responses to anyone included anything about being a BIGOT and that is what you accussed me of.

Yes these people are expressing fear and it maybe real to them....but to lump every Muslim into the same box is wrong.

I refuse to live my life in fear.. All my life some people have told me someone was coming to get me...The commies, the black panthers, the Jews. the gays....I could go on but the "They are going to me dejour" now are the Muslims. What do you say to George Tiller's wife a Christian" walked into a church on Sunday and shot him in the head. Should I fear Christian’s? Would it be a rational fear. Did the Germans fear the Jews... yes. Was what they did do that fear justifiable? No. Any group should not be targeted due to the actions of a few.

"Bucco....I was addressing only Buggyone in this post. As I stated none of my responses to anyone included anything about being a BIGOT and that is what you accussed me of."

First, this is a public forum. You cannot address ONLY one person except in a PM.

I accused you of nothing except agreeing that most of the posts or comments were bigotry...period..thats it.

"Yes these people are expressing fear and it maybe real to them....but to lump every Muslim into the same box is wrong."

In my opinion and I suppose only my opinion, folks on here had no problem with anyone practicing their religion, UNLESS it interfered with they was THEY lived their life, which includes fear for your life. Sure, much of it, and I sure am guilty I am sure is ignorance of the religion, but it DOES IN FACT preach what folks on here have mentioned as something they fear. Those radical groups you seem to just shrug off have said publicly they will kill us...they have said they will infiltrate us from within (how long did the 9/11 bombers spend here living quietly) I hear VERY VERY little in the way of folks who live here of the Muslim faith saying anything to rebutt it.
This is NOW....REAL LIFE...not historical debate items.

"I refuse to live my life in fear.. All my life some people have told me someone was coming to get me...The commies, the black panthers, the Jews. the gays....I could go on but the "They are going to me dejour" now are the Muslims. What do you say to George Tiller's wife a Christian" walked into a church on Sunday and shot him in the head. Should I fear Christian’s? Would it be a rational fear. Did the Germans fear the Jews... yes. Was what they did do that fear justifiable? No. Any group should not be targeted due to the actions of a few."


This is nothing but political correctness rambling. WHO ever said you should live your life in fear...the subject of the thread was allowing a religious belief interfere with our constitution.

The "commies" are nothing but a political party and any strength they may have had is historical....you should fear the Black Panthers where they are strong, but at this point their threat is a very local one...never heard of the Jews or Gays openly threatening our county AS MANY...AND remember it IS MANY...of the muslim religion has done.

The individual stuff you mention is simply trash talk. My point was and still is.......this group...a very large and most probably a majority of this religion has vowed to kill you, your children and your grandchildren and bring your country to its knees. Being cautious and aware is not bigotry unless there is no basis for that, and in this case there is strong and clear threats, etc to establish a very good basis for that caution and fear.

and by the way, you refer to "you conservatives" as if it were a condition. Let me tell you, get out more...if you think this fear is a conservative trait, you are really out of touch.

Guest 12-27-2011 07:23 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
"Bucco....I was addressing only Buggyone in this post. As I stated none of my responses to anyone included anything about being a BIGOT and that is what you accussed me of."

First, this is a public forum. You cannot address ONLY one person except in a PM.

I accused you of nothing except agreeing that most of the posts or comments were bigotry...period..thats it.

"Yes these people are expressing fear and it maybe real to them....but to lump every Muslim into the same box is wrong."

In my opinion and I suppose only my opinion, folks on here had no problem with anyone practicing their religion, UNLESS it interfered with they was THEY lived their life, which includes fear for your life. Sure, much of it, and I sure am guilty I am sure is ignorance of the religion, but it DOES IN FACT preach what folks on here have mentioned as something they fear. Those radical groups you seem to just shrug off have said publicly they will kill us...they have said they will infiltrate us from within (how long did the 9/11 bombers spend here living quietly) I hear VERY VERY little in the way of folks who live here of the Muslim faith saying anything to rebutt it.
This is NOW....REAL LIFE...not historical debate items.

"I refuse to live my life in fear.. All my life some people have told me someone was coming to get me...The commies, the black panthers, the Jews. the gays....I could go on but the "They are going to me dejour" now are the Muslims. What do you say to George Tiller's wife a Christian" walked into a church on Sunday and shot him in the head. Should I fear Christian’s? Would it be a rational fear. Did the Germans fear the Jews... yes. Was what they did do that fear justifiable? No. Any group should not be targeted due to the actions of a few."


This is nothing but political correctness rambling. WHO ever said you should live your life in fear...the subject of the thread was allowing a religious belief interfere with our constitution.

The "commies" are nothing but a political party and any strength they may have had is historical....you should fear the Black Panthers where they are strong, but at this point their threat is a very local one...never heard of the Jews or Gays openly threatening our county AS MANY...AND remember it IS MANY...of the muslim religion has done.

The individual stuff you mention is simply trash talk. My point was and still is.......this group...a very large and most probably a majority of this religion has vowed to kill you, your children and your grandchildren and bring your country to its knees. Being cautious and aware is not bigotry unless there is no basis for that, and in this case there is strong and clear threats, etc to establish a very good basis for that caution and fear.

and by the way, you refer to "you conservatives" as if it were a condition. Let me tell you, get out more...if you think this fear is a conservative trait, you are really out of touch.

If I thought this post deserved an answer I would answer it..but a rant? NAH!

Guest 12-27-2011 07:41 PM

..."You do not see any ignorance or bigotry mentioned in the posts? The phrase used by one of the posters of "getting out Mr Colt" and not allowing Muslims to overpopulate the country" sure seems to be religious and cultural ignorance and bigotry - if not downright dangerously close to a threat to the lives of Muslims. I have repeated this posting by one of the regular posters and it has drawn not a single reply. Are you agreeing with the idea of this?

Guest 12-27-2011 07:58 PM

Thank you, Bucco for your latest post.

And regarding this mockery/quote by "cologal".....

Quote:

"I don't need protection from Sharia Law...this is a made up Fox Noise issue..."
The following two links are enlightening:

Sharia's Encroachment into American Courts

Quote:

......."Under U.S. law, child custody cases follow the legal standard of "the best interests of the child." This can mean joint custody of children by both parents, full custody solely by the mother or father, or, if both parents are unfit, custody by relatives or guardians. Under sharia or Islamic doctrine, however, fathers receive sole custody when children reach seven years of age, regardless of family circumstances.

That's exactly how Hosain v. Malik was decided in 1996 when an American court in Maryland awarded full custody of a daughter to her father, enforcing a court order from Pakistan, an Islamic country that follows sharia law. Although the mother in the custody battle was never deemed unfit and the daughter was actually afraid of her father, an alleged substance abuser and batterer, the U.S. court enforced sharia requirements. Further, the child's attorney was not present at the custody decision to advocate for the child, and no input was sought from the daughter, as is standard in U.S. custody cases.

In the Hosain v. Malik case, the husband's attorney cleverly twisted the "best interest of the child" requirement and argued that in Pakistani culture, the well-being of the child is facilitated by adherence to Islamic teaching, which mandates custody to the father. In this case, the child was sent back to Pakistan with the father, violating the child's human rights to enjoy a relationship with her mother and violating the mother's rights as a woman. Further, the father accused his ex-wife of adultery, which meant that if she returned to Pakistan she could face imprisonment, lashing, or even death by stoning under sharia".....
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/...an_courts.html

And here:

Shariah Law and American State Courts: An Assessment of State Appellate Court Cases

Quote:

"The Center for Security Policy’s report, Shariah Law and American State Courts: An Assessment of State Appellate Court Cases evaluates 50 Appellate Court cases from 23 states that involve conflicts between Shariah (Islamic law) and American state law.

These cases are the stories of Muslim American families, mostly Muslim women and children, who were asking American courts to preserve their rights to equal protection and due process. These families came to America for freedom from the discriminatory and cruel laws of Shariah. When our courts then apply Shariah law in the lives of these families, and deny them equal protection, they are betraying the principles on which America was founded.

The study’s findings suggest that Shariah law has entered into state court decisions, in conflict with the Constitution and state public policy. Some commentators have said there are no more than one or two cases of Shariah law in U.S. state court cases; yet we found 50 significant cases just from the small sample of appellate published cases.

Others have asserted with certainty that state court judges will always reject any foreign law, including Shariah law, when it conflicts with the Constitution or state public policy; yet we found 15 Trial Court cases, and 12 Appellate Court cases, where Shariah was found to be applicable in these particular cases. The facts are the facts: some judges are making decisions deferring to Shariah law even when those decisions conflict with Constitutional protections.
.....

Read more:
http://shariahinamericancourts.com/

Guest 12-27-2011 08:00 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Thank you, Bucco for your latest post.

And regarding this mockery/quote by "cologal".....



The following two links are enlightening:

Sharia's Encroachment into American Courts



Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/...an_courts.html

And here:

Shariah Law and American State Courts: An Assessment of State Appellate Court Cases

.....

Read more:
http://shariahinamericancourts.com/

So to prove the point you use only ultra conservative links....Right!

Guest 12-27-2011 08:10 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
So to prove the point you use only ultra conservative links....Right!

View the actual cases here. They speak for themselves.

http://shariahinamericancourts.com/?page_id=305

Guest 12-27-2011 08:18 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
djp, from your #158:

"Just as I will not lump all Christians in with the senior Catholic heirarchy who, by their actions, condone child rape, I will not do the same of all Muslims."

To be consistent with the other examples in your post you should amend the very first line (quoted above) to reflect reality by inserting the words 'some of' then your statement will be qualified as you did all the others. Hence restated with qualifiers:

Just as I will not lump all Christians in with 'some of' the senior Catholic heirarchy who, by their actions, condone child rape, I will not do the same of all Muslims.

That makes it more consistent with the others and so much more accurate!

btk

You're correct, I should have said it that way. I didn't because I keep thinking of how the very top of the heirarchy, the Pope himself, aided in the conspiracy - and the sheltering of Cardinal Law just as he was about to be subpoenaed by the Boston Police Department. Sometimes that red button of mine is a little more visible. There are many people, especially some of the priests I knew, who ARE examples of what I think of as the best of Christianity.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.