Originally Posted by Guest

Coming from an ignorant, lying, putrid & flaming racist like yourself, who loves using the 'N' word, as well as the crass 'C' word...you are beneath any decent persons extended discourse.

Why do liberals forbid certain words for me but allow others to use them? Why do liberals not allow differing opinions? Anything that disagrees with you must be silenced...not discussed.

Why is that with liberals?

Originally Posted by Guest

Any American president that wants "better" relations with the Russian bear should be tried for treason and SHOT. **** the Russians !

Stop believing the government propaganda. Russia saved us from Germany, they were the "heroes" of WWII, not the other way around. The government needs an enemy, so they have a reason to spend money. If they don't have a real enemy, they'll create one.

Originally Posted by Guest

In my view Trump sometimes gets himself unwanted press. Take for instance his comments about "Celebrity Apprentice" at the prayer breakfast which he should have never brought to light. However he did, and since he did, he didn't have to insult Mark Burnett or Arnold. He could have simply stated he left that show with good ratings.

The MSM jumped on his comments for all they were worth they smelled blood and when it comes to Trump these vampires swarm like a colony of bees for the kill.. Perhaps that was his intent all along

Now for the rest of the story. The MSM never talked about the loving comments he made about his visit to the family of the recently killed Navy Seal. The MSM never talked about his long discussion about the importance of prayer nor that the most common remark he heard as he made his travels "we are praying for you". Nor did the MSM comment that Trump made a commitment to preserve and protect our Christian faith. No why not because talking of christian faith to the MSM is like flashing a cross in front of their face and we know
what happens when a vampire's face is hit by a cross.

PS The Russia got Trump his win mantra has as much credibility as the Obama "birther"issue

Personal Best Regards:

I saw all items you said was never covered on MSM.

Where do you go for news ?

Originally Posted by RacistBoyBaldwin

Why do liberals forbid certain words for me but allow others to use them? Why do liberals not allow differing opinions? Anything that disagrees with you must be silenced...not discussed.

Why is that with liberals?

It has absolutely nothing to do with political party, as there even a few decent people on the right...that also know you're a rancid POS.

"Discussing" putrid and disgusting racism/bigotry/misogyny, with a lowlife POS who is deathly afraid of minorities, is best left to professionals...not on a political forum.

Originally Posted by Guest

I saw all items you said was never covered on MSM.

Where do you go for news ?

RubiTHECon doesn't look at, or for, real news as he is already armed with his preaching soapbox and pseudo-intellectual personality...so he already knows everything.

Originally Posted by Guest

Agree, nonetheless Trump is the worse candidate the Republicans didn't want as a nominee.

And yet, he won. You just made Hillary a worst loser.

Originally Posted by Guest

It has absolutely nothing to do with political party, as there even a few decent people on the right...that also know you're a rancid POS.

"Discussing" putrid and disgusting racism/bigotry/misogyny, with a lowlife POS who is deathly afraid of minorities, is best left to professionals...not on a political forum.

Well said. I am getting away from the Political Forum a lot more now because it seems pointless to argue with these people. They do not research much of anything and just come on here to vent their hatred of the day or week year or in some case's life.

Originally Posted by Guest

The communist lover trump is paying back putin for his electoral college win. It's only the start, the russians have evidence on him.

Hello again disgruntled Progressive one.

If you do not want to be annoyed by the predominantly Republican voting populace here in The Villages, perhaps consider moving to Tampa. The Tampa Bay Times is left leaning. It is easy to sell your home here and make a profit and go live among others more attuned to your ideas.

Also. You could enroll at U.C. Berkeley.

G.G.

Originally Posted by Guest

Hello again disgruntled Progressive one.

If you do not want to be annoyed by the predominantly Republican voting populace here in The Villages, perhaps consider moving to Tampa. The Tampa Bay Times is left leaning. It is easy to sell your home here and make a profit and go live among others more attuned to your ideas.

Also. You could enroll at U.C. Berkeley.

G.G.

perhaps some day this forum will become adult enough to discuss world and national issues.

I am tired of hearing about The Villages being whatever you think The Villages is.

Telling someone to move because they do not like a poster who continually trolls on here just does not make any sense. Lets upgrade and talk about what is happening in the world instead of the constant and always non ending labels and then trash.

I know many fine wonderful Liberals, progressive, conservative etc and they are wonderful people ALL of them, and I will never stoop so low as to put them all in one basket and condemn them.

This conversation always happens about one single poster...and sadly he is a troll...his message is always....I hate liberals, I hate the media, occassionaly a little race jab. NOTHING MORE....he has never discussed the dying in Syria....the ties to Russia with our government...the Russian/Iran ties.....the budget deficit and on going spending...how to replace Obama care.

This troll accuses me and others of following him. I submit I answer most posts made to ME troll or not. I assume if you support this one, you also support the trolls on here who preach how supreme someone is because they are white....or the poster who feels someone should be subject to mens rule, etc. Gotta tell you.....I am certainly not above the fray...I am wrong as much as I am right, but the judgements you and he make on people in such a general way is flat out scary.

Listening you to defend him and listening to him, you would think we should all turn in our registration cards so that all registered Democrats could wear a sign saying....DUMB, TERRIBLE, EVIL and all Republicans could wear a sign saying....SMART, GOOD PERSON AND ALWAYS RIGHT.

You will condemn people trashing others and then come on here and do it to millions of people with one sentence...all to defend one single poster who whether he believes it or not, is a troll by every definition.

Originally Posted by Guest

Any American president that wants "better" relations with the Russian bear should be tried for treason and SHOT. **** the Russians !

Does it have to be a "president" or can it be a Secstate working for a president? SecState Killary did a reset button with Russia while working for Obama, and she did authorize the sale of 20% of the world's nuclear fuel to Russia. Does that count?

Originally Posted by Guest

Does it have to be a "president" or can it be a Secstate working for a president? SecState Killary did a reset button with Russia while working for Obama, and she did authorize the sale of 20% of the world's nuclear fuel to Russia. Does that count?

Another phoney tale from the campaign...

The facts behind Trump’s repeated claim about Hillary Clinton’s role in the Russian uranium deal - The Washington Post

Read this and note...

"Hillary Clinton’s involvement with a Russian uranium deal has come under scrutiny since author and Breitbart News senior editor-at-large Peter Schweizer dedicated a chapter to the topic in his 2015 book, “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.”

The Trump campaign has been attacking Clinton over the uranium deal lately, perhaps as a way to distract attention from criticism of Trump’s interest in fostering a closer relationship with Russia. “Clinton Cash” was made into a graphic novel and a documentary, and on Oct. 20, makers of the graphic novel released an animated ad about the uranium deal. FactCheck.org and PolitiFact have covered the facts, and we wrote about the deal briefly in a speech roundup. But with the renewed attention this month, we decided to take a deeper look at Clinton’s role in this deal.

This is certainly not an endoresement of Clinton but simply pointing out that you have to verify what these people (on both sides tell you)......this a campaign crappola

Originally Posted by Guest

Another phoney tale from the campaign...

The facts behind Trump’s repeated claim about Hillary Clinton’s role in the Russian uranium deal - The Washington Post

Read this and note...

"Hillary Clinton’s involvement with a Russian uranium deal has come under scrutiny since author and Breitbart News senior editor-at-large Peter Schweizer dedicated a chapter to the topic in his 2015 book, “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.”

The Trump campaign has been attacking Clinton over the uranium deal lately, perhaps as a way to distract attention from criticism of Trump’s interest in fostering a closer relationship with Russia. “Clinton Cash” was made into a graphic novel and a documentary, and on Oct. 20, makers of the graphic novel released an animated ad about the uranium deal. FactCheck.org and PolitiFact have covered the facts, and we wrote about the deal briefly in a speech roundup. But with the renewed attention this month, we decided to take a deeper look at Clinton’s role in this deal.

This is certainly not an endoresement of Clinton but simply pointing out that you have to verify what these people (on both sides tell you)......this a campaign crappola

It's not phony. Hillary had a vote (approval or disapproval) on the sale. She approved it. Funny how the Clinton foundation also received a large donation.

The liberal Post can twist it any way they wish.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...pany.html?_r=0

The point is that if you wish to suggest that Trump is buddy-buddy with Putin, you have just as much if not more reason to suggest the same about Hillary and even Obama. After all, Obama told Russia that he would be able to do more with them AFTER the election. So, rather than make up silly accusations about Putin and Trump, why not use some real facts to criticize him with?

Originally Posted by Guest

It isn't his physical health that's at issue.

It will be his mental health of not being able to handle criticism and potential prosecution for conflicts of interest...that will make him quit.

In less than two weeks, he's already blaming his diatribe and disrespect against one of our staunchest allies (Australia) on... "it was a long day."

WTF did the idiot expect?

He's not a king.

He's not a dictator.

He's not a CEO that owns this country.

He can't just bark...and everyone jumps.

BUT...he's not even smart enough to know that.

When he uses a Prayer Breakfast to denigrate the person that took over his semi-reality show...you have someone who is literally unhinged and on the edge.

Just like a whole lot of his cultists.