Originally Posted by KatzPajamas

1-Racism? I thought that his mother was white, plus he was raised by his white grandparents...
2-Barry Soetoro, Barak Obama, Barak Hussein Obama,...Looks like this guy uses the name that he thinks best suits his needs at the time. Could it be that he let the "Hussein" cat out of the bag with a purpose that best suited his needs?

Yes. For occasions such as this:

"The Obama administration is set to begin formal contacts with the Muslim Brotherhood, a group dedicated in its own words to “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within, and sabotaging its miserable house.”

This news came in a Reuters report Wednesday, quoting a “senior U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.”
Why this official felt it necessary to speak on condition of anonymity is a mystery, given the fact that Barack Obama has never made a secret of his solicitude for the Muslim Brotherhood. Even though the Brotherhood was still outlawed in Egypt at that time, he made a point of inviting leaders of the group to attend his speech to the Islamic world in Cairo on June 4, 2009.

Not only that. Obama included the leader of a Muslim Brotherhood-linked group that had been named an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case among the clerics giving a prayer during his inauguration ceremonies: Ingrid Mattson, then-president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), offered this prayer at the National Cathedral on Obama’s Inauguration Day – despite the fact that ISNA has admitted its ties to the Brotherhood. In fact, so overwhelming is the evidence of ISNA’s involvement with the Brotherhood and Hamas that the previous summer, federal prosecutors had rejected a request from ISNA to remove its unindicted co-conspirator status. Obama even sent his Senior Adviser Valerie Jarrett to be the keynote speaker at ISNA’s national convention in 2009......"

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/07/04/o...m-brotherhood/

bye

Originally Posted by The Villager II

Does anyone have any idea what this post was originally about?

Sure; it was a childish question about who was the dumber between 2 Republican candidates for president. As that silly question couldn't generate much thoughtful repartee, the discussion naturally shifted to other more interesting points of discussion; much like what happens at your kitchen table or the corner table at the local bar.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Sure; it was a childish question about who was the dumber between 2 Republican candidates for president. As that silly question couldn't generate much thoughtful repartee, the discussion naturally shifted to other more interesting points of discussion; much like what happens at your kitchen table or the corner table at the local bar.

But any question can cause you to throw insults. You should be ashamed of what you post on this web site.
You are now blocked from me seeing anything you say just at Admin recommended. Good riddance

Originally Posted by The Villager II

But any question can cause you to throw insults. You should be ashamed of what you post on this web site.
You are now blocked from me seeing anything you say just at Admin recommended. Good riddance

Richie is one of the best posters here and he was right about this silly title to this thread. How are we to have serious discussions when it starts off on the wrong foot with a title? OK. You going to block me too?

Originally Posted by The Villager II

Does anyone have any idea what this post was originally about?

"The dummy does it again"

Originally Posted by villagegolfer

"The dummy does it again"

Good bye

You asked, I told you. This is your thread. That was your title. Please do not get mad at me.

I responded in another thread before I saw this one. Villager II is enraged because I classified his question of "Which of these 2 candidates is dumber?" as childish. This is a non-forgivable insult? OK; whatever.