FBI Has Had Informant Working With Trump FBI Has Had Informant Working With Trump - Page 5 - Talk of The Villages Florida

FBI Has Had Informant Working With Trump

 
Thread Tools
  #61  
Old 06-04-2017, 07:24 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Comey knows that the FBI is ill-suited to get to the bottom of their investigation of Trump’s Russia connections because their handling of Sater would be exposed. If backed into corner Comey will have no other choice then to tell everyone a "mole" has been next to Trump for years. Soon the news will comes out that Trump's entire empire is based on laundered money from Russia. This is why you see Trump doing all he can to help Russia in every way. From ending the embargo against them to giving them back their New York property ceased by the FBI under the order of Obama. Watch the short 1:35 second video below and ask yourself, does he act like a man that is innocent?

BBC Panorama 2017 Trump, Felix Sater - YouTube

Washington Monthly | Trump, Felix Sater, and the FBI
All Obama appointee's are moles. Fateful ONLY to the Democratic liberal agenda, which most career department heads are Democrat Moles put in place by nepotism, buddy buddy system that's been in place for 50 years or more. Some call it networking, but I call it Nepotism.
  #62  
Old 06-04-2017, 07:25 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
All Obama appointee's are moles. Fateful ONLY to the Democratic liberal agenda, which most career department heads are Democrat Moles put in place by nepotism, buddy buddy system that's been in place for 50 years or more. Some call it networking, but I call it Nepotism.
I see and what about the Trumps?
  #63  
Old 06-04-2017, 07:55 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wackadoodle View Post
I see and what about the Trumps?
Trump's what?



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
  #64  
Old 06-04-2017, 09:23 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MDLNB View Post
Says the guy that uses "Masterba...." in his comments.

Sincere, my rectum. :a20"
Thanks for the idea for a new word....
Recturbate. An a-hole reprobate. And so many chances to use it in a sentence on this forum .






Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
  #65  
Old 06-04-2017, 09:25 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Allegiance View Post
Bing bing bing. Wrong answer. You are scum and it's unanimous. GC is the most liked. The poll has closed.

Go home, see you after the midterms. Lol
Who's GC?

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
  #66  
Old 06-04-2017, 10:45 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Poster, perhaps you are right? However what the Trump-Russia scenario amounts to right now is speculation, innuendo and political intrigue and no smoking gun .

However let's switch to something more concrete. It is a fact that Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch secretly met on an airport tarmac.

It is a fact that all government planes are equipped with recording equipment that cannot be dismantled.

It is a fact that at the time of Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch meeting the Department of Justice was suppose to be investigating Hillary's Clinton's e-mail scandal.

it is a fact that both Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch claimed they only spoke about grand kids , golf .

It is a fact that the NSA refused Judicial Watch's request for all documents relating to that meeting based a concern for national security.

What national secret could there be concerning Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch's grand kids?

And why was Loretta Lynch not brought up on charges of an obvious conflict of interest.

Their meeting on its face was illegal because her Department was investigating Hillary Clinton's alleged criminal activity

Oh yea since DOJ refused to commit James Comey stepped up and declared Hillary stupid but not a criminal

Personal best Regards;
Loretta Lynch has NO children therefore she has NO grandchildren .
In 2007 she married her current husband . His 2 children were grown and out on their own . Yes, perhaps her current husband has a couple of grandchildren .
So her end of that conversation must have gone something like this : " Hey Bill my second husband`s grown kids have a couple of kids . I met them a few times . Let me brag on them for ya " .
  #67  
Old 06-04-2017, 10:49 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Dear (Personal Best Regards/nee ?)

Imitating someone is the most sincere sign of flattery and envy. Thank you.

1) I didn't deflect. Its a progressive tactic to claim deflection to deflect away from the progressives actual attempts to deflect.

2) The deflection really is the progressives with a serious case of Trump Derangement Syndrome who are committing a very dangerous game of deflection to hamper Trump's agenda with all this Russian nonsense.

3) I asked why the progressive hypocrisy continues given the last 8 Obama years of criminal activity, constitutional breaches, scandals and failed polices? All of which where so obvious they could have been successfully prosecuted by an amateur prosecutor

4) you speak of Trump people's business relationship to Russia, and yet you conveniently ignore Obama, Clinton and God knows how many more Obama officials that had dealing with Russia. But the coup de'tat is the televised faux pas of Obama speaking sotto voce", thinking the mic was off, to Putin's flunky "I'll have more flexibility after the election"

There are only two words to describe the emotional and hysterical state of the so called progressive resistance (actually obstruction) and that is SAD AND PATHETIC ...and it is getting tiresome and boring

Personal Best Regards: (Rubicon)
The only one tiresome and boring is you. You are still deflecting and apparently don't even realize it - when you try to turn a discussion about Trump into a sidetrack about Obama, that's called deflecting. I know you can't help yourself. Many of you were duped by Trump and his grandiose promises. Now that there is alll this potential criminal activity of his administration coming out to the point that a special investigator has been appointed, it must be hard to swallow. It's okay. You can admit you were wrong and we won't think any less of you than we already do.
  #68  
Old 06-04-2017, 12:32 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
The only one tiresome and boring is you. You are still deflecting and apparently don't even realize it - when you try to turn a discussion about Trump into a sidetrack about Obama, that's called deflecting. I know you can't help yourself. Many of you were duped by Trump and his grandiose promises. Now that there is alll this potential criminal activity of his administration coming out to the point that a special investigator has been appointed, it must be hard to swallow. It's okay. You can admit you were wrong and we won't think any less of you than we already do.
Forgetting who was wrong, etc., thanks for this post.

These folks who respond to a criticism of Trump with a tirade about Obama and/or Clinton, also then say that all should discuss issues. It is frustrating especially because..

Our President and his team are under investigation and already 3 justice department employees investigating the President have been fired (in less than 5 months).....

That is a HUGE issue
  #69  
Old 06-04-2017, 12:32 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
The only one tiresome and boring is you. You are still deflecting and apparently don't even realize it - when you try to turn a discussion about Trump into a sidetrack about Obama, that's called deflecting. I know you can't help yourself. Many of you were duped by Trump and his grandiose promises. Now that there is alll this potential criminal activity of his administration coming out to the point that a special investigator has been appointed, it must be hard to swallow. It's okay. You can admit you were wrong and we won't think any less of you than we already do.

Dear Poster:

As to your aforementioned response. Apparently you can't, won't, don't read, nor do you wish to discuss issues.

Did you not understand what I referenced as to progressives deflecting trick to deflect their deflections?

P. S. A special prosecutor was appointed to drag out the fake stories about Trump-Putin in an attempt to slow the Trump agenda down.

Personally I have no affection for Trump but I like his ideas and I like that he does not kowtow to anyone...a common aliment in Washington and the reason it is such a cesspool.

When someone credible in Washington presents a "smoking gun" that ties in the alleged Trump-Putin story I will be the first to demand Trump testify under oath. I am an equal opportunity critic be it a Republican , Democrat or a Libertarian . However, I reject communism, socialism and its sister party, the Green Party

Personal Best Regards:
  #70  
Old 06-04-2017, 01:07 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Dear Poster:

As to your aforementioned response. Apparently you can't, won't, don't read, nor do you wish to discuss issues.

Did you not understand what I referenced as to progressives deflecting trick to deflect their deflections?

P. S. A special prosecutor was appointed to drag out the fake stories about Trump-Putin in an attempt to slow the Trump agenda down.

Personally I have no affection for Trump but I like his ideas and I like that he does not kowtow to anyone...a common aliment in Washington and the reason it is such a cesspool.

When someone credible in Washington presents a "smoking gun" that ties in the alleged Trump-Putin story I will be the first to demand Trump testify under oath. I am an equal opportunity critic be it a Republican , Democrat or a Libertarian . However, I reject communism, socialism and its sister party, the Green Party

Personal Best Regards:
You are unable to discuss issues intelligently because you refuse to accept facts. Sessions has had to recuse himself, Flynn has been found to lie about Russian connections and working for foreign governments, Kushner lied about Russian connections, and Trump fired Comey who was leading the Russia investigation. In addition Comey has said that Trump asked him to back off the probe. These are smoking guns and the reason an independent counsel was appointed. To claim that Mueller has an agenda and is just trying to "slow things down" is laughable and there is no basis in fact for that. I will not respond to any more of your post because they are a waste of my time. If anybody has real issues based on facts that they would like to discuss that might be interesting. Sorry but you just don't fill the bill.
  #71  
Old 06-04-2017, 02:57 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
You are unable to discuss issues intelligently because you refuse to accept facts. Sessions has had to recuse himself, Flynn has been found to lie about Russian connections and working for foreign governments, Kushner lied about Russian connections, and Trump fired Comey who was leading the Russia investigation. In addition Comey has said that Trump asked him to back off the probe. These are smoking guns and the reason an independent counsel was appointed. To claim that Mueller has an agenda and is just trying to "slow things down" is laughable and there is no basis in fact for that. I will not respond to any more of your post because they are a waste of my time. If anybody has real issues based on facts that they would like to discuss that might be interesting.

Sorry but you just don't fill the bill.



  #72  
Old 06-04-2017, 04:22 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Dear Poster:

As to your aforementioned response. Apparently you can't, won't, don't read, nor do you wish to discuss issues.

Did you not understand what I referenced as to progressives deflecting trick to deflect their deflections?

P. S. A special prosecutor was appointed to drag out the fake stories about Trump-Putin in an attempt to slow the Trump agenda down.

Personally I have no affection for Trump but I like his ideas and I like that he does not kowtow to anyone...a common aliment in Washington and the reason it is such a cesspool.

When someone credible in Washington presents a "smoking gun" that ties in the alleged Trump-Putin story I will be the first to demand Trump testify under oath. I am an equal opportunity critic be it a Republican , Democrat or a Libertarian . However, I reject communism, socialism and its sister party, the Green Party

Personal Best Regards:
PLEASE SUPPLY LINKS, COPY AND PASTE ANYTHING TO GIVE SOME CREDIBILITY TO YOUR CONSTANT AND ONGOING CLAIM OF

FAKE STORIES

PLEASE....

And as to you seeing a smoking gun......this is an investigation and I suppose as a good buddy of our President you get updates, huh......IT IS AN INVESTIGATION...no smoking guns will be told.

Maybe nothing to this....maybe so....THREE people have lost their jobs because they investigated thus far so something needs to be covered.
  #73  
Old 06-04-2017, 04:28 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

"In the early confusion of Saturday's attack in London, as police urged people not to spread rumors, those world leaders who did speak out early were largely circumspect. Restrained. Sympathetic.

“My thoughts go out to the victims and their loved ones,” French President Emmanuel Macron said on Twitter. “Awful news,” wrote Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau the same evening, adding, “We're monitoring the situation.”

And then there was President Trump.

Before London police or anyone else had announced that the attack was linked to terrorism — the president of the United States retweeted an unsourced blurb from Drudge.com: “Fears of new terror attack after van 'mows down 20 people' on London Bridge.”


Fifteen minutes after that tweet, he did a commerical for his travel ban.

The Mayor of London then asked for everyone to stay calm..well this is what he said...

"Khan also told Londoners to expect a heavy police presence in the days ahead. “No need to be alarmed,” he said. “One of the things the police, all of us, need to do is make sure we're as safe as we possibly can be.”


The sensitive leader of our country then tweeted, and remember all....these are tweets from the President of the United States...he is speaking for you.....

"At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack and Mayor of London says there is "no reason to be alarmed!"
7:31 AM - 4 Jun 2017"


I have seen at least 3 editorials saying how embarrased they are for our country.

Trump addresses London attack by tweeting about gun control, travel ban - The Washington Post
  #74  
Old 06-04-2017, 04:48 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
"In the early confusion of Saturday's attack in London, as police urged people not to spread rumors, those world leaders who did speak out early were largely circumspect. Restrained. Sympathetic.

“My thoughts go out to the victims and their loved ones,” French President Emmanuel Macron said on Twitter. “Awful news,” wrote Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau the same evening, adding, “We're monitoring the situation.”

And then there was President Trump.

Before London police or anyone else had announced that the attack was linked to terrorism — the president of the United States retweeted an unsourced blurb from Drudge.com: “Fears of new terror attack after van 'mows down 20 people' on London Bridge.”


Fifteen minutes after that tweet, he did a commerical for his travel ban.

The Mayor of London then asked for everyone to stay calm..well this is what he said...

"Khan also told Londoners to expect a heavy police presence in the days ahead. “No need to be alarmed,” he said. “One of the things the police, all of us, need to do is make sure we're as safe as we possibly can be.”


The sensitive leader of our country then tweeted, and remember all....these are tweets from the President of the United States...he is speaking for you.....

"At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack and Mayor of London says there is "no reason to be alarmed!"
7:31 AM - 4 Jun 2017"


I have seen at least 3 editorials saying how embarrased they are for our country.


Trump addresses London attack by tweeting about gun control, travel ban - The Washington Post
I'm not sure which is worse, that the President Of The United States is such an embarrassing jerk...or that so many 'supposed' American citizens don't care.
  #75  
Old 06-04-2017, 06:01 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
I'm not sure which is worse, that the President Of The United States is such an embarrassing jerk...or that so many 'supposed' American citizens don't care.
He is a jerk, and I think a lot of Americans do care. We in The Villages live in a bubble that is not representative of the nation as a whole. Yes, there are a lot of Trumpers here, that don't care, but you go outside The Villages, into other states, and people are disgusted Trump and with what is going on.
 

Tags
fbi, trump, russia, comey, ending


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 PM.