Originally Posted by Guest

...or maybe Clinton didn't actually do anything and there was no INTENT regarding her emails.

I love the hilarious conspiracy theories though reps, keep them coming.

Show me in the statute (law for you libtards) where "intent" is a requirement. I worked with classified information for many years and I know the law quite well. There is NO requirement for intent when it comes to the requirement for safeguarding classified information and for not giving classified to uncleared personnel. When you find the part where it says that "intent" is a requirement, please show me because it must have been added to the statute in the last couple of years. What a dumb

Originally Posted by Guest

Show me in the statute (law for you libtards) where "intent" is a requirement. I worked with classified information for many years and I know the law quite well. There is NO requirement for intent when it comes to the requirement for safeguarding classified information and for not giving classified to uncleared personnel. When you find the part where it says that "intent" is a requirement, please show me because it must have been added to the statute in the last couple of years. What a dumb

It's use as a defense is a Clinton/Obama exclusivity.