Sad

Originally Posted by Guest

Obama and the lot are no better. Good example:

Attorney General Lynch 'Pleads Fifth' on Secret Iran 'Ransom' Payments

Maybe somebody should also take a look at G. W. Bush and Dick Cheney.
Still looking for all those WMDs

Originally Posted by Guest

Sad

And ask the Republican controlled Congress why they cut the funding for security for our embassies.
and cut it even more for the annex like Benghazi

Originally Posted by Guest

And ask the Republican controlled Congress why they cut the funding for security for our embassies.
and cut it even more for the annex like Benghazi

That is not reason the calls for help were ignored that night she was sleeping.

We all know she needs her rest,

May those 4 RIP

Wiener is facing 15 years in prison.


He has a lot of reason to talk.

He may have an axe to grind against Huma & Clinton's who knows?

This we know (and is my point): Had she not stashed her email on an unsecured, secret, unauthorized server, @FBI would not be investigating.

From a former soldier, "Having held a DoD Secret Clearance and having been deployed to Kuwait, Iraq and Afghanistan, I can tell you I've seen many charged for less."

Lynch objected to Comey's decision to notify Congress of email review, Bill told her to say that.

The officials acknowledged there was little Lynch and Yates could do given the fallout over Lynch's controversial meeting over the summer with former President Bill Clinton.
Lynch and Yates objected after Comey gave advance notice to top officials at the Justice Department before sending the letter to lawmakers, law enforcement officials briefed on the matter said. Justice officials didn't sign off on Comey's decision and he didn't seek their approval, one official said.

“Think about it, she set it up in 2009, before becoming secretary of state. So she anticipated having exchanges that she would not want anyone to see. So we’ve been asking ourselves on this set for a year almost, what exactly didn’t she want people to see? Well, now we know,” Krauthammer said.

“As we speculated, the most plausible explanation was the rank corruption of the Clinton Foundation and its corrupt — I don’t know if it’s illegal, but corrupt relationship with the State Department,” he said.

“Her only defense as we saw earlier, the Democrats are saying, ‘Well, there was nothing she did … that was corrupted by donations.’ You can believe that if you want, but there’s a reason that people give donations in large amounts, and that’s to influence the outcome of decisions,” he said.

“So, this — we are getting unfolding to us exactly what she anticipated having to hide, and it is really dirty business,” he said.

Krauthammer had made similar comments in a National Review article, in which he delivered a scathing indictment of the Clinton Foundation.

“The foundation is a massive family enterprise disguised as a charity, an opaque and elaborate mechanism for sucking money from the rich and the tyrannous to be channeled to Clinton Inc.,” he wrote.

“Its purpose is to maintain the Clintons’ lifestyle (offices, travel, accommodations, etc.), secure profitable connections, produce favorable publicity, and reliably employ a vast entourage of retainers, ready to serve today and at the coming Clinton Restoration. Now we learn how the whole machine operated,” he added.

Krauthammer noted that “e-mails began dribbling out showing foundation officials contacting State Department counterparts to ask favors for foundation ‘friends.'”

He noted that the only thing saving the Clintons is the swamp of political culture in which Washington operates.

“Yes, it’s obvious that access and influence were sold. But no one has demonstrated definitively that the donors received something tangible of value — a pipeline, a permit, a waiver, a favorable regulatory ruling — in exchange,” he said.

“It’s not until a Rolex shows up on your wrist that you get indicted. Or you are found to have dangled a Senate appointment for cash. Then … you go to jail.”

Originally Posted by Guest

“Think about it, she set it up in 2009, before becoming secretary of state. So she anticipated having exchanges that she would not want anyone to see. So we’ve been asking ourselves on this set for a year almost, what exactly didn’t she want people to see? Well, now we know,” Krauthammer said.

“As we speculated, the most plausible explanation was the rank corruption of the Clinton Foundation and its corrupt — I don’t know if it’s illegal, but corrupt relationship with the State Department,” he said.

“Her only defense as we saw earlier, the Democrats are saying, ‘Well, there was nothing she did … that was corrupted by donations.’ You can believe that if you want, but there’s a reason that people give donations in large amounts, and that’s to influence the outcome of decisions,” he said.

“So, this — we are getting unfolding to us exactly what she anticipated having to hide, and it is really dirty business,” he said.

Krauthammer had made similar comments in a National Review article, in which he delivered a scathing indictment of the Clinton Foundation.

“The foundation is a massive family enterprise disguised as a charity, an opaque and elaborate mechanism for sucking money from the rich and the tyrannous to be channeled to Clinton Inc.,” he wrote.

“Its purpose is to maintain the Clintons’ lifestyle (offices, travel, accommodations, etc.), secure profitable connections, produce favorable publicity, and reliably employ a vast entourage of retainers, ready to serve today and at the coming Clinton Restoration. Now we learn how the whole machine operated,” he added.

Krauthammer noted that “e-mails began dribbling out showing foundation officials contacting State Department counterparts to ask favors for foundation ‘friends.'”

He noted that the only thing saving the Clintons is the swamp of political culture in which Washington operates.

“Yes, it’s obvious that access and influence were sold. But no one has demonstrated definitively that the donors received something tangible of value — a pipeline, a permit, a waiver, a favorable regulatory ruling — in exchange,” he said.

“It’s not until a Rolex shows up on your wrist that you get indicted. Or you are found to have dangled a Senate appointment for cash. Then … you go to jail.”

Good post.

Great post

I hope this goes all the way up to Obama and Lynch, treasonous pieces of crap.

For Democrats, New Focus on Clinton Emails Is ‘Like an 18-Wheeler Smacking Into Us’

Now this is the bias NYT folks

Leading Democrats and advisers to Hillary Clinton expressed deep concern on Saturday that the renewed attention and unanswered questions about emails relating to Mrs. Clinton would turn some voters against her and hurt party candidates in competitive House and Senate races, as new details surfaced on Saturday about how the messages had come to investigators’ attention.

Mrs. Clinton’s advisers said they were not changing any political strategy, television advertising or campaign travel plans to try to contain the potential damage of the new F.B.I. inquiry into emails that belonged to Mrs. Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin. The emails were discovered on the computer of her estranged husband, Anthony D. Weiner, during a separate investigation into allegations that he had exchanged sexually explicit text messages with a teenager.

Mrs. Clinton made no rash moves overnight or on Saturday, advisers said, making clear that she wanted the campaign to operate normally while putting pressure on the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, to provide more details about the inquiry to dispel any possibility that her candidacy was under legal threat.

(because the Clinton are above the law, she knows evidence can't be released)

In conference calls, email chains and overnight text messages, Clinton aides provided talking points for allies to convey a coordinated message that the campaign was confident that the F.B.I. would find nothing to hurt Mrs. Clinton in the new inquiry. According to several party officials, donors and campaign surrogates appearing on television, the greater concern is that an election that seemed like Mrs. Clinton’s to lose will now be thrown into doubt, depressing some of her supporters while rallying Republicans around down-ballot candidates and even their battered presidential nominee, Donald J. Trump.


“This is like an 18-wheeler smacking into us, and it just becomes a huge distraction at the worst possible time,” said Donna Brazile, the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee and a close Clinton ally. “The campaign is trying to cut through the noise as best it can. We don’t want it to knock us off our game. But on the second-to-last weekend of the race, we find ourselves having to tell voters, ‘Keep your focus, keep your eyes on the prize.’”

The investigation into Mr. Weiner gathered momentum in late September. Prosecutors in Manhattan and Charlotte, N.C., had been vying for the case, as the teenager involved is from North Carolina. Top officials in the Justice Department ultimately decided that any prosecution would take place in New York.

Several weeks ago, agents in New York executed a search warrant and seized a Dell laptop computer, an iPad and an iPhone belonging to Mr. Weiner, according to a person with knowledge of that matter. At the time, several agents were aware that they were treading into potentially treacherous waters. They knew that, because of Ms. Abedin’s role as an adviser to Mrs. Clinton, they might uncover materials related to the Clinton email investigation, which had already been declared closed. It was, as one investigator described it, “a potential headache.”

While reviewing the laptop, agents came across what is known as metadata — files that list to-and-from information for emails. That is how agents learned of the existence of tens of thousands of emails similar to those that the F.B.I. examined as part of its earlier investigation into whether Mrs. Clinton or her aides had mishandled classified information, according to senior law enforcement officials.

Then, in order to examine those emails, the agents and prosecutors had to get another search warrant, this one connected to the email investigation, not the text messages case. Until that warrant was signed by a judge, they would not be able to review those emails.


The timeline of when all that unfolded is unclear, and many questions remain unanswered, including whether the emails in question were initially visible on the laptop, or had been deleted and were restored in the bureau’s examination of the device under the authority of the Weiner case warrant. Investigators are still seeking to determine the time period during which Ms. Abedin, who is now estranged from Mr. Weiner, had access to the computer.

The laptop was one of several devices that agents overseeing the email investigation had assumed existed but had never examined. Despite efforts to identify every computer and phone that Mrs. Clinton and her aides had used when she was secretary of state, agents could not find several devices, including several of Mrs. Clinton’s cellphones and two iPads. The agents knew that those devices — and others they were not aware of — may someday be found. But they felt comfortable closing the case because they had found no evidence that anyone had intentionally broken the law.

It is not clear that the newly discovered emails will change that conclusion. Many are expected to be duplicates of emails that have already been examined, and the government has not concluded that they contain classified information. But investigators felt obligated to look. (duplicates sure that why Comely put his career on the line THIS must be something big)

In a conference call with campaign surrogates on Friday night, a rare gathering at the start of a weekend, Clinton advisers asked them to push a coordinated message in news media interviews and with voters: that the F.B.I. investigation had not been reopened; that none of the new emails had emerged from Mrs. Clinton; that the F.B.I. had to release more details about its inquiry; and that they were concerned that Mr. Comey had taken this action. (we know they control the media)

Mrs. Clinton’s advisers said she was still planning to campaign as scheduled in Florida on Saturday and Sunday, in Ohio on Monday, in Florida on Tuesday and in the Republican-leaning state of Arizona on Wednesday. Clinton aides said that by sticking to the Arizona plan, Mrs. Clinton was projecting confidence that she had not been knocked off her stride, and that the campaign was not reshuffling its plans because of the 11th-hour surprise from Mr. Comey.

As much as Clinton advisers stressed that they were not panicking, some of them radiated anger at Mr. Comey, Mr. Weiner and even Mrs. Clinton herself — a reflection of 18 months of frustration that her personal decisions about her email practices and privacy were still generating unhelpful political drama at this stage of the race.

Some prominent Democratic women, meanwhile, were angry that a murky announcement from the F.B.I. might impede the possible election of the first female president of the United States. They said they were angry about a potential double standard hitting a female nominee, since the F.B.I. could well be investigating other candidates and other political issues, and worried that Republicans will use this email inquiry to stoke mistrust around Mrs. Clinton.

“It worries me because it gives the Republicans something to blow up and fan folks’ anger with,” said former Representative Patricia Schroeder of Colorado, who considered a run for the Democratic nomination for president in 1988. “I was on the Judiciary Committee when I was in Congress, and I have never seen the F.B.I. handle any case the way they have handled hers.” (no other case in history was like this)

(in July all the Dems praised Comey for his handling of the case now they attack him)

After a DEFCON 1 freakout, we now know the emails in question were:

1) Not from Hillary
2) Not from her sever
3) Not from her investigation

They contain classified information or do you think if they were taking about golf the FBI would do this.

the classified emails were originally to or from HRC, how they got to the pervert or Huma---No one knows yet, so chill out