Originally Posted by Guest

Try Reuters, AP or any wire service.

Fox is biased so much, you miss a lot of real news. Cable NEWS is not news on ANY of them. It is discussion of what "they" consider worthy of discussing that day...done by a producer that you do not know of and will never meet.

If you think you get more NEWS on Fox than on CNN or MSNBC, you are sadly mistaken. You get a conservative does of commentary such as listening to Rush Limbaugh.

We are lazy....you cannot....it is impossible....to be informed watching tv. Reading, as it used to be, is required.

Hate to burst your liberal bubble, but FOX gets most of their news from AP and Reuters.

Yes, there is more news broadcast on FOX, generally speaking. There are many instances where the other networks air zero seconds on an item of news. Even you must know that, even if you wish to deny it.

Originally Posted by Guest

I have a bias. As you said, everyone does.

My point is that all news organizations have a bias and because of the ownership, the vast majority of them have a liberal bias. FoxNews has been one of the very few that had a conservative slant. Now that appears to be changing.

In a perfect world, news media would simply present facts ands not give their spin on things.

Yes...we all do...based on life experience.

They're ALL politically correct...that's a BIG problem...there is no truth any more. That's the main agenda...offend none...include everyone.

Conservative "slant"? It was tipped completely to the right...sickeningly so.

In a perfect world...but we don't live in a perfect world and ALL the "news" is biased and propagandized.

Originally Posted by Guest

Try Reuters, AP or any wire service.

Fox is biased so much, you miss a lot of real news. Cable NEWS is not news on ANY of them. It is discussion of what "they" consider worthy of discussing that day...done by a producer that you do not know of and will never meet.

If you think you get more NEWS on Fox than on CNN or MSNBC, you are sadly mistaken. You get a conservative does of commentary such as listening to Rush Limbaugh.

We are lazy....you cannot....it is impossible....to be informed watching tv. Reading, as it used to be, is required.

They ALL have a slant...trust none of them. Trust NO source.

Exactly...the "news" is there to draw eyes for the commercials and to promote someones agenda.

If you think you're getting REAL and UNBIASED news from ANY mainstream source...you are sadly mistaken.

All good points Rocky...it IS impossible to get real news from TV. And you have to be REAL careful with print too. I'd guess the truth often comes from you tube uploads.

It's very sad how the people are deliberately lied to.

Originally Posted by Guest

Try Reuters, AP or any wire service.

Fox is biased so much, you miss a lot of real news. Cable NEWS is not news on ANY of them. It is discussion of what "they" consider worthy of discussing that day...done by a producer that you do not know of and will never meet.

If you think you get more NEWS on Fox than on CNN or MSNBC, you are sadly mistaken. You get a conservative does of commentary such as listening to Rush Limbaugh.

We are lazy....you cannot....it is impossible....to be informed watching tv. Reading, as it used to be, is required.

And CNN and MSNBC do not broadcast discussion of what they consider to be worthy of discussing that day?

CNN and MSNBC are nothing more than extreme left wings of the democratic party. The other networks, while not as bad as CNN or MSNBC all present the news with a liberal slant as do most of the newspapers today.

I don't think that most of them do it on purpose. The people that work for those publication and media outlets tend to be liberals. They hire more liberals. They don't look at their viewpoints as liberal, they just see them as the truth.

I am reminded of the story of when President Nixon was elected in one of largest landslides in US history. A seasoned Washington newspaper writer made the statement this statement to a friend at a cocktail party. "I don't understand how Nixon was elected. I don't know a single person that voted for him."

If a person on that position doesn't know one person from the other side of the political spectrum, is there an possibility that they can be objective?

That person is a liberal and every one she knows is a liberal and they all agree. As far as they are concerned, their positions on issues are simply given.

Originally Posted by Guest

And CNN and MSNBC do not broadcast discussion of what they consider to be worthy of discussing that day?

CNN and MSNBC are nothing more than extreme left wings of the democratic party. The other networks, while not as bad as CNN or MSNBC all present the news with a liberal slant as do most of the newspapers today.

I don't think that most of them do it on purpose. The people that work for those publication and media outlets tend to be liberals. They hire more liberals. They don't look at their viewpoints as liberal, they just see them as the truth.

I am reminded of the story of when President Nixon was elected in one of largest landslides in US history. A seasoned Washington newspaper writer made the statement this statement to a friend at a cocktail party. "I don't understand how Nixon was elected. I don't know a single person that voted for him."

If a person on that position doesn't know one person from the other side of the political spectrum, is there an possibility that they can be objective?

That person is a liberal and every one she knows is a liberal and they all agree. As far as they are concerned, their positions on issues are simply given.

Because there are more and more women and minorities running things. Women and minorities are increasingly in positions of power. Because their numbers are growing.

They don't realize it...they see it as the truth...because they're delusional women and minorities...who seem to be unable to think/act logically. That's why they have FAILED countries and white men have successful countries.

Women and minorities...living their deluded lives...slowly destroying America.

Originally Posted by Guest

And CNN and MSNBC do not broadcast discussion of what they consider to be worthy of discussing that day?

CNN and MSNBC are nothing more than extreme left wings of the democratic party. The other networks, while not as bad as CNN or MSNBC all present the news with a liberal slant as do most of the newspapers today.

I don't think that most of them do it on purpose. The people that work for those publication and media outlets tend to be liberals. They hire more liberals. They don't look at their viewpoints as liberal, they just see them as the truth.

I am reminded of the story of when President Nixon was elected in one of largest landslides in US history. A seasoned Washington newspaper writer made the statement this statement to a friend at a cocktail party. "I don't understand how Nixon was elected. I don't know a single person that voted for him."

If a person on that position doesn't know one person from the other side of the political spectrum, is there an possibility that they can be objective?

That person is a liberal and every one she knows is a liberal and they all agree. As far as they are concerned, their positions on issues are simply given.

Richard Nixon is a very far cry from Donald John Trump. One was a talented politician the other is a consummate liar, demagogue and con man.

Originally Posted by Guest

Let's begin with what we know.

Roger Aisles is out there and is salivating for another network, so to question 3, yes there will be a new conservative station, but timing is something else. There are a lot of approvals needed, etc., and this will take time.

I do not think Fox will "go left" whatever that means. They have lost and are losing credibility because they tied themselves so closely to Trump. They have a lot of quality people there that are very frustrated, and want to report NEWS, and have the other radical folks that will support whatever lie or conspiracy theory is the newest. So, no to whatever going left means, but trying to become a more conservative answer with NEWS, yes. Thus, the door will open for Aisles to put together the extremists for a new network, while Fox can concentrate on news rather than what they have turned into.

If a new station is created in Aisles image with folks, the ratings will mirror the hard right extremists that support Trump no matter what he does or says. The extreme alt right has been looking for a voice, and they found him.

If what I am saying happens, the viewing numbers for conservative viewers will get split, as Fox would then be trying to compete with CNN and MSNBC.

I abhor cable news channels in general, and haveing "NEWS" be referred to as LEFT or RIGHT is very disconcerting. News is news.

Of course, producers who decide what is presented will oft times as human beings lean one way or another.

I detest cable news. Does not mean I do not watch. I like selected people on each channel. I also hate the demeaning of these channels by the President, posters, etc. I much prefer to read ALL sides, which allows me not to be distracted by personalities, and to verify what I am hearing.

CNN is not news network, they are cheating liberal propaganda outlet for DNC and liberalize When they got caught giving debate questions to DNC they stopped being news Network. DNC, CNN, and Hillary are KNOWN cheaters and lair's. anybody that condones that are Party sheep.

Originally Posted by Guest

CNN is not news network, they are cheating liberal propaganda outlet for DNC and liberalize When they got caught giving debate questions to DNC they stopped being news Network. DNC, CNN, and Hillary are KNOWN cheaters and lair's. anybody that condones that are Party sheep.

Liberal, conservative, who cares. I want the news. Accurate news. News you can trust.

Originally Posted by Guest

Liberal, conservative, who cares. I want the news. Accurate news. News you can trust.

You WON'T get it from ANY mainstream source...

Originally Posted by Guest

Richard Nixon is a very far cry from Donald John Trump. One was a talented politician the other is a consummate liar, demagogue and con man.

Nice try at changing the narrative, but you obviously know that your opinions of those two men nothing to do with the point of my post.

Originally Posted by Guest

Hate to burst your liberal bubble, but FOX gets most of their news from AP and Reuters.

Yes, there is more news broadcast on FOX, generally speaking. There are many instances where the other networks air zero seconds on an item of news. Even you must know that, even if you wish to deny it.

They all get their news from these sources. Part of the bias is in which stories they decide to broadcast.

Originally Posted by Guest

Liberal, conservative, who cares. I want the news. Accurate news. News you can trust.

Try various non USA news sources. While biased in domestic related news some are more factual with USA news than ANY USA news source.

Amen brother I am with you. And this matters HOW? Man work on the things you can have a affect on .. Your Family . Your Community Etc.. These other people could give a RATS ASS about you.

I love the Givea**** meter!!

While CNN is talking about important information regarding Trump giving classified information to the Russians, Fox is talking about Miss Universe contest and " rompers" for men (one piece outfit) .

Originally Posted by Guest

While CNN is talking about important information regarding Trump giving classified information to the Russians, Fox is talking about Miss Universe contest and " rompers" for men (one piece outfit) .

Just the fact that they aren't actively supporting and making excuses for Trump, as usual...is pretty revealing in itself.

Add to that a staunch Republican like Senator Bob Corker stating; "The Trump White House has got to do something soon to bring itself under control and order"...even dummies should be able to figure out something is really wrong.



Donald Trump 'revealed highly classified intelligence' to Sergey Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister

Some Republicans expressed shock at the development, with Senator Bob Corker stating that the Trump White House "has got to do something soon to bring itself under control and order".