Originally Posted by Guest

No, the bark was real. Taking a bark out of context? Only a dog would know, I guess. I heard her speech where she started barking. The crowd smiled and giggle in embarrassment. I thought she had lost it and wondered how many votes she lost when she did her bark.

Any chance you want to dispute the Trump tape? Did they lie? Was it out of context?

Originally Posted by Guest

ok-you win
When did she bark and what was the context?
[i'll help you if you don't know]

Here is her entire barking speech.

Hillary Clinton barks like a dog to slam Republicans - CNNPolitics.com

The context? How stupid! She was barking in a speech, period. She has finally shown her true nature. Context does not matter, especially in a campaign ad. The Trump campaign add with her barking was probably the best I've seen. The left takes comments out of context consistently, and then cries a river when someone uses their words against them.

This campaign ad was Super bowl quality. It was great.

Wow, she illustrated a point in her speech with a little light humor. Big deal!
The childish name calling ("Killery") is more troubling to me.

Originally Posted by Guest

He is just observing " The Biden Rule " .

I suggest you get some "history" on the so called Biden Rule.

Mitch McConnell and other Senate Republicans will be violating their oaths of office and neglecting their duties under the Constitution if they refuse to allow a vote on Obama’s nominee. Republicans would rather cater to the shrinking base of their party than do their jobs.

The walls are closing in, and Senate Republicans are running out of excuses for taking the taxpayers’ money while refusing to fulfill their constitutional duties. What a bunch of jerks. The President has fulfilled his constitutional duty by putting forth a candidate , a moderate one that Republicans had easily confirmed before. Now they set a new precedent by not allowing a hearing. They are not opposed to the candidate, they are opposed to Obama, and are using their power just because they can. Hopefully it will backfire on them and the taxpayers will vote for someone that will actually represent them and do their job. Even so, the Democratic president will put forth the same name after the election, so this little schoolyard stunt just makes the Republicans look like what they are - a bunch of whiney little kids. Grow up.

Originally Posted by Guest

Mitch McConnell and other Senate Republicans will be violating their oaths of office and neglecting their duties under the Constitution if they refuse to allow a vote on Obama’s nominee. Republicans would rather cater to the shrinking base of their party than do their jobs.

The walls are closing in, and Senate Republicans are running out of excuses for taking the taxpayers’ money while refusing to fulfill their constitutional duties. What a bunch of jerks. The President has fulfilled his constitutional duty by putting forth a candidate , a moderate one that Republicans had easily confirmed before. Now they set a new precedent by not allowing a hearing. They are not opposed to the candidate, they are opposed to Obama, and are using their power just because they can. Hopefully it will backfire on them and the taxpayers will vote for someone that will actually represent them and do their job. Even so, the Democratic president will put forth the same name after the election, so this little schoolyard stunt just makes the Republicans look like what they are - a bunch of whiney little kids. Grow up.

Get over it. They are doing exactly what I voted them in for, stopping liberal corruption of our democracy. You are the "whiny little kid" that you accuse others of being. It is you that's whining because they are using the "Biden rule." You had no problem with Harry Reid holding a hundred bills, passed by the House on his desk, refusing to allow a vote on them. It is your party that forced Obamacare through when the majority of Americans did not want it. So, quit crying and get over it. There is no rush to confirm a new judge. If you really thought that Hillary was going to win the election, you wouldn't be panicking like a little girl.

Originally Posted by Guest

Wow, she illustrated a point in her speech with a little light humor. Big deal!
The childish name calling ("Killery") is more troubling to me.

Well, she was responsible for the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi, so what's your problem? No telling how many deaths have resulted from her felony violation of transmitting classified information over an unsecured Internet.

Originally Posted by Guest

I suggest you get some "history" on the so called Biden Rule.

I suggest that you go back and listen to or read what Biden said about election year nominations. The left is adamant about getting their way, like little spoiled children. When the shoe is on the other foot, they cry like little children and scream that it's unfair.

Originally Posted by Guest

He is just observing " The Biden Rule " .

BS! Democrats have never blocked a hearing. They have always allowed the vote to take place. You can defend this "do nothing" republican party but we all know the truth.

Originally Posted by Guest

The context? How stupid! She was barking in a speech, period. She has finally shown her true nature. Context does not matter, especially in a campaign ad. The Trump campaign add with her barking was probably the best I've seen. The left takes comments out of context consistently, and then cries a river when someone uses their words against them.

This campaign ad was Super bowl quality. It was great.

Typical Republican defense: "They do it to so it's ok for us." Please give us an example.

Originally Posted by Guest

Well, she was responsible for the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi, so what's your problem? No telling how many deaths have resulted from her felony violation of transmitting classified information over an unsecured Internet.

Democratic Question: How come republicans are a owned by big business?
Republican response: Benghazi,Benghazi,Benghazi,Benghazi!!!

Democratic Question: How come republicans won't do their job?
Republican response: Benghazi,Benghazi,Benghazi,Benghazi!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

Typical Republican defense: "They do it to so it's ok for us." Please give us an example.

I have given examples, many times on here. NOW, you go back and read the comments. Quit being so lazy.

Originally Posted by Guest

Democratic Question: How come republicans are a owned by big business?
Republican response: Benghazi,Benghazi,Benghazi,Benghazi!!!

Democratic Question: How come republicans won't do their job?
Republican response: Benghazi,Benghazi,Benghazi,Benghazi!!!

Kind of taking this whole thing out of context, aren't you? Are you really that retarded, or are you just so ignorant that you insist on running amok with no available points or facts to substantiate your comments?

Originally Posted by Guest

BS! Democrats have never blocked a hearing. They have always allowed the vote to take place. You can defend this "do nothing" republican party but we all know the truth.

You are definitely not the brightest light bulb on the Christmas tree. Where have you been hiding, under a rock? Before saying such idiotic things like that, you should do some research. Where do you think the "Biden Rule" came from? And have you not read or listened to Chuck Schumer's comment regarding Bush's nominations? Wow, you should abstain from commenting until you have something valid to say. If you liberals are so sure that Hillary is going to get elected, why not wait for her to nominate a liberal judge? What are you scared of? Where's your confidence? Me thinks, thou bluster is a sham.