Originally Posted by Guest

Enjoy your grandbabies and don't post things like this, go spend this ugly posting times baking cookies.

Yes, the women should be in the kitchen discussing important things like who's cheating on whom, dancing with the stars, kardashians...the pressing world changing issues.

Seriously, you SHOULD be in the kitchen, teaching your daughters how to be good mothers. I know, you'd rather have a "career" shuffling papers. But you have a JOB that nature made you for. Raising your children.

So yes, enjoy your grandbabies...and stay out of "mens" business. The reality of the world IS ugly, it's best you go away and let us take care of it. We did really well until the 60s when "you" took over. Now look at things!

Originally Posted by Guest

Hillary is a racist. She tries to portray herself as the right selection but in reality, she is a racist. This is what Hillary said about Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood): "” I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision,” said Hillary Rodham Clinton, “I am really in awe of her, there are a lot of lessons we can learn from her life”

These are comments made by Margaret Sanger:

"The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

"[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring."

“Plan for Peace” from Birth Control Review (April 1932, pp. 107-108)
Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.
Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…
Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.

“America Needs a Code for Babies,” 27 Mar 1934

Give dysgenic groups [people with “bad genes”] in our population their choice of segregation or [compulsory] sterilization.

April 1932 Birth Control Review, pg. 108

Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.

Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

Hillary admired Sanger.

I AGREE with this...let's start now. Reproduction is too costly to EVERYONE for it to be so easy. The "parents" suffer. The child suffers. Society suffers when "unfit" parents have a child or an unfit single has a child.

I've advocated something in the water and you need to get the antidote before you can conceive. AFTER testing for parental fitness.

The only qualm I have is I'd like to see the negro population drop...precipitously. Why would anyone want MORE people on welfare?

Originally Posted by Guest

Very well said.

Talk about big government and invasion of privacy and the rest. As well as freedom of religion. Typical Republican hypocrisy.

Interesting you are against big government and still support Obama and Hillary? Amazing statement.

Are your noticing that the Liberals have no answers? Just attacks. They can never confront any issue p, not Judy this one. Ask them for a few of Hillarys accomplishments and see what you get.

Originally Posted by Guest

Are your noticing that the Liberals have no answers? Just attacks. They can never confront any issue p, not Judy this one. Ask them for a few of Hillarys accomplishments and see what you get.

If I have to read anything more then a couple of sentences, without support, I skip it. Don't mistake that for being agreeable or non-confrontational.

Originally Posted by Guest

If I have to read anything more then a couple of sentences, without support, I skip it. Don't mistake that for being agreeable or non-confrontational.

Of course not. You are one of the smarter liberals, that isn't going to argue the unarguable.

Originally Posted by Guest

Interesting you are against big government and still support Obama and Hillary? Amazing statement.

only an idiot thinks that having a GOP president and a GOP congress means smaller government. show me where this congress or any GOP president actually made government smaller. you can't in fact government grew in size and cost under every scenario

Originally Posted by Guest

only an idiot thinks that having a GOP president and a GOP congress means smaller government. show me where this congress or any GOP president actually made government smaller. you can't in fact government grew in size and cost under every scenario

All these negative people. Always, saying it can't be done because someone hasn't done it before. Naysayers!

The issue of abortion is not about a political candidate or about someone's religion or about rights or laws those are all distractions to deflect the central issue of abortion and that is.....what affect does abortion have on our emotional state, philosophical leanings and statistical well being.

If we easily dismiss a fetus as a non-being then does it progress to a race of people, disabled people. Isn't that what is occurring in other countries with mass genocide. its that what happen in Nazi Germany with jews and Nazi final solution to their problem. And doesn't the repeating of this act make people numb to the issue. 50 million plus abortions in this country since Roe v Wade and its a common practice with many like taking a laxative. And what affect does this have on our nation. china's one child policy which allowed abortions created a shortage of young people and facing an aging issue china quickly changed their policy. Its not nice to fool mother nature.

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Not only is that juvenile, but probably the stupidest comment on here in a long time.

From a buffoon like you, I take that as a compliment. Touched a nerve didn't I?

Originally Posted by Guest

Do we REALLY have to list all the flip-flopping by Hillary on such things as gay marriage, abortions, etc? Vote on what they say today and hope they don't change after they are elected. Everyone changes positions on issues.

Why don't you address trump's flip flops. You can't, but I will consider the source.

Originally Posted by Guest

The issue of abortion is not about a political candidate or about someone's religion or about rights or laws those are all distractions to deflect the central issue of abortion and that is.....what affect does abortion have on our emotional state, philosophical leanings and statistical well being.

If we easily dismiss a fetus as a non-being then does it progress to a race of people, disabled people. Isn't that what is occurring in other countries with mass genocide. its that what happen in Nazi Germany with jews and Nazi final solution to their problem. And doesn't the repeating of this act make people numb to the issue. 50 million plus abortions in this country since Roe v Wade and its a common practice with many like taking a laxative. And what affect does this have on our nation. china's one child policy which allowed abortions created a shortage of young people and facing an aging issue china quickly changed their policy. Its not nice to fool mother nature.

Personal Best Regards:

People who dismiss it for reasons of Religion, a fetus is not a real person. It's my body etc. Are usually afraid to confront the real issue, a baby is being killed and if they close their eyes it means that a baby is not being killed.

Originally Posted by Guest

Are your noticing that the Liberals have no answers? Just attacks. They can never confront any issue p, not Judy this one. Ask them for a few of Hillarys accomplishments and see what you get.

Anything said in defense of Hillary would be ridiculed by buffoons like you. You are a trumpster, enough said.

Originally Posted by Guest

Anything said in defense of Hillary would be ridiculed by buffoons like you. You are a trumpster, enough said.

Is there a reason why you feel the need to name call, or is that the only response when you have no argumentative reply worthy or strong enough to support your view? You do know that your use of derogatory names just makes you appear weak, and your view less worthy of consideration.

To paraphrase my lengthy comment, DON'T BE AN @SS!

Originally Posted by Guest

Is there a reason why you feel the need to name call, ...................
DON'T BE AN @SS!

good advice