Peter Franz Schweizer (November 24, 1964) is an American author and right wing political consultant. He is the president of the Government "Accountability Institute (GAI) and a former William J. Casey Research Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution.[1] He is also Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large.[2] He is known for writing Clinton Cash, a 2015 book that investigates donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities, paid speeches made by Bill and Hillary Clinton, and the Clintons' personal enrichment since they left the White House, in 2001." Peter Schweizer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

News always seems to start at Breibart. Next the other conservative sites pick up on it. Then comes a report from the Government Accountability Institute. Then Breibart reports their research. So it all looks like it's coming from many different places corroborating each others information.

I understand why Cruz is so frustrated. It wasn't supposed to play out this way.

Originally Posted by Guest

Too bad – this is not true.
Check out Snopes.
Jerry Zeifman Fired Hillary Clinton from the Watergate Investigation : snopes.com

Snopes is 100% pure BS .

Tell us why we should believe Snopes on anything . Why ?
Do they have the same level of Infailability on POlitical Issues as the Pope is supposed to have on religious issues ?

Originally Posted by Guest

Snopes is 100% pure BS .

Tell us why we should believe Snopes on anything . Why ?
Do they have the same level of Infailability on POlitical Issues as the Pope is supposed to have on religious issues ?

Snopes provides sources. You decide if the sources are valid.
I'm not sure how the Pope does it.

Originally Posted by Guest

Snopes is 100% pure BS .

Tell us why we should believe Snopes on anything . Why ?
Do they have the same level of Infailability on POlitical Issues as the Pope is supposed to have on religious issues ?

It's only bs when you don't like facts presented. That is such a common complaint.

Originally Posted by Guest

It's only bs when you don't like facts presented. That is such a common complaint.

Yep, facts can be so limiting.

It sucks the air right out of the whiners and screamers, who prefer sources such as mass e-mails without a legitimate source.... or the slant of their beloved Faux News.

You spoil sport you.





CNM

Originally Posted by guest

yep, facts can be so limiting.

It sucks the air right out of the whiners and screamers, who prefer sources such as mass e-mails without a legitimate source.... Or the slant of their beloved faux news.

You spoil sport you. :d





Cnm

troll attention seeker alert!!

Originally Posted by Guest

troll attention seeker alert!!

#11

Originally Posted by Flaming Hypocrite

You on the other hand, are just as bad in your own way. You are as agitating as a troll and can't debate an issue without getting personal.

Originally Posted by CNM

And you're lying.

I simply give what I get.

In fact, I'll even do a little experiment.

What I will do (for a while), is simply keep track of the personal attacks directed toward me...without responding in kind.

Not that you have the integrity, honesty or ethics to ever admit that I was right, but at least we'll both know...now won't we? <smug emoji inserted here>

CNM

Originally Posted by Guest

#11

CNM

Got your comments mixed up again. Different posters. Sorry.

Originally Posted by Guest

Got your comments mixed up again. Different posters. Sorry.

Please read the below, so that you might understand that I'm not counting the personal attacks from just ONE poster.

I am simply proving to the poster (we know who she is )who stated that the resident racists and misogynists aren't really that bad and when I address personal attacks from whomever...I'm supposedly in the same category.

In other words, I'm simply doing a short experiment to prove that when I make someone else look foolish...it is almost always due to a personal attack on me first.

Simple...no?

Originally Posted by Flaming Hypocrite

You on the other hand, are just as bad in your own way. You are as agitating as a troll and can't debate an issue without getting personal.

Originally Posted by CNM

And you're lying.

I simply give what I get.

In fact, I'll even do a little experiment.

What I will do (for a while), is simply keep track of the personal attacks directed toward me...without responding in kind.

Not that you have the integrity, honesty or ethics to ever admit that I was right, but at least we'll both know...now won't we? <smug emoji inserted here>

CNM

CNM,

Your experiment (game) is a childish one, but I'll play along. You are a JERK and a STOOGE. Please add those comment to your tally.

Oh, by the way, if you insist on continuing your practice of overusing ellipses in your posts, you could do us the courtesy of using them correctly.

Originally Posted by Guest

CNM,

Your experiment (game) is a childish one, but I'll play along. You are a JERK and a STOOGE. Please add those comment to your tally.

Oh, by the way, if you insist on continuing your practice of overusing ellipses in your posts, you could do us the courtesy of using them correctly.

What is the definition of ellipses as pertains to posting?

Originally Posted by Guest

What is the definition of ellipses as pertains to posting?

continued--I tried looking it up but it talking about string together 3 periods.

Term used to describe three periods that are together (...). In English, the ellipsis is often used as an indication to show any omitted word or other text. You'll often see an ellipsis in file names and commands on a computer to indicate the full filename or command is not being displayed. For example, as seen in the picture, a folder could be named "Computer Hope" but displayed as "Compute..." because the file name column is not wide enough to display the full file name.

Originally Posted by Guest

CNM,

Your experiment (game) is a childish one, but I'll play along. You are a JERK and a STOOGE. Please add those comment to your tally.

Oh, by the way, if you insist on continuing your practice of overusing ellipses in your posts, you could do us the courtesy of using them correctly.

...#12

Originally Posted by Flaming Hypocrite

You on the other hand, are just as bad in your own way. You are as agitating as a troll and can't debate an issue without getting personal.

Originally Posted by CNM

And you're lying.

I simply give what I get.

In fact, I'll even do a little experiment.

What I will do (for a while), is simply keep track of the personal attacks directed toward me...without responding in kind.

Not that you have the integrity, honesty or ethics to ever admit that I was right, but at least we'll both know...now won't we? <smug emoji inserted here>

CNM

Originally Posted by Guest

CNM,

You are a JERK and a STOOGE.

Oh, by the way, if you insist on continuing your practice of overusing ellipses in your posts, you could do us the courtesy of using them correctly.

Did you mean emoji and not ellipse?

Originally Posted by Guest

continued--I tried looking it up but it talking about string together 3 periods.

Term used to describe three periods that are together (...). In English, the ellipsis is often used as an indication to show any omitted word or other text. You'll often see an ellipsis in file names and commands on a computer to indicate the full filename or command is not being displayed. For example, as seen in the picture, a folder could be named "Computer Hope" but displayed as "Compute..." because the file name column is not wide enough to display the full file name.

I use ellipsis to make a point or to add emphasis....like this.

While it is evident that we have someone who fancies himself some type of grammar policeman/policewoman, I find it hilarious that his/her criticism is never directed at some of the posts from those on the right...who can't even compose a complete sentence.

I guess I will just take that as a compliment, that this particular person waits with baited breath...for every single one of my posts.




CNM