Originally Posted by Guest

So you're not even smart enough to discern a parody on the right-wingnut, whose only contribution to this forum...is by constantly using that exact same response?

Sucks to be you.



CNM

No, it doesn't suck, but you did a pretty good job of it last night...............

Originally Posted by Guest

So a law degree makes one prepared for the political circuit?
So a MD makes one prepared for the political circuit?

I think you are a bit biased and small minded if you believe that only specially schooled people can handle politics. You obviously have forgotten the current poser in the White House. On the other hand, perhaps he proves your point.

I don't think, NO I KNOW that I never mentioned any degree or occupation, and in fact made reference to an actor, Reagan.

Nobody is disqualifying based on occupation, but I was responding to (at least I think I was..so much crap inserted) comments praising Trumps ability to be President because of his business experience.

From those comments, many seem very naive to the fact that running a PERSONAL, not ven public company is light years from being President. He is not liable to anyone in running his own business..he can change his budget, alter his plans at anytime in anyway.

Point is..those who think he can are being a bit conned, as he answers to congress, the constitution, and the people and has many steps to take to do anything. He also cannot bully other soveriegn nations and in fact, if tried is terribly determental to our country.

Thus all the talk about what he did in a private, specialized business is irrelevant.

Originally Posted by Guest

I don't think, NO I KNOW that I never mentioned any degree or occupation, and in fact made reference to an actor, Reagan.

Nobody is disqualifying based on occupation, but I was responding to (at least I think I was..so much crap inserted) comments praising Trumps ability to be President because of his business experience.

From those comments, many seem very naive to the fact that running a PERSONAL, not ven public company is light years from being President. He is not liable to anyone in running his own business..he can change his budget, alter his plans at anytime in anyway.

Point is..those who think he can are being a bit conned, as he answers to congress, the constitution, and the people and has many steps to take to do anything. He also cannot bully other soveriegn nations and in fact, if tried is terribly determental to our country.

Thus all the talk about what he did in a private, specialized business is irrelevant.

And again, Regan was a Governor of Cal. So even he knew that governing is different than ruling. Romney was Governir of Mass.

"The Arizona Republic has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president — the first time the newspaper has backed a Democrat in its history.

The Republic's editorial board writes that Clinton understands what the position demands: "a steady hand, a cool head, and the ability to think carefully before acting." And it pointedly concludes that her Republican rival, Donald Trump, does not."

The Arizona Republic Endorses Hillary Clinton; First Time It's Backed A Democrat Ever : NPR

Originally Posted by Guest

The trouble was in his mic and the studio audience speakers, which is a problem for any public speaker.

Oooooh, sure.

Can you say Tanya Harding?

Originally Posted by Guest

"The Arizona Republic has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president — the first time the newspaper has backed a Democrat in its history.

The Republic's editorial board writes that Clinton understands what the position demands: "a steady hand, a cool head, and the ability to think carefully before acting." And it pointedly concludes that her Republican rival, Donald Trump, does not."

The Arizona Republic Endorses Hillary Clinton; First Time It's Backed A Democrat Ever : NPR

Electing Hillary to lead a country because she has experience, is like hiring a bank robber to manage a bank because he has experience handling other people's money.

Bad experience, or failure in this case are not qualities anyone should want running their company or their country. She is irresponsible, unreliable, unethical, dishonest, a pathological liar and a thief. Hardly qualifications for leader of the world. Possibly leader of Venezuela or Cuba, but not America.

Originally Posted by Guest

Electing Hillary to lead a country because she has experience, is like hiring a bank robber to manage a bank because he has experience handling other people's money.

Bad experience, or failure in this case are not qualities anyone should want running their company or their country. She is irresponsible, unreliable, unethical, dishonest, a pathological liar and a thief. Hardly qualifications for leader of the world. Possibly leader of Venezuela or Cuba, but not America.

Go back to your "breibart" type sites.

We are electing someone to execute policy. Trump does not even know what that means.

And you know what...would you like to share tales of eac candidates...irresponsibility, unreliability, unethical behavior, dishonesty, examples of pathological lying, and thievery ?

One thing..I am game but as we need to back up our claims in as much detail as possible...we cannot quote their opponent or campaign, and it cannot be a feeling...must show facts.

I can do Trump very quickly.

And you know, we have two choices only...two. I assure you that our comparison of qualities you mention, Clinton will look saintly in that comparison....sad but true.

Originally Posted by Guest

Go back to your "breibart" type sites.

We are electing someone to execute policy. Trump does not even know what that means.

And you know what...would you like to share tales of eac candidates...irresponsibility, unreliability, unethical behavior, dishonesty, examples of pathological lying, and thievery ?

One thing..I am game but as we need to back up our claims in as much detail as possible...we cannot quote their opponent or campaign, and it cannot be a feeling...must show facts.

I can do Trump very quickly.

And you know, we have two choices only...two. I assure you that our comparison of qualities you mention, Clinton will look saintly in that comparison....sad but true.

If that is what you think, then you are a fool. You are too ignorant or too stubborn to learn anything about the criminal on the left. I figured that since you knew how to express yourself on here, then you would be intelligent enough to know something of the liberal candidate. I was wrong, you are either ignorant of her record or you flat refuse to acknowledge it. A liberal in denial.

Originally Posted by Guest

If that is what you think, then you are a fool. You are too ignorant or too stubborn to learn anything about the criminal on the left. I figured that since you knew how to express yourself on here, then you would be intelligent enough to know something of the liberal candidate. I was wrong, you are either ignorant of her record or you flat refuse to acknowledge it. A liberal in denial.

Just one of the loyal democrats that subscribe to party first no matter who or what.
Talking to them about anything or anyone not on their team or agenda is like talking to a cement block!

Originally Posted by Guest

Oooooh, sure.

Can you say Tanya Harding?

Could you go with that a bit more Mr.Carlton ? Said Dr. Bob Hartley .

what is up with " fact check" that seems to be the thing for this election . I guess everything got to much BS and now has to be factchecked

The Politics of ‘The Shallows’ - WSJ

the author Peggy Noonan is 66 and has seen quite a bit.

What impact has the modern media environment had on the 2016 campaign? I know that’s a boring sentence, but journalists and politicians talk about it a lot, journalists uneasily and politicians with frustration. The 24/7 news cycle and the million multiplying platforms with their escalating demands—for pictures, video, sound, the immediate hot take—exhaust politicians and staff, and media people too. Everyone is tired, and chronically tired people live, perilously, on the Edge of Stupid. More important, modern media realities make everything intellectually thinner, shallower. Everything moves fast; we talk not of the scandal of the day but the scandal of the hour, reducing a great event, a presidential campaign, into an endless river of gaffes.

follow the link - read the entire story--i think it hits home

How many election points do you win when you win the debate? Does it insure your win in the general election?

Originally Posted by Guest

How many election points do you win when you win the debate? Does it insure your win in the general election?

I think if 100 million people watched the debate, it matters. It shows interest.