Originally Posted by Guest

Those of you here that post negative comments do you think you accomplish anything.

Why not give him a chance?

Trump was elected by less that 25% of eligible voters.
can you think of anything positive ???

Originally Posted by Guest

Trump was elected by less that 25% of eligible voters.
can you think of anything positive ???

I believe the average is 17% of the voters actually voted for the guy who won...in all the past presidential elections.

Half don't bother to vote...half of them vote for the other guy...that leaves 25% max.

Originally Posted by Guest

They just see him as conducting business as usual. Wall Street likes predictability in a politician not mavericks. He ran as someone who would really change stuff in DC and he just looks more-and-more like one of the good ole boys.

Obama did about the same thing but not as quickly. He did try to change things but was challenged by the Republicans at just about every step.

Republican challenge did not mean anything in the first two years. Like Trump, Obama had a totally party controlled congress and could do anything he wished. He wasted his time passing Obamacare with NO Republican votes. What a wasted two years. What a wasted 8 years. Yes, I know he is very popular, but so is Oprah, Brad Pitt, DeNiro and any of many celebrities. Obama was and is a paper tiger.

No attempt to weaken. Just pointing out roadblocks aheadbthat WILL weaken this administration.


"Two Justice Department investigations of the German bank that has loaned Donald Trump more than $300 million must be turned over to an independent prosecutor, a senior U.S. Senator said this week, because there will be “a clear conflict of interest” between Trump’s personal business interests and his public duties."


Calls for Deutsche Bank, a Big Trump Lender, to Face Independent Prosecutor - ABC News

House Democrats Warn of Trump’s Potential Conflicts Over Deutsche Bank - WSJ

“Trump will have ample opportunity to make and influence policy decisions that benefit his personal business and financial interests,” the lawmakers wrote in a letter dated Tuesday. “Deutsche has been the only major Wall Street bank to continue to lend to Donald Trump and his entities in the wake of six Trump-business bankruptcies.”
"

"The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is looking into whether big banks have been mishandling securities in the arcane but sizable market for American depositary receipts, according to people close to the investigation.

The SEC has sent subpoenas to four depositary banks— Bank of New York Mellon Corp., Citigroup Inc., Deutsche Bank AG and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.—as it examines whether the banks have broken controls designed to prevent market abuse and tax fraud, people close to the investigation said.

SEC investigators are still in the process of interviewing potential witnesses, as well as analyzing a trove of data the banks sent in response to the subpoenas issued late last year, according to people close to the probe. The investigation won’t necessarily result in enforcement action, they said.

Originally Posted by Guest

No attempt to weaken. Just pointing out roadblocks aheadbthat WILL weaken this administration.


"Two Justice Department investigations of the German bank that has loaned Donald Trump more than $300 million must be turned over to an independent prosecutor, a senior U.S. Senator said this week, because there will be “a clear conflict of interest” between Trump’s personal business interests and his public duties."


Calls for Deutsche Bank, a Big Trump Lender, to Face Independent Prosecutor - ABC News

House Democrats Warn of Trump’s Potential Conflicts Over Deutsche Bank - WSJ

“Trump will have ample opportunity to make and influence policy decisions that benefit his personal business and financial interests,” the lawmakers wrote in a letter dated Tuesday. “Deutsche has been the only major Wall Street bank to continue to lend to Donald Trump and his entities in the wake of six Trump-business bankruptcies.”
"

THERE YOU GO AGAIN after just posting this

Originally Posted by Guest

First, I think I have been extremely clear in a large number of posts that he has my support, and he is the President of the US. Never been a doubt, and it appears that on this forum, the chest beating never stops...either being told to "get over it" or threads on Clinton. I have been clear, and the post to which you replied was asking for discussion on issues.

YET, you cannot accept that, there seems to be a need to insure everyone knows who won the election. I do not understand that need. Why is that alway the response when I, and others try to discuss issues.

That is why I suggest this has become a cult, and not a political forum.

I have standards, chief of which is being right - something you and I apparently don't share.


I think you need more time in your crying room perhaps

Originally Posted by Guest

Trump was elected by less that 25% of eligible voters.
can you think of anything positive ???

There is an AP for sale that specifies every business to boycott to hurt Trump's bottom line.

Trump won and that is the most positive news America has heard in over 8 years. Libtards can have their childish tantrums all they wish, but all they are proving is WHY they lost.

I think it's hilarious, that anyone thinks criticizing the POTUS...is "weakening the presidency."

A big part of being POTUS, is showing the class and grace to accept criticism and continue to do your job...like Obama has.

If the new guy and his supporters are so thin-skinned that they don't understand this...it's gonna be a long couple of years for them.

Originally Posted by Guest

If the new guy ...... so thin-skinned that they don't understand this...it's gonna be a long couple of years for them.

First of all I think the "new guy" deserves being called a better name than that, he earned it.

Trump or President elect is far from thin skinned, Romney, Hally and Cruz for starters

Act like an American, can you?

Originally Posted by Guest

First of all I think the "new guy" deserves being called a better name than that, he earned it.

Trump or President elect is far from thin skinned, Romney, Hally and Cruz for starters

Act like an American, can you?

Are you fvcking serious?

With all of the names that your ilk has called Obama, you want to lecture me on calling Chump (oops )...the "new guy?"

Why haven't you ever whined to them?

That is just surreal.

Originally Posted by Guest

I think it's hilarious, that anyone thinks criticizing the POTUS...is "weakening the presidency."

A big part of being POTUS, is showing the class and grace to accept criticism and continue to do your job...like Obama has.

If the new guy and his supporters are so thin-skinned that they don't understand this...it's gonna be a long couple of years for them.

Let me correct that statement for you to: ".....like Obama does NOT."

Obama has whined from day one of his election. He has ostracized the Republicans for not agreeing with him, as well as the Supreme Court. He even called out the Supreme Court in front of the Nation. He made such comments as "the Republicans are your enemy" when speaking to Latinos. He has said that the Republicans can sit in the rear of the bus. He has criticized law enforcement. Obama has been the most divisive president in history. To say that he has class is definitely a big joke.

And to speak of Trump's supporters by saying we are thin skinned is another joke. It is the left that are rioting in the streets, need pity rooms with puppies and days off from school and are demanding vote recounts.

I guess it is easy for you to make things up in your head, but reality is about to hit you like a runaway train.

Obama has brought class down into a hole that America will be hard fought to climb out of.

Originally Posted by Guest

Those of you here that post negative comments do you think you accomplish anything.

Why not give him a chance?

Isn't that what Neville Chamberlain said about Adolf Hitler?

On Tuesday, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Obama was the "Neville Chamberlain of our time."

Neville Chamberlain’s mistake – acceding to a territorial compromise that did little to check Hitler’s continental aggression – is seen as a kind of original sin, a fatal act of foolishness and moral cowardice that had to be redeemed by nobler, braver men in the hideous years to come.

“This is the greatest appeasement since Chamberlain gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler,” said Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), reacting to the Iran deal last week.

“[President Obama] is doing this because of his very poor understanding of history and what happened to Neville Chamberlain.”