See for yourself:


hhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b287OpdjJ3

Originally Posted by janmcn

See for yourself:


hhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b287OpdjJ3

This was already proved as bogus. These Congressmen purposely walked into the protest, when they had an alternate secure route that is normally taken. They did this purposely to provoke a conflict and were hoping for racial invectives and got none. It's obvious the people are just yelling at the congressmen.

If this was a liberal protest group these Congressmen might have been in real danger.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

This was already proved as bogus. These Congressmen purposely walked into the protest, when they had an alternate secure route that is normally taken. They did this purposely to provoke a conflict and were hoping for racial invectives and got none. It's obvious the people are just yelling at the congressmen.

If this was a liberal protest group these Congressmen might have been in real danger.

Even when it's on video tape, republicans try to maintain it never happened. Just like Rick Santorum said he was misquoted when he said Puerto Ricans should speak english and misquoted again when he was talking about Blahhh's (read blacks). Unfortunately, there is videotape.

Originally Posted by janmcn

Even when it's on video tape, republicans try to maintain it never happened. Just like Rick Santorum said he was misquoted when he said Puerto Ricans should speak english and misquoted again when he was talking about Blahhh's (read blacks). Unfortunately, there is videotape.

WOW..you never give up do you ? PARTY...PARTY...PARTY.....When you see the truth, you deny it on behalf of your PARTY. You were shown your budget thing was bogus so you deny,ignore and move on here.

Are you telling us that you do not recall the big fuss about this video and when it was proven to have been a this was a planned provocation, even the biased media groups backed off....I cant say I admire your admiration of the guy in the WH or your party, because I dont admire your attitude at all, but there is something to be said for being so naive !

Where is your defense of republican presidential candidate, Rick Santorum?

Originally Posted by janmcn

Where is your defense of republican presidential .
, Rick Santorum?

For what reason would I need to "defend" anyone ? Let alone Rick Santorum ?

Why....see, this is the problem...you are a Democrat first and an American, maybe 2nd. You see life and politics through ONLY Democrat party eyes.

I see issues that face the country...I have opinions on anyone in politics but I surely have no need, nor desire to defend anyone

You, WRONGLY, make the assumption that anyone who opposes this President has got to be a Republican like you are a Democrat...BLIND to what is going on.

I oppose this President because he is bad for this country. I do not support anyone in this primary, but gotta tell you....if they were Independents rather than Republicans, they would all be better than this man in the WH right now.

Again, WHY WOULD I NEED OR WANT TO DEFEND RICK SANTORUM ? Please tell me and then go back to your failed accusations where you get responses and then just leave.

Janmcn,

Let them defend Sanitarium as much as they want and hope that Mullah Santorum will be be their candidate. He is so extremist that even the stupid Sarah Palin supporters will think he is too far out there as a space cadet.

Originally Posted by buggyone

Janmcn,

Let them defend Sanitarium as much as they want and hope that Mullah Santorum will be be their candidate. He is so extremist that even the stupid Sarah Palin supporters will think he is too far out there as a space cadet.

I have no idea at all of what you might be speaking of....I just reread this thread and dont think Santorum is mentioned.

Can you clear up what in the world you two are speaking of ?

Janmcn,

It is time to let it go on it's own course. These G'Nopers will never admit their own mistakes - like Junior Bush's momma admitting she should have used birth control!

Anyhow, we have showed statistics that prove beyond a shadow of doubt that the Republicans have no hope of victory in November. Let them sputter all they want. We win! They lose!

Originally Posted by buggyone

Janmcn,

It is time to let it go on it's own course. These G'Nopers will never admit their own mistakes - like Junior Bush's momma admitting she should have used birth control!

Anyhow, we have showed statistics that prove beyond a shadow of doubt that the Republicans have no hope of victory in November. Let them sputter all they want. We win! They lose!

Pretty disgusting stuff

Here's where the labeling of Obama as a "long legged mac daddy" came from...
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY6IZsZt1xw]Dr Manning Calls Obama a Long Legged Mac Daddy! - YouTube[/ame]
from Dr. Manning, an African American PASTOR...telling it how he sees it!


More Tea Party Racists...?!?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1CLPhz0DHM


Black Tea Party Members speak out...
http://www.theroot.com/views/black-tea-partiers-speak


Here are the Black Tea Party members that the media can't seem to find....
http://silentmajority09.com/2010/08/...-seem-to-find/


Black Tea Party members dispute racist claims...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38558455.../#.T2PZ6sVgr6U

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

That was a few people in Lake County. That's all, folks.

it was Democrats in Lake County

Originally Posted by buggyone

Well, DDoug opened the door himself for a long string of Republican issues.



Republican Sex Scandals

Okay, DDoug, you are judged by association and one bad apple spoils the batch. It is your statement, so it must be true.

B1 - I looked at your list and in the top five you had three alleged, one rumored and one admission. Very much 'yellow dog' journalism. Let's look at the top - Presidents and Presidential candidates where solid proof exists - John Edwards, John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy and Bill Clinton. You should check for windows before starting a 'rock throwing' contest.

I want to also note that sexual misconduct, either real or simply alleged, does not correlate to competence. Presidents Kennedy and Clinton were both good Presidents. The 'pure one', President Carter, was arguably the worst President of the 20th Century.

Originally Posted by chachacha

sometimes i'd like to.....

Chachacha, I do not see you shooting your vacuum. Just saying.

Originally Posted by BBQMan

B1 - I looked at your list and in the top five you had three alleged, one rumored and one admission. Very much 'yellow dog' journalism. Let's look at the top - Presidents and Presidential candidates where solid proof exists - John Edwards, John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy and Bill Clinton. You should check for windows before starting a 'rock throwing' contest.

I want to also note that sexual misconduct, either real or simply alleged, does not correlate to competence. Presidents Kennedy and Clinton were both good Presidents. The 'pure one', President Carter, was arguably the worst President of the 20th Century.

BBQMan, what I did was to put down a list of Republicans who have been caught in sex scandals in a reply to DDoug stating that one bad apple spoils the entire batch. You and I both know that statement is not correct. I was only putting in a list of Republican sex scandals to prove it is BOTH parties that have major flaws - and one bad apple does not spoil the entire batch.

I will give you, also, that Jimmy "the wimp" Carter was probably the worst President of the 20th century. However, all the polls show that George W. Bush was the worst President of modern times - with a 23% approval rating when he left office (in the 21st century).