Originally Posted by Figmo Bohica

Really does not matter who is sitting in the White House. If we get enough of a change in the senate and keep the house, Obama is dead in the water for any of the programs he wants to start, keep going or whatever else he has in mind.

Also it is important to see who is running in the local and state elections. We really have more control over them than we do the federal criminals. Start at the local level and work our way up. They will get the message.

I would be willing to bet right now that the GOP takes control of both houses in 2012. The Presidential race will be closer, I think. I don't think the father of ObamaCare is going to cause much excitement. He says the first thing he's going to do is issue waivers to each state by Executive Decision, and we all know how elected Presidents keep their promises.

I'm still hoping for a conservative candidate that can withstand the "Borking" of the left, and gain the nomination.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

I would be willing to bet right now that the GOP takes control of both houses in 2012. The Presidential race will be closer, I think. I don't think the father of ObamaCare is going to cause much excitement. He says the first thing he's going to do is issue waivers to each state by Executive Decision, and we all know how elected Presidents keep their promises.

I'm still hoping for a conservative candidate that can withstand the "Borking" of the left, and gain the nomination.

That could be Gingrich. His brains and ability to say it straight out without even a blink is hard to beat.

He knows how to stick it to the slop artist talking heads that are manipulating and enabling liberal social engineering all the time, and he knows how to grab the Congress full of slop artists by the horns and wrestle them into shape.

http://townhall.com/video/gingrich-c...politics-works

Originally Posted by ilovetv

That could be Gingrich. His brains and ability to say it straight out without even a blink is hard to beat.

He knows how to stick it to the slop artist talking heads that are manipulating and enabling liberal social engineering all the time, and he knows how to grab the Congress full of slop artists by the horns and wrestle them into shape.

http://townhall.com/video/gingrich-c...politics-works

I would be thrilled if Newt is the nominee. I figured the odds would be against him because of "baggage", but now I think he can deflect that pretty well after all this time has passed.

Wherever Newt is, he's the smartest man in the room.

Originally Posted by Loveithere

Didn't stop Obama.

Did not stop the younger bush either.

Originally Posted by ilovetv

That could be Gingrich. His brains and ability to say it straight out without even a blink is hard to beat.

He knows how to stick it to the slop artist talking heads that are manipulating and enabling liberal social engineering all the time, and he knows how to grab the Congress full of slop artists by the horns and wrestle them into shape.

http://townhall.com/video/gingrich-c...politics-works

He is a dispicable human being who was saved from financial ruin by Dole when he had to pay off those HUGE ethical violation costs. He thought if you build more orphanages and gave each kid a computer there would be no more problems with kids. He is a sleazebag....

Originally Posted by ladydoc

He is a dispicable human being who was saved from financial ruin by Dole when he had to pay off those HUGE ethical violation costs. He thought if you build more orphanages and gave each kid a computer there would be no more problems with kids. He is a sleazebag....

Why don't you tell us how you really feel?

Originally Posted by ladydoc

He is a dispicable human being who was saved from financial ruin by Dole when he had to pay off those HUGE ethical violation costs. He thought if you build more orphanages and gave each kid a computer there would be no more problems with kids. He is a sleazebag....

One Gingrich is worth more then a dozen despicable democrats. Sleazebag is a definition reserved for the likes of Kennedy, Clinton, Barney Frank, John Edwards, etc.

No sleazebag is for the sleazebag who dumped his wife who had cancer for a younger things while still married to the other. Sleazebag is one who councilled Clinton on morales while dumping a wife with cancer for a younger whatever. No matter how you color Newtie, he is a sleazebag. A sleazebag is a sleazebag no matter what party he belongs to and should stay out of the public trough.

Originally Posted by Figmo Bohica

No sleazebag is for the sleazebag who dumped his wife who had cancer for a younger things while still married to the other. Sleazebag is one who councilled Clinton on morales while dumping a wife with cancer for a younger whatever. No matter how you color Newtie, he is a sleazebag. A sleazebag is a sleazebag no matter what party he belongs to and should stay out of the public trough.

Gingrich has been married three times. In 1962, he married Jackie Battley, his former high school geometry teacher, when he was 19 years old and she was 26.[114][115] In the spring of 1980, Gingrich left Battley after having an affair with Marianne Ginther.[116][117] In 1984, Battley told the Washington Post that the divorce was a "complete surprise" to her. According to Battley, in September 1980, Gingrich and their children visited her while she was in the hospital, recovering from surgery, and Gingrich wanted to discuss the terms of their divorce.[118] Gingrich has disputed that account.[91] In 2011, their daughter, Jackie Gingrich Cushman, said that it was her mother who requested the divorce, that it happened prior to the hospital stay (which was for the removal of a benign tumor, not cancer), and that Gingrich's visit was for the purpose of bringing the couple's children to see their mother, not to discuss the divorce.[1

Sometimes you have to dig deeper then the Urban Legends.

It is disgusting. So which is worse:

a) Cain's "alleged", so far unproven, horn dog behaviors, or

b) Gingrich's confirmed horn dog behaviors;

c) Perry not being able to remember the 3rd federal agency he'd abolish (when he was probably thinking, "ALL of them";

d) Romney working out and compromising to design the MA plan to get almost everyone insured, with at least 85% of the legislature being Democrat and against all Republican proposals?

Originally Posted by ilovetv

It is disgusting. So which is worse:

a) Cain's "alleged", so far unproven, horn dog behaviors, or

b) Gingrich's confirmed horn dog behaviors;

c) Perry not being able to remember the 3rd federal agency he'd abolish (when he was probably thinking, "ALL of them";

d) Romney working out and compromising to design the MA plan to get almost everyone insured, with at least 85% of the legislature being Democrat and against all Republican proposals?

Boy, oh boy, does that speak volumes on how Romney may govern if elected. Scary.