If ruling Democrats hold themselves to the high moral standards they impose on the people they govern, they would follow a simple process:

They would demand that Mrs. Clinton step down!

Democrats should say, honestly, that with a new criminal investigation going on into events around her home-brew email server from the time she was secretary of state, having Clinton anywhere near the White House is just not a good idea.

Since Oct. 7, WikiLeaks has released 35,000 emails hacked from Clinton campaign boss John Podesta. Now WikiLeaks, plans to release another 15,000 emails.

The best thing would be for Democrats to ask her to step down now. It would be the most responsible thing to do, if the nation were more important to them than power. And the American news media — fairly or not firmly identified in the public mind as Mrs. Clinton's political action committee — should begin demanding it.

Clinton has clearly disqualified herself from ever coming near classified information again.

Her aides destroyed evidence by BleachBit and hammers. Her husband, Bill, met secretly on an airport tarmac with Attorney General Loretta Lynch for about a half-hour, and all they said they talked about was golf and the grandkids.

And there was no prosecution of Hillary.

That isn't merely wrong and unethical. It is poisonous.

The Clintons weren't skilled merchants. They weren't traders or manufacturers. The Clintons never produced anything tangible. They had no science, patents or devices to make them millions upon millions of dollars.

All they had to sell, really, was influence. And they used our federal government to leverage it.

chicagotribune.com

So where's the proof, to support the title of your thread?

Where are the Dem's asking Hillary to step down?

Never mind, it's clear that desperation has compelled you to lie again.

Trump was asked by many Republicans to step aside, so how has that worked out?

J-Bo is on a roll.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Guest

If ruling Democrats hold themselves to the high moral standards they impose on the people they govern, they would follow a simple process:

They would demand that Mrs. Clinton step down!

Democrats should say, honestly, that with a new criminal investigation going on into events around her home-brew email server from the time she was secretary of state, having Clinton anywhere near the White House is just not a good idea.

Since Oct. 7, WikiLeaks has released 35,000 emails hacked from Clinton campaign boss John Podesta. Now WikiLeaks, plans to release another 15,000 emails.

The best thing would be for Democrats to ask her to step down now. It would be the most responsible thing to do, if the nation were more important to them than power. And the American news media — fairly or not firmly identified in the public mind as Mrs. Clinton's political action committee — should begin demanding it.

Clinton has clearly disqualified herself from ever coming near classified information again.

Her aides destroyed evidence by BleachBit and hammers. Her husband, Bill, met secretly on an airport tarmac with Attorney General Loretta Lynch for about a half-hour, and all they said they talked about was golf and the grandkids.

And there was no prosecution of Hillary.

That isn't merely wrong and unethical. It is poisonous.

The Clintons weren't skilled merchants. They weren't traders or manufacturers. The Clintons never produced anything tangible. They had no science, patents or devices to make them millions upon millions of dollars.

All they had to sell, really, was influence. And they used our federal government to leverage it.

chicagotribune.com

I thought in the USA you were innocent until proven guilty?
Don't you have to be charged with something first?
If they think she did it charge her other wise they should shut up.
That way she can at least get a trial

Originally Posted by Guest

I thought in the USA you were innocent until proven guilty?
Don't you have to be charged with something first?
If they think she did it charge her other wise they should shut up.
That way she can at least get a trial

Since they won't try her in court, she should be tried by the public. Quit crying, it's news worthy. More news worthy than something trump said in private eleven years ago.

Originally Posted by Guest

If ruling Democrats hold themselves to the high moral standards they impose on the people they govern, they would follow a simple process:

They would demand that Mrs. Clinton step down!

Democrats should say, honestly, that with a new criminal investigation going on into events around her home-brew email server from the time she was secretary of state, having Clinton anywhere near the White House is just not a good idea.

Since Oct. 7, WikiLeaks has released 35,000 emails hacked from Clinton campaign boss John Podesta. Now WikiLeaks, plans to release another 15,000 emails.

The best thing would be for Democrats to ask her to step down now. It would be the most responsible thing to do, if the nation were more important to them than power. And the American news media — fairly or not firmly identified in the public mind as Mrs. Clinton's political action committee — should begin demanding it.

Clinton has clearly disqualified herself from ever coming near classified information again.

Her aides destroyed evidence by BleachBit and hammers. Her husband, Bill, met secretly on an airport tarmac with Attorney General Loretta Lynch for about a half-hour, and all they said they talked about was golf and the grandkids.

And there was no prosecution of Hillary.

That isn't merely wrong and unethical. It is poisonous.

The Clintons weren't skilled merchants. They weren't traders or manufacturers. The Clintons never produced anything tangible. They had no science, patents or devices to make them millions upon millions of dollars.

All they had to sell, really, was influence. And they used our federal government to leverage it.

chicagotribune.com

I recall reading that Billy promised Hilly the presidency if she stood by him with the Monica Lewinky, can't control his WEINER fiasco.

In my view, the presidency SHOULD NOT be Billys to pay off Hilly. In my view, Hillary is running for an ILLEGAL THIRD TERM of the Clinton Mob in OUR WHITE HOUSE.

HELL, last time they left THESE TWO DIRTBAGS stole furniture form the white house and were forced to return it. DO YOU WANT THIS IN OUR WHITE HOUSE?????

Originally Posted by Guest

So where's the proof, to support the title of your thread?

Where are the Dem's asking Hillary to step down?

Never mind, it's clear that desperation has compelled you to lie again.

Trump was asked by many Republicans to step aside, so how has that worked out?

There sits OBAMA. Due to his disrespect of the Judicial branch of our government. Frankly, Obama thinks of himself as KING or DICTATOR. As to disrespect, Obama has issued more pardons then any president in history-in fact more pardons then and TEN presidents in history. That is a total disrespect of the the decisions of our court system.

With only 11 days to go, the FBI must charge HILLARY so that OBAMa THE GREAT, CAN PARDON HER. That is what we see happening. Hillary herself said there is what she wants people to see and then there is what she truly thinks and does.

TRUMP-trump is brutally honest. It is shocking after Obama. It is shocking after TWO TERMS previous of the Clintons.

I'VE HAD ENOUGH OF THIS-I'M VOTING FOR TRUMP.
CLEARLY IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE.

Originally Posted by Guest

There sits OBAMA. Due to his disrespect of the Judicial branch of our government. Frankly, Obama thinks of himself as KING or DICTATOR. As to disrespect, Obama has issued more pardons then any president in history-in fact more pardons then and TEN presidents in history. That is a total disrespect of the the decisions of our court system.

With only 11 days to go, the FBI must charge HILLARY so that OBAMa THE GREAT, CAN PARDON HER. That is what we see happening. Hillary herself said there is what she wants people to see and then there is what she truly thinks and does.

TRUMP-trump is brutally honest. It is shocking after Obama. It is shocking after TWO TERMS previous of the Clintons.

I'VE HAD ENOUGH OF THIS-I'M VOTING FOR TRUMP.
CLEARLY IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE.

Presidential Pardons

Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933 to 1945) 3,687
Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953 to 1961) 1,157
John F. Kennedy (1961 to 1963) 575
Lyndon B. Johnson (1963 to 1969) 1,187
Richard Nixon (1969 to 1974) 926
Gerald Ford (1974 to 1977) 409
Jimmy Carter (1977 to 1981) 566
Ronald Reagan (1981 to 1989) 406
George H.W. Bush (1989 to 1993) 77
Bill Clinton (1993 to 2001) 456
George W. Bush (2001 to 2009) 176
Barack Obama (2009 to 2017) 64

Originally Posted by Guest

I thought in the USA you were innocent until proven guilty?
Don't you have to be charged with something first?
If they think she did it charge her other wise they should shut up.
That way she can at least get a trial

Fact. FBI said she was "guilty" of sending/receiving classified documents on her private server. For the average US Citizen or member of our armed forces this would be, and has been prosecutable. But the Democratic Attorney General, by the way who met inappropriately with Slick Willy on an airplane tarmac while the investigation was ongoing, chose not to prosecute. You are correct, she has not been charged by the politically connected DOJ. What she has been charged with in the "Court of Public Opinion" is a majority of Citizens find her to be untrustworthy, even many Democrats. If she isn't intelligent enough in this climate of constant Cyber invasions to not use a "personal server" then this alone questions her qualification for the Presidency, not withstanding her inability to identify "Classified Documents" within. Yet this is not "politically legally" a criminal offense, but since politically we tend to selectively ignore laws and the word illegal (i.e.: Illegal Alien), at least in my opinion, she is guilty of being unqualified to be the leader of our Country.

Just wondering if Clinton did not have this email problem, what his campaign would be all about.

His proposals, and I speak of the last ones because they have changed over 100 times since the campaign bega, are so damning and bad for the country he does not even address them except with platitudes. His campaign is about those emails

He is dumb as a rock and despite what he says, not a good businessman

He lies so much folks just give up and build his lying into reports. Trump supporters, when they yell liar, seem to forget that they support not just a liar, but a COMPULSIVE liar. Read what his biographer and ghost writer have to say.

He is immoral as one can be. I guarantee, win or lose, the sex charges will come in cascades in the next few months.

Just wonder, if she had not screwed up with these emails, exactly what he would stand on.

Never read Trump supporters making a case for his proposals, simply talk about Clinton emails.

Also wonder, should he win, what happens after Election Day. He has no plans, and all of those promises are impossible to fill.....NOT impossible because of the substance, but impossible unless he can change the constitution.

Just wondering

Originally Posted by Guest

There sits OBAMA. Due to his disrespect of the Judicial branch of our government. Frankly, Obama thinks of himself as KING or DICTATOR. As to disrespect, Obama has issued more pardons then any president in history-in fact more pardons then and TEN presidents in history. That is a total disrespect of the the decisions of our court system.

With only 11 days to go, the FBI must charge HILLARY so that OBAMa THE GREAT, CAN PARDON HER. That is what we see happening. Hillary herself said there is what she wants people to see and then there is what she truly thinks and does.

TRUMP-trump is brutally honest. It is shocking after Obama. It is shocking after TWO TERMS previous of the Clintons.

I'VE HAD ENOUGH OF THIS-I'M VOTING FOR TRUMP.
CLEARLY IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE.

Well SUESIEGAL , the Clintons were not the 2 previous terms. FYI, George Bush was

Originally Posted by Guest

Presidential Pardons

Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933 to 1945) 3,687
Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953 to 1961) 1,157
John F. Kennedy (1961 to 1963) 575
Lyndon B. Johnson (1963 to 1969) 1,187
Richard Nixon (1969 to 1974) 926
Gerald Ford (1974 to 1977) 409
Jimmy Carter (1977 to 1981) 566
Ronald Reagan (1981 to 1989) 406
George H.W. Bush (1989 to 1993) 77
Bill Clinton (1993 to 2001) 456
George W. Bush (2001 to 2009) 176
Barack Obama (2009 to 2017) 64

Looks like he hasn't pardoned that many.
It is just like the Republicans Keep saying he was the only President to ran the debt up more then all his predecessors combined
Well if he did that wouldn't our debt be OVER 22 Trillion dollars now?
Lets see Reagan took office the debt was 998 Billion dollars and when he left it was 2.8 Trillion didn't he almost triple it?
988 Billion total debt from all the presidents before him and he left office with a 2.8 Trillion dollar debt, HE ran it up more then ALL his Predecessors NOT Obama
OH how about GW? didn't he take office with a 5.8 Trillion dollar debt?
and left with a 11.657 Trillion dollar debt. doubling it?
He ran it up more then all his Predecessors combined still they don't say a word about them, NOW Obama has increased it a lot but HE hasn't doubled it or Tripled it like Reagan and Bush
In order for him to have increased it more then all his predecessors combined he would have to had run it up to 23.314 Trillion that is a lot more then 19 plus Trillion
Yes they like to say things about Obama that just are not true

US Debt by President: By Dollar and Percent

Does nobody read anymore.

"Donald Trump's tax proposal would dramatically cut income taxes for the wealthiest Americans and, overall, would worsen the national debt by $7.2 trillion over the next 10 years unless offset by spending cuts that he has not proposed.

Hillary Clinton's plan would increase federal taxes by about $1.4 trillion over the decade, almost entirely by raising the bill on the same people whose taxes Trump would slice the most -- the top 1% of income earners.

Those findings, laid out in new analyses of the Clinton and Trump tax proposals by the nonpartisan, Washington-based Tax Policy Center, outline one of the starkest policy differences between the two major party candidates. "

Trump tax plan would increase national debt by $7.2 trillion, while Clinton would hike taxes on top 1%, analyses show - LA Times

""A new analysis estimates Hillary Clinton’s tax and spending proposals would have a relatively modest effect on the national debt, while Donald Trump’s fiscal plans would sharply boost deficits and the debt over the next decade.

The report from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan group that advocates debt reduction, examines the fiscal proposals of both candidates as of Sept. 21.

It finds Mrs. Clinton’s proposed tax increases, primarily on businesses and the wealthiest American households, would cover most of the cost of $1.65 trillion in new proposed spending over the next decade, including $500 billion on college education and $300 billion each on infrastructure and paid family leave."

Donald Trump Would Boost Debt More Than Hillary Clinton, Report Says - Real Time Economics - WSJ

Originally Posted by Guest

Since they won't try her in court, she should be tried by the public. Quit crying, it's news worthy. More news worthy than something trump said in private eleven years ago.

Hey, MDLBN, why don't you beg your wife to take you out for some fresh air, maybe it will clear some of the smut out of your head.