Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
NOBODY is upset about an election, but are upset about what the results of such election have brought us. If you think that only liberals are upset you are not paying attention to our health care crisis, our budget crisis, our foreign policy (not military) in shambles, and the creation (purposedly) of national divide on culture. If mocking people within the halls of our White House, especially true war heros, is in any way acceptable, then we know a different America. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
What a load of manipulative c*nty crap. Oh honey I'm so disappointed in you... . |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you go back and look at government stats and charts, you will see that when taxes were cut, tax revenues from a booming economy increased. You will see that when you raised taxes, revenues did increase but the economy stagnated and did not flourish. So many non-believers insist that tax breaks and the "trickle down" effect are myths, but do not even know what they are talking about. They insist that by cutting individual tax rates, that no one is going to make more money and pay more taxes. The point is that more jobs are created by cutting taxes because there is more money to invest. I keep hearing NON-business peons insist that rich people hoard their money and do not invest it That if they do not pay more taxes, they will lock their money away and not invest it. That is just plain stupid. Rich do not get rich by hoarding their money. Check out the difference in tax rates to GDP growth in the past century and you will discover that yes, increased tax rates increased tax revenues. But, the economy did not grow. Then look at the economy when tax rates were cut and you will also see a growth in the economy which lent also to tax revenue growth. You can sit back and deny it but facts are there for you.
If you allow idiots that crave power like Schumer and Pelosi to deceive you into thinking that cutting taxes only benefit the rich, then you deserve your socialist dependency on the government. But, before you accept socialism as your great benefactor, try living in a socialist system overseas and see how the so-called middle class lives. We live better right now than ALL of them. You want the gov to be your nanny, your financial handler? Fine, the cost is half your salary in payroll deductions. The rich does not suffer, you do. In socialist systems, the rich are still the elite but the middle class becomes an upper lower class lifestyle. Yep, the lower class survives. Just like rats and roaches in the inner cities. You will always have those that do not wish to be motivated to better themselves. If you think that cutting taxes only benefits the wealthy, then you have been conned by those wishing power over you. Quit worrying about what someone else is getting when it does not effect you. Why should the wealthy be discriminated upon by penalizing them for being successful? Does the idea of "fair treatment" only pertain to lower and middle class? Or does it pertain to ALL Americans? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"If you allow idiots that crave power like Schumer and Pelosi to deceive you into thinking that cutting taxes only benefit the rich, then you deserve your socialist dependency on the government. But, before you accept socialism as your great benefactor, try living in a socialist system overseas and see how the so-called middle class lives. We live better right now than ALL of them. You want the gov to be your nanny, your financial handler? Fine, the cost is half your salary in payroll deductions. The rich does not suffer, you do. In socialist systems, the rich are still the elite but the middle class becomes an upper lower class lifestyle. Yep, the lower class survives. Just like rats and roaches in the inner cities. You will always have those that do not wish to be motivated to better themselves"
Puerto Rico anyone?? |
|
|